PDA

View Full Version : California Legislature Passes Bill Reducing Penalties for Oral, Anal Sex with Willing Children



Teh One Who Knocks
09-04-2020, 03:37 PM
DR. SUSAN BERRY - Breitbart


https://i.imgur.com/Kyebbh7.jpg

California lawmakers passed a bill Monday that would reduce penalties for adults who have oral or anal sex with a willing minor child if the sex offender is within ten years of the age of the victim.

The bill now heads to the desk of Gov. Gavin Newsom (D).
1300896463157821440
According to SB 145, the legislation “would exempt from mandatory registration” as a sex offender “a person convicted of certain offenses involving minors if the person is not more than 10 years older than the minor and if that offense is the only one requiring the person to register.”

The measure would allow a judge to decide if an adult who engages in oral or anal sex with a child must register as a sex offender if that person is within ten years of the age of the victim.
1301261647919550464
In January 2019, the San Francisco Examiner reported on the introduction of the bill by State Sen. Scott Wiener (D), who claimed the current law, which states oral and anal sex between an adult within ten years of the age of a willing minor requires the adult to be registered as a sex offender, discriminates against LGBT individuals.

The bill would put an end to “blatant discrimination against young LGBT people engaged in consensual activity,” Wiener said:


This bill is about treating everyone equally under the law. Discrimination against LGBT people is simply not the California way. These laws were put in place during a more conservative and anti-LGBT time in California’s history. They have ruined people’s lives and made it harder for them to get jobs, secure housing, and live productive lives. It is time we update these laws and treat everyone equally.

Currently in California, judges may decide whether adults who have “penile-vaginal intercourse” with minors close to their age must register as a sex offender.

Wiener said the current law targets LGBT individuals because they do not engage in penile-vaginal intercourse.

“This is such horrific homophobia,” Wiener said, according to the San Francisco Chronicle. “It’s irrational, and it ruins people’s lives.”

The Chronicle‘s report stated that, in 1975, California decriminalized oral and anal sex between consenting adults, but adults who engaged in these practices with minors were treated as sex offenders.

In a tweet, Wiener urged his followers to read an Associated Press “fact check” story about the controversial bill that minimizes its impact with the headline, “Bill Would Not Legalize Pedophilia in California.”

“The bill is the subject of a massive misinformation campaign by MAGA/QAnon,” Wiener posted.

DemonGeminiX
09-04-2020, 04:24 PM
ARE YOU KIDDING ME?!?

Griffin
09-04-2020, 04:28 PM
"Wiener legislation" :-s We're living in a bad sitcom.

FBD
09-04-2020, 04:55 PM
this is what happens when pedos get into office

FUCKIN ROPE

Griffin
09-04-2020, 05:34 PM
So with their rationale it is okay for a 21 year old adult to have sex with an 11 year old child?

lost in melb.
09-05-2020, 05:10 AM
So with their rationale it is okay for a 21 year old adult to have sex with an 11 year old child?

Yes, but only anally or orally :nono:

lost in melb.
09-05-2020, 05:14 AM
So here is what's actually happening here:


State Senator Scott Wiener, who introduced the bill, claims it is meant to treat LGBT offenders the same as heterosexual offenders, as there is already a similar exemption from mandatory registration for vaginal intercourse between partners of a similar age difference.

Hikari Kisugi
09-05-2020, 07:10 AM
So with their rationale it is okay for a 21 year old adult to have sex with an 11 year old child?

I believe, they want the same sentence for sodomising a boy, as for fucking a wee girl, rather than no sentence.
Its a world gone mad, I'd be seeking the alternative option, of increasing both sentences to whichever is currently the highest, and remove the 'perceived' discrimination that way.
Not by reducing either.
I feel that would be a more appropriate form of maintaining the balance and removing any perception of inequality.

higher sentences for all, not lower.

In essence he wants lower sentences for gay and trans rape of a minor than which currently exist.
WRONG UN!

Pony
09-05-2020, 12:03 PM
Yep, my understanding is they just changed the law to make it the same for same sex as it already was for straight.

In a way I kinda agree with it, they are simply leaving it up to a judge to make decisions on a case by case basis instead of a mandatory punishment. So this way if a 16YO has sex with an 18YO it's not treated the same as if a 22YO grooms and rapes a 12YO. I strongly disagree that it was written to be within a 10 year age gap though. Maybe 3 or 4 years would be more appropriate.

Hikari Kisugi
09-05-2020, 12:18 PM
I'd change it to 2 years.
ten years is crazy 11 year old being vaginally or sodomised by a 21 yr old, world of difference to, as you say, a 16 yr old giving or getting an 18yr old a blowjob, not the same case at all.

FBD
09-05-2020, 03:16 PM
but we all know that this is because globohomopedos want V for Vendetta government & security

destroying the family unit furthers that goal