PDA

View Full Version : Ruth Bader Ginsburg says Constitution makes abolishing Electoral College 'largely a dream'



Teh One Who Knocks
09-11-2019, 11:03 AM
By Brie Stimson | Fox News


https://i.imgur.com/5X83msml.jpg

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said this week that efforts to scrap the Electoral College are “more theoretical than real," according to a report.

“It’s largely a dream because our Constitution is … hard to amend,” Ginsburg said while speaking at the University of Chicago on Monday, The Chicago Sun-Times reported. “I know that from experience.”

The 86-year-old justice has previously expressed support for moving to a popular vote.

"There are some things I would like to change. One is the Electoral College,” Ginsburg said in 2017, according to The Hill. “But that would require a constitutional amendment, and amending our Constitution is powerfully hard to do.”

The Electoral College has come under increased scrutiny by Democrats since President Trump defeated Hillary Clinton in the Electoral College vote in 2016 after losing in the popular vote. Former President George W. Bush also defeated former Vice President Al Gore in 2000 via the Electoral College after losing the popular vote.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., has called the system a "scam," and a majority of Democratic presidential candidates are open to eliminating it, The Washington Times reported.

On the Republican side, Rep. Dan Crenshaw, R-Texas, tweeted last month that the Electoral College helps maintain a representative democracy.

"We live in a republic, which means 51% of the population doesn’t get to boss around the other 49%," he wrote.
1165403952411750401
Conservative columnist George Will and former U.S. Rep. Raul Labrador, R-Idaho, have said the Electoral College encourages candidates to campaign nationally and helps give representation to smaller states.

Muddy
09-11-2019, 12:04 PM
Thank god.

Teh One Who Knocks
09-11-2019, 12:07 PM
The stupid governor here signed into law that Colorado's electoral votes would go to the popular vote winner in a presidential election. People here were pissed enough to get a petition going to try and get it on the ballot to repeal the law and they got more than enough signatures, so it will be on the 2020 ballot. Hopefully we'll get it repealed, even though, like the OP says, there's no real chance of it happening, it's still the principal of the thing.

Muddy
09-11-2019, 12:11 PM
The lefts gone mad..

fricnjay
09-11-2019, 03:31 PM
I would vote for Dan Crenshaw for President. :tup:

Muddy
09-11-2019, 03:40 PM
I would vote for Dan Crenshaw for President. :tup:

I read somewhere recently where he sold out or something..

DemonGeminiX
09-11-2019, 03:41 PM
I would vote for Dan Crenshaw for President. :tup:

As long as he's in favor of Red Flag laws, I wouldn't.

PorkChopSandwiches
09-11-2019, 03:47 PM
Ruth didnt say shit, she died long ago

DemonGeminiX
09-11-2019, 03:49 PM
Ruth didnt say shit, she died long ago

So we've got a Weekend at Bernie's situation here...

Teh One Who Knocks
09-11-2019, 03:57 PM
I would vote for Dan Crenshaw for President. :tup:

If he decided to run in 2024, that would be perfect because that would give him 8 years in the government and plenty of experience in Washington, although people would knock him for not having 'executive' type experience.

fricnjay
09-11-2019, 03:58 PM
As long as he's in favor of Red Flag laws, I wouldn't.

I haven't heard him supporting that?

DemonGeminiX
09-11-2019, 04:02 PM
I haven't heard him supporting that?

I have. Pay attention. Do your due diligence, my friend.

https://www.dailydot.com/layer8/dan-crenshaw-supports-red-flag-gun-control/

There are tons of articles regarding his stance. Google "Crenshaw red flag laws"

PorkChopSandwiches
09-11-2019, 04:23 PM
So we've got a Weekend at Bernie's situation here...

When is the last time anyone actually saw her?

Teh One Who Knocks
09-11-2019, 05:22 PM
When is the last time anyone actually saw her?

https://i.imgur.com/3Pyyo5P.jpg

Pony
09-11-2019, 09:30 PM
I haven't heard him supporting that?He does "maybe" but only strictly regulated. he explains his stance here.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1HXf4W43PLU

Muddy
09-11-2019, 11:49 PM
https://i.imgur.com/3Pyyo5P.jpg

No dis-respect to her.. but Jesus.. she needs to wrap it up..