PDA

View Full Version : Police officer offered to rent hotel room for 14-year-old girl, search warrant reveals



Teh One Who Knocks
04-08-2019, 10:59 AM
Tribune Media Wire


https://i.imgur.com/boG2iMo.png

CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, Va. - A search warrant revealed the sexually charged online conversation a Chesterfield police officer had with what he thought was a teenage girl.

Simeon Isaiah Crispin Steers-Smith, 30, was arrested March 22 by Hanover County Sheriff’s Office investigators and members from the Southern Virginia Internet Crimes Against Children/FBI Child Exploitation Task Forces.

Steers-Smith is accused of soliciting a sexual encounter with a task force officer who was posing as a minor online. He has been charged with three felony counts of use of a communications system to facilitate certain offenses involving children.

https://i.imgur.com/emIrf6I.png

Included in the warrant is the lengthy conversation Steers-Smith allegedly had with the undercover officer on "the web-based anonymous chat site Omegle.com. The undercover persona used was a 14-year-old female that was named 'Krystal.'"

The often-times graphic and explicit conversation occurred just before noon March 18.

Steers-Smith first asks for the age, sex and location of who he is chatting with, in which the undercover officer responds "14 f Richmond," according to the affidavit.

He allegedly then responds "30 m Richmond...is that ok?"

The conversation quickly switches the topic to a sexual nature where the search warrant showed Steers-Smith asking the minor, "tell me how old you were the first time you did anything sexual..."

The chat shortly ends after the suspect says, "oh and you asked where we would do it...ideally on your bed. But if that's too risky, I'll rent a room at a hotel."

The affidavit showed investigators were able to link an IP address to Steers-Smith's North Chesterfield home that he shares with his wife.

https://i.imgur.com/sgyvgdB.png

The search warrant later stated that "Inv. Claytor" sent a Snapchat to "studlee189 provided in the Omegle chat with the suspect" asking if he remembered chatting with "Krystal."

"The suspect responded and sent a partial photograph of himself wearing a yellow t-shirt with a sunburst/white design," according to the affidavit.

On the day Steers-Smith was arrested, investigators with the search warrant seized the following items from his home: Asus and Samsung laptops, seven thumb drives, a CD, yellow shirt, Sony and Nikon cameras, an external hard drive and a Think Pad laptop.

Steers-Smith is a patrol officer who has been with the Chesterfield Police Department since May 2017.

Chesterfield County Police Chief Col. Jeffrey Katz said the department is in the process of terminating his employment.

https://i.imgur.com/l7Rfslw.png

https://i.imgur.com/rxNOsdd.png

“I am both disturbed and disgusted by the actions alleged and I want to say clearly and unequivocally that there is no place for such conduct by anyone in our agency, in our profession, or frankly in our community,” Katz said during a press conference the day the officer was arrested.

Steers-Smith graduated from Richmond Police Academy in 2015.

Per state law, the officer will have a five day due process period to respond to the charges against him.

Steers-Smith appeared in Hanover County Juvenile & Domestic Relations Court for a bond hearing Thursday.

Prosecutors said they were worried the defendant may have actual victims outside of his online interactions.

Steers-Smith's attorneys presented several letters of support for him, but the judge still denied bond.

Investigators planned to search his cell phone Friday.

Ali Amirshahi, a Richmond defense attorney who isn't connected to the case, believed his defense has a tough road ahead.

"I think the investigator covered all of his bases, and it’s a strong case for the Commonwealth," Amirshahi stated. "I'd be preparing my client for a rough outcome."

He added, "Do they have the right person? Viewing the full affidavit here, the investigator really went to great lengths - went to the subject’s house, texted with him and got to send him a picture of himself. There doesn’t seem to be any doubt to the facts that they have the right person."

Abraham Del Rio, who is representing the suspect, declined to comment after court.

Steers-Smith is being held at the Pamunkey Regional Jail where be held without bond until his next court appearance May 10.

If convicted, he faces between five and 30 years in prison.

RBP
04-08-2019, 11:37 AM
Two cops chatting. Oh the irony.

Even if I think this is a legit bust, which I do not, what was the actual crime? Chatting? There nothing that says he made plans or tried to get the fat male cop eating a donut to meet him.

Hal-9000
04-08-2019, 06:41 PM
Two cops chatting. Oh the irony.

Even if I think this is a legit bust, which I do not, what was the actual crime? Chatting? There nothing that says he made plans or tried to get the fat male cop eating a donut to meet him.

I disagree. The other side of the chat says they are 14 and female. And he is intending to commit sexual assault on an underage girl by continuing with the arrangements to physically meet. I know we've chatted about this subject in the past. No different than if the cop on the other side said they were an assassin for hire, a drug dealer or illegal arms seller. They establish the 'service' they are willing to provide in clear language and if the suspect doesn't back out from the deal, it's now on them. Intent is part of some charges like murder, assault, rape. It's within the 'attempted' portion of the charge description.


And the name Simeon Isaiah Crispin Steers-Smithis totally pretentious...he deserves to go down.

RBP
04-09-2019, 03:08 AM
That wasn't my question. Usually these cases involve a planned and attempted meeting. They arrest them when attempt to move it from the internet to reality. This appears to be a single conversation on Omegle followed by a snapchat exchange. No meeting nor plan to meet. As unseemly as it was, can a conversation on Omegle result in a prosecution?

The fat cop could entrap from the toilet. And yes, we have litigated this over and over. What makes these cases different is that the crime is solicitation of a child. There is not (or shouldn't be) a crime if no child was solicited. In effect, we have criminalized thought crimes.

Hal-9000
04-09-2019, 03:20 PM
That wasn't my question. Usually these cases involve a planned and attempted meeting. They arrest them when attempt to move it from the internet to reality. This appears to be a single conversation on Omegle followed by a snapchat exchange. No meeting nor plan to meet. As unseemly as it was, can a conversation on Omegle result in a prosecution?

The fat cop could entrap from the toilet. And yes, we have litigated this over and over. What makes these cases different is that the crime is solicitation of a child. There is not (or shouldn't be) a crime if no child was solicited. In effect, we have criminalized thought crimes.

I wasn't aware of or concerned with your question :lol:


My lasting thoughts on the subject -There is an area in between thought crimes/intent and actual that should be prosecuted. Whether it's a fake child or a fake assassin, I believe charges should be brought to bear when the suspect's intent is realized physically. Showing up at a meeting spot, exchanging funds, handshake..

*brought to bear?* wtf is this pre-coffee English I'm using.