PDA

View Full Version : Mysterious 'Sub-Neptunes' are probably water worlds



Teh One Who Knocks
05-14-2019, 10:53 AM
By Charles Q. Choi | Space.com


https://i.imgur.com/KQ9C6Zth.png
An artist's illustration of the K2-138 system, which contains at least five "sub-Neptune" planets orbiting closely around their parent star.

Water worlds that each possess thousands of times more water than Earth does may be more common than Earth-like rocky planets in the Milky Way galaxy, a new study finds.

Over the past 20 or so years, astronomers have confirmed the existence of thousands of exoplanets, or planets around other stars. NASA's recently deceased Kepler spacecraft discovered 2,702 confirmed exoplanets, and several thousand more "candidates" it found are awaiting confirmation.

Many exoplanets are quite unlike any planets in our solar system. For example, so-called super-Earths have diameters up to twice that of Earth, and "sub-Neptune" worlds are two to four times wider than Earth. (Neptune's diameter is about four times Earth's.)

Much remains hotly debated about sub-Neptunes, such as how they formed. Their compositions remain unknown, and understanding them could help shed light on these exoplanets' origins. Previous research suggested that sub-Neptunes were either gas dwarf planets with rocky cores surrounded by envelopes rich in hydrogen and helium, or water worlds with major amounts of liquid and frozen water in addition to rock and gas.

To investigate the makeup of sub-Neptunes, scientists ran computer simulations of planetary growth to see what scenarios might best explain the masses and diameters seen to date among exoplanets. Knowing the mass and diameter of a planet can help astronomers estimate its average density, and computer simulations of planetary growth can help reveal whether compositions of gas, rock, ice or water might best explain these densities.

The researchers found that sub-Neptunes are more likely to be water worlds than gas dwarfs. They suggested that each sub-Neptune is at least 25%, and possibly more than 50 percent liquid or frozen water by mass. (In contrast, Earth is only 0.02 percent water by mass.)

"Our study suggests that there are on the order of 1,000 water worlds in just the Kepler confirmed and candidate planets," study lead author Li Zeng, a planetary scientist at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, told Space.com. "Statistically speaking, these water worlds may be more abundant than Earth-like rocky planets. Perhaps every typical sunlike star — a star of about one solar mass — has one or more of these water worlds."

The researchers divided exoplanets around sunlike stars into four main types:


Rocky worlds up to twice Earth's diameter.
Water worlds two to four times Earth's diameter that are each made up of more than 25% liquid or frozen water.
Transitional planets four to 10 times Earth's diameter that are rich in ice and possess substantial gaseous envelopes.
Gas giants more than 10 times Earth's diameter that are made up primarily of hydrogen and helium gas.

It remains a mystery why our solar system lacks planets between Earth and Neptune in size, and why the planetary systems that Kepler has seen often have more planets closer to their stars than our solar system does. Solving these puzzles might help shed light on how planetary systems typically form.

"Perhaps our solar system is less typical," Zeng said. Instead, planetary systems "with close-in rocky super-Earths and water-rich sub-Neptunes may be more common than our own solar system in our Milky Way galaxy."

The scientists detailed their findings online April 29 in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

DemonGeminiX
05-14-2019, 11:24 AM
Awesome. :thumbsup:

PorkChopSandwiches
05-14-2019, 03:51 PM
Lets go

Teh One Who Knocks
05-14-2019, 03:54 PM
I think the one thing that disappoints me the most about what I was told in school, especially more like grade and middle school, was that by the time we were adults, we would be having manned space travel and we would most likely have colonies on the moon and Mars.

Realistically we're not any closer now than we were back then. :(

Hal-9000
05-14-2019, 05:33 PM
I think the one thing that disappoints me the most about what I was told in school, especially more like grade and middle school, was that by the time we were adults, we would be having manned space travel and we would most likely have colonies on the moon and Mars.

Realistically we're not any closer now than we were back then. :(

That's kinda been my point in these discussions. You only have to read what goes into a moon landing and then understand there are no back ups. If something you build there has a problem, even on the moon, we don't have the tech to get there within 12 hours to help out.

Also the problem of traveling great distances. We just can't produce the speed necessary to get out of our galaxy. We can go to Mars yes, but even that is a long journey and for now, a one way trip.