PDA

View Full Version : Taylor Swift Lays Out Accusations Against Kanye, Kim Kardashian, & Kanye’s Former Manager



Teh One Who Knocks
07-01-2019, 02:59 PM
By James Barrett - The Daily Wire


https://i.imgur.com/LVbnAvKl.jpg

Taylor Swift laid out a series of accusations Sunday after the former manager of Kanye West purchased the rights to all of her past albums for $300 million.

Swift, who has been in the headlines for more than her music increasingly over the last year, posted a statement on Tumblr (https://taylorswift.tumblr.com/post/185958366550/for-years-i-asked-pleaded-for-a-chance-to-own-my) Sunday slamming Big Machine founder Scott Borchetta for selling the rights to all six of her past albums to Scooter Braun, Kanye's former manager. Braun, she alleged, was involved in "incessant, manipulative bullying" of her "for years," with the help of West and Kardashian.

"Some fun facts about today’s news: I learned about Scooter Braun’s purchase of my masters as it was announced to the world," she writes in a "sad and grossed out" post on Tumblr Sunday. "All I could think about was the incessant, manipulative bullying I’ve received at his hands for years. Like when Kim Kardashian orchestrated an illegally recorded snippet of a phone call to be leaked and then Scooter got his two clients together to bully me online about it. (See photo in Tumblr post) Or when his client, Kanye West, organized a revenge porn music video which strips my body naked."

"Now Scooter has stripped me of my life’s work, that I wasn’t given an opportunity to buy," she continues. "Essentially, my musical legacy is about to lie in the hands of someone who tried to dismantle it."

Swift's "revenge porn" accusation is a reference to Kanye's "Famous" video in which West appears to be lying in bed with several nude celebrities, including what appears to be a fully naked Swift lying next to him. A few months ago, Swift liked a post by one of her fans calling the "Famous" video "straight up revenge porn": "The ['Famous'] music video was straight up revenge porn. not to mention putting abuse victims next to their abusers and celebrating sexual assaulters. it was disgusting and he doesn’t get enough crap for it."

As Fox News notes, Swift's accusation against Kardashian is a reference to her "infamous recording of Swift and West's 'snippet' of a phone call in which [Swift] appeared to give her blessing to the lyrics to his song 'Famous.'" After Swift publicly denied giving West permission to use her name in the song, Kardashian posted the "snippet" on Snapchat.

In 2018, Swift signed with Republic Records, which she praises in her post for believing "I should own anything I create."

Below is Swift's full post about Braun on Tumblr:


For years I asked, pleaded for a chance to own my work. Instead I was given an opportunity to sign back up to Big Machine Records and ‘earn’ one album back at a time, one for every new one I turned in. I walked away because I knew once I signed that contract, Scott Borchetta would sell the label, thereby selling me and my future. I had to make the excruciating choice to leave behind my past. Music I wrote on my bedroom floor and videos I dreamed up and paid for from the money I earned playing in bars, then clubs, then arenas, then stadiums.

Some fun facts about today’s news: I learned about Scooter Braun’s purchase of my masters as it was announced to the world. All I could think about was the incessant, manipulative bullying I’ve received at his hands for years.

Like when Kim Kardashian orchestrated an illegally recorded snippet of a phone call to be leaked and then Scooter got his two clients together to bully me online about it. (See photo) Or when his client, Kanye West, organized a revenge porn music video which strips my body naked. Now Scooter has stripped me of my life’s work, that I wasn’t given an opportunity to buy. Essentially, my musical legacy is about to lie in the hands of someone who tried to dismantle it.

This is my worst case scenario. This is what happens when you sign a deal at fifteen to someone for whom the term ‘loyalty’ is clearly just a contractual concept. And when that man says ‘Music has value’, he means its value is beholden to men who had no part in creating it.

When I left my masters in Scott’s hands, I made peace with the fact that eventually he would sell them. Never in my worst nightmares did I imagine the buyer would be Scooter. Any time Scott Borchetta has heard the words ‘Scooter Braun’ escape my lips, it was when I was either crying or trying not to. He knew what he was doing; they both did. Controlling a woman who didn’t want to be associated with them. In perpetuity. That means forever.

Thankfully, I am now signed to a label that believes I should own anything I create. Thankfully, I left my past in Scott’s hands and not my future. And hopefully, young artists or kids with musical dreams will read this and learn about how to better protect themselves in a negotiation. You deserve to own the art you make.

I will always be proud of my past work. But for a healthier option, Lover will be out August 23.

Sad and grossed out,

Taylor

fricnjay
07-01-2019, 03:38 PM
Your worth $320 million, Shake it Off princess. :hand:

DemonGeminiX
07-01-2019, 08:02 PM
I don't understand how artists can agree to sign away rights to their master recordings to begin with.

Teh One Who Knocks
07-02-2019, 10:55 AM
I don't understand how artists can agree to sign away rights to their master recordings to begin with.

It's probably in the fine print of the contract(s) they sign, especially when you're a brand new or emerging artist. It's unethical as hell, but I'm sure there's nothing illegal about it. Just a singer wanting a record deal more than anything and willing to sign on the dotted line without reading the contract or worrying about the consequences at the time. Taylor was probably 14 or 15 when she signed with that record label and she was a complete unknown.

Teh One Who Knocks
07-02-2019, 11:57 AM
https://i.imgur.com/bWC1nmx.png

3:23 PM PDT -- Justin Bieber just went to bat for Scooter Braun in the nicest way possible, both apologizing to Taylor Swift for any hard feelings ... but also making it clear -- Scooter ain't the bad guy. Bieber threw up an IG post hours after Taylor's tirade, saying he was sorry for his 2016 post which seemed to be making fun T-Swift, but clarifying that Scooter actually encouraged him at the time not to post it. Check out his full response, it's clear he's got Scooter's back.

BzWYdS9Hj5R

4:21 PM PDT -- Scooter Braun's wife, Yael, just went scorched earth on Taylor Swift, calling BS on her claim that she discovered the news of Scooter's purchase like the rest of us ... and also claiming that Taylor passed on owning the rights to her old tunes. On Instagram, Yael writes, "You were given the opportunity to own your masters, you passed." Yael also confirmed what TMZ reported -- that Taylor's dad knew about the purchase ahead of time. She writes, "Your dad is a shareholder and was notified, and Borchetta [the CEO of Big Machine] personally told you before this came out. So no, you didn't find out with the world." Yael also goes on to slam Taylor's tendency to "collect and drop friends like wilted flowers." There's more, you just gotta read it yourself.

BzWfMAWAIkE

4:47 PM PDT -- Taylor's rep is shooting down the idea that her father was part of the Big Machine board of directors and insisting he was simply a shareholder who opted out of a phone call with the big news. The rep told People, "Scott Swift is not on the board of directors and has never been. On June 25, there was a shareholder phone call that Scott Swift did not participate in due to a very strict NDA that bound all shareholders and prohibited any discussion at all without risk of severe penalty." The rep went on to say that Taylor's dad didn't want to withhold info from his daughter, so he didn't join the call. Taylor's camp is also refuting Yael's notion that Scott Borchetta gave Taylor a heads-up about the purchase beforehand, saying ... "Taylor found out from the news articles when she woke up before seeing any text from Scott Borchetta and he did not call her in advance."

6:45 PM PDT -- Erik Logan, a member of the Big Machine board of directors, just posted the following ... "I'm not going to sit on the sidelines and allow you to re-write history and bend the truth to justify your lack of understanding of a business deal ... I also find it very interesting you use the word bully. As I watch you attempt to re-write history and parse words, all from your massive platform, I'm reminded that's what a real bully would do ... You're the real bully."
Logan goes on ... "Your power is fading, you shine is dull and this is what bully's do, they lash out."
Scott Borchetta, CEO and founder of Big Machine, just posted this ... "We first alerted all of the shareholders on Thursday, June 20th, for an official shareholder's call scheduled for Tuesday, June 25th ... Out of courtesy, I personally texted Taylor at 9:06 PM, Saturday, June 29th, to inform her prior to the story breaking ..."
He goes on to say it's possible Taylor's dad didn't tell her in advance.

DemonGeminiX
07-02-2019, 12:37 PM
Bieber needs to go back to English 101.

It LOOKS LIKE bad decision making on Taylor's part. Or maybe in Taylor's camp. But things aren't always what they appear to be. Time will tell.

Muddy
07-02-2019, 12:43 PM
In the end, who gives a shit..? :lol:

DemonGeminiX
07-02-2019, 01:12 PM
In the end, who gives a shit..? :lol:

I really don't. I just find the apparent idiocy hilarious.

Muddy
07-02-2019, 01:26 PM
I really don't. I just find the apparent idiocy hilarious.

Rich people problems..

Teh One Who Knocks
07-02-2019, 01:37 PM
Over 200,000 comments on Bieber's post :facepalm:

Muddy
07-02-2019, 01:39 PM
Over 200,000 comments on Bieber's post :facepalm:

Dont you wish we could do one of those 'Men in Black' ray-ban things and forget about social media? It really has fucked our world up..

Hal-9000
07-04-2019, 03:46 PM
passive-aggressive much?

"So for you to take it to social media and get people to hate on scooter isn’t fair. What were you trying to accomplish by posting that blog? seems to me like it was to get sympathy u also knew that in posting that your fans would go and bully scooter. Anyway, One thing i know is both scooter and i love you."


"So banter back and fourth online i dont believe solves anything..."

Christ it's painful to read :facepalm:

Hal-9000
07-04-2019, 04:46 PM
I don't understand how artists can agree to sign away rights to their master recordings to begin with.


It's probably in the fine print of the contract(s) they sign, especially when you're a brand new or emerging artist. It's unethical as hell, but I'm sure there's nothing illegal about it. Just a singer wanting a record deal more than anything and willing to sign on the dotted line without reading the contract or worrying about the consequences at the time. Taylor was probably 14 or 15 when she signed with that record label and she was a complete unknown.

I assumed that all artists would own their masters without ever having to purchase them. I guess producers and managers really are a slimy lot when signing new artists. (duhh)

And when you realize what's behind this story over and above the surface level idiocy, Kanye is trying to buy her songs just to be dick :lol: What a total fuckstick

DemonGeminiX
07-04-2019, 05:11 PM
I assumed that all artists would own their masters without ever having to purchase them. I guess producers and managers really are a slimy lot when signing new artists. (duhh)

And when you realize what's behind this story over and above the surface level idiocy, Kanye is trying to buy her songs just to be dick :lol: What a total fuckstick

Old story but relevant...

https://www.biography.com/news/michael-jackson-paul-mccartney-beatles-music-catalog

Hal-9000
07-04-2019, 05:39 PM
Old story but relevant...

https://www.biography.com/news/michael-jackson-paul-mccartney-beatles-music-catalog

Totally interesting :thumbsup:

Article says when the Beatles rights first came up for auction both Lennon and Paul opted not to buy them.

Must of been a strange decision...We're getting buttloads of money on song royalties and other associated Beatles property...do we need to buy the rights to our own songs as well??

Worth a billion right now...

And I don't believe Paul for a minute. No wonder they only worked together once or twice. I never bought the supposition that Michael was a child and knew nothing about how the world worked. He was the center of an industry.

Godfather
07-05-2019, 05:52 AM
Beiber rants about 'we need to resolve this through communication not online' ... in a tweeter :lol:

You guys ever think these music industry beefs are intentionally overblown and fabricated because ultimately 'all press is good press'?

Hal-9000
07-05-2019, 03:21 PM
Beiber rants about 'we need to resolve this through communication not online' ... in a tweeter :lol:

You guys ever think these music industry beefs are intentionally overblown and fabricated because ultimately 'all press is good press'?

I think it used to be that way until recently. Imagine you're someone like Swift or Bieber making 20 million per year before you're 25 years old. Rather than Tweet everyday you only engage once in a while to give the fans a thrill. Then you make that one Tweet that people find insulting/distasteful/politically incorrect. It's the mindset that kills them. They have everything and don't need to gain acceptance or grow their brand. It probably causes close to a god-like complex when every time you walk outside the world mobs you.

In recent years people's careers have ended with one comment interactions. People like Roseanne Barr and Kevin Spacey were blacklisted instantly. I believe the same thing is happening to musicians.

Godfather
07-06-2019, 02:52 AM
I'd be a sellout pussy if I ever got famous. I'd have some ultra-PC media pro handle all my shit and never look at it again. Easier said than done though I guess. Fans still want a real person to some extent.