PDA

View Full Version : Exclusive: Emanuel To Send Kids To U. Of C. Lab School



AntZ
07-21-2011, 02:28 PM
Exclusive: Emanuel To Send Kids To U. Of C. Lab School

July 20, 2011 10:12 PM




CHICAGO (CBS) – CBS 2 News has learned where Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s three children will attend school this fall.

The mayor repeatedly has said that he and his wife would make that decision as a family and now they have.

CBS 2 Chief Correspondent Jay Levine reports on what he learned following an exclusive interview with the mayor on Wednesday.

Sources familiar with the decision said that Emanuel’s son and two daughters will be enrolled in the private and prestigious University of Chicago Lab School in Hyde Park.

As recently as two weeks ago, Emanuel insisted that he would not publicly announce where he will be sending his kids to school

Word of Emanuel’s choice of schools came after the one-on-one interview on Wednesday, which dealt with Emanuel’s challenges as a mayor and as a parent, and how he’d separate the two.

Decisions concerning his family, he said, would be strictly divorced from politics.

“If I made a decision about my children that was not as father, but as mayor, first of all my kids would know it – because it is exactly what we said, they have a sixth sense about that – and I’d be less as a father,” he said. “I would know it and the public will understand, then I’m less of a person and I know they will appreciate that. I have absolute confidence in that.”

Only after the interview did CBS 2 learn that Leah, Ilana and Zach – who walked with their mother and father to City Hall right after the inauguration in May – would go to the top-rated South Side private school once attended by President Barack Obama’s daughters.

Emanuel and his wife chose the Lab School rather than the Chicago Public Schools he’s made such a priority both during the campaign and first months in office.

During Wednesday’s interview, the mayor talked at length about the importance of separating political from personal decisions.

“There is nothing more important to me than my children and my family and you know this as a father … our kids are unbelievably smart. They know if tjey become instruments or second priorities,” he said. “And I never want my kids to grow up thinking that my career or my profession trumps their future or their relationship with me.”

Emanuel has consulted with other politicians – including the Clintons, Daleys and Obamas – about the difficulty of raising children while holding office, drawing lines between politics and family, setting ground rules and sticking to them.

The mayor realizes the risk that people might say he doesn’t practice what he preaches by sending his own children to private school while overhauling the city’s public schools.

“They’ll have to make that judgment and I’ll have to live with the judgment I have as a father and a husband,” Emanuel said.

“Over the years, the boundary between private and public … constantly gets eroded, erased, knocked down; and unless Amy and I are vigilant about it, there’s nothing that’s gonnna – not meanly – nothing’s gonna stop you, because rules are different. And, in fact, I don’t think any of us really know anymore,” Emanuel added. “So I have to be vigilant about the wall that protects my children so they have a natural both childhood and now adolescence. And that, to me, is something I thought about and, therefore, that’s why we’re gonna be strong because, in fact, I don’t think you could tell me today where the wall is, where you stop.”

The mayor said he thinks the voters who elected him will understand that.

“Nobody elected me or voted against me based on my children. They voted for their own interest, based on their children and their families and their future,” Emanuel said. “That’s what they voted for. They didn’t vote about where I’m sending my children or any decision Amy and I make as parents or as a family. I think they respect that.”

There will undoubtedly be questions about how his choice of private school for his own children reflects on his commitment to and belief in the quality of Chicago’s public schools.

Judging from his interview on Wednesday, it’s clear this was a decision that Emanuel and his wife gave much thought and that they are comfortable with.


http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2011/07/20/exclusive-emanuel-to-send-kids-to-u-of-c-lab-school/

______________________________________


Once again these hypocrite assholes that fight ferociously to maintain the broken and corrupt public education system in the country, will always opt to send their kids to private schools, and it's always over looked by the voters and blessed by the stinking unions.

DemonGeminiX
07-21-2011, 02:31 PM
This is a non-issue. It's his kids, he can send them to which ever school he and his wife wants them to attend.

If you could afford to send your kids to a prestigious private school, wouldn't you? I would.

AntZ
07-21-2011, 02:39 PM
This is a non-issue. It's his kids, he can send them to which ever school he and his wife wants them to attend.

If you could afford to send your kids to a prestigious private school, wouldn't you? I would.


That's why the moment he and Obama took office, they ended a very successful voucher program in D.C. because the unions demanded it! Poor black kids were finally able to get a better education and the bad schools were forced to reform, but back to the old broken schools because it made the unions look bad. Have a look at the documentary "Waiting for Superman" http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1566648/ It covers the problems, and it's from a liberal point of view! Even they can't believe the corruption!

Teh One Who Knocks
07-21-2011, 02:40 PM
This is a non-issue. It's his kids, he can send them to which ever school he and his wife wants them to attend.

If you could afford to send your kids to a prestigious private school, wouldn't you? I would.

This ^^

DemonGeminiX
07-21-2011, 02:44 PM
That's why the moment he and Obama took office, they ended a very successful voucher program in D.C. because the unions demanded it! Poor black kids were finally able to get a better education and the bad schools were forced to reform, but back to the old broken schools because it made the unions look bad. Have a look at the documentary "Waiting for Superman" http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1566648/ It covers the problems, and it's from a liberal point of view! Even they can't believe the corruption!

This has nothing to do with Obama or any voucher program. This article has to do with where he wants his kids to go to school. They're his kids, and he and his wife can send them to where ever they want them to go.

AntZ
07-21-2011, 03:02 PM
This has nothing to do with Obama or any voucher program. This article has to do with where he wants his kids to go to school. They're his kids, and he and his wife can send them to where ever they want them to go.

Fine it means nothing! It's a personal matter!

Look at the way people act when conservative politicians or preachers act when they get divorced, caught cheating, get arrested drunk driving, or anything else considered compromising to what they preach! This guy and his party stand and fight for a serious institution that effects every family in the country, then does the opposite! No different if a politician spends his career trying to kill porn and close strip clubs, then gets caught frequenting them and just declares it's a private matter, leave him alone!

Acid Trip
07-21-2011, 03:20 PM
Fine it means nothing! It's a personal matter!

Look at the way people act when conservative politicians or preachers act when they get divorced, caught cheating, get arrested drunk driving, or anything else considered compromising to what they preach! This guy and his party stand and fight for a serious institution that effects every family in the country, then does the opposite! No different if a politician spends his career trying to kill porn and close strip clubs, then gets caught frequenting them and just declares it's a private matter, leave him alone!

I like your argument and example. It's the old "do as I say not as I do" problem that plagues this country. The healthcare bill covers everyone except elected officials because they will continue to use their special healthcare program. Why is national healthcare good enough for me but not them? Why are the public schools good enough for my kids but not his? It makes elected officials look complete disingenuous.

At the same time the US is a free country (mostly) and he has the right to send his kids anywhere he wants.

Teh One Who Knocks
07-21-2011, 03:34 PM
You guys should get behind an initiative to outlaw private schools then....problem solved :tup:

Acid Trip
07-21-2011, 04:07 PM
You guys should get behind an initiative to outlaw private schools then....problem solved :tup:

It has nothing to do with the schools being public or private. It's about public officials being disingenuous in their words and actions. Don't boast how good public schools are and then send your kid to a private one. Don't try to ban strip clubs while being a regular patron. I'm not sure why that's so confusing to you.

Teh One Who Knocks
07-21-2011, 04:17 PM
It has nothing to do with the schools being public or private. It's about public officials being disingenuous in their words and actions. Don't boast how good public schools are and then send your kid to a private one. Don't try to ban strip clubs while being a regular patron. I'm not sure why that's so confusing to you.

What's confusing to me is how this seems to affect you all personally. You don't seem to like it when politicians tell you what to do in your personal life, so unless you want to be a hypocrite, let them do whatever they want to do in their personal lives. Not so sure why that's confusing to you.

FBD
07-21-2011, 04:25 PM
It doesnt affect us personally - it effects the nation - the hypocrisy, that is. Obama & crew killing the voucher program sure affected a lot of kids that used to have the opportunity, that's for sure!

We all know Rahm doesnt "want to send his kids to the same school as the rest of those monsters." :roll:

Acid Trip
07-21-2011, 04:54 PM
What's confusing to me is how this seems to affect you all personally. You don't seem to like it when politicians tell you what to do in your personal life, so unless you want to be a hypocrite, let them do whatever they want to do in their personal lives. Not so sure why that's confusing to you.

So hypocrisy by elected officials, who are elected to make major decisions that affect everyone, doesn't affect me personally? Are you kidding?

Teh One Who Knocks
07-21-2011, 04:57 PM
It doesnt affect us personally - it effects the nation - the hypocrisy, that is. Obama & crew killing the voucher program sure affected a lot of kids that used to have the opportunity, that's for sure!

We all know Rahm doesnt "want to send his kids to the same school as the rest of those monsters." :roll:

One politician sending his kids to a private school affects the entire nation? Yeah, okay...


So hypocrisy by elected officials, who are elected to make major decisions that affect everyone, doesn't affect me personally? Are you kidding?

Again, please explain to me how his personal decision to send his kids to a private school affects you personally.

redred
07-21-2011, 05:02 PM
i couldn't give a shit where he's sending his kids and i would think this guy wouldn't care where i send mine either ,he's doing and is able to do what every parent wants to do and that is to send his children to what he thinks is the best place for his kids

Hal-9000
07-21-2011, 05:26 PM
so a politician is a hypocrite and decided to send his children to a private school...I'm sure it's not the first or last time each of those events will happen.

Muddy
07-21-2011, 05:36 PM
My kids go to public school, but I live in a predominately white district...

Hal-9000
07-21-2011, 05:39 PM
my kids would be home skuled...meth lab 101, internet banking theft 101 and of course their basic times tables so they could practice meth commerce later in life :thumbsup:

redred
07-21-2011, 05:39 PM
good for you :tup:

mine will be going to public school in september and i'll walk her there none of this stopping outside the school gates in my 4x4 for me

Hal-9000
07-21-2011, 05:40 PM
thanks red :oops:

Acid Trip
07-21-2011, 07:38 PM
Again, please explain to me how his personal decision to send his kids to a private school affects you personally.

If you can't understand how hypocrisy by elected officials affects EVERYONE in this country then the problem is bigger than I thought.

It's called reinforcement by indifference. You are reinforcing bad behavior (being a hypocrite) by not giving a shit (showing indifference).

Goofy
07-21-2011, 07:39 PM
I'd do the same in his position, it's a top rated school and he can afford it......... i don't see the issue tbh. Antz, are you telling me that if you were extremely wealthy you wouldn't want the best for your own kids? What this man does or says in his political career should have absolutely nothing to do with his private life unless he breaks the law imho

Teh One Who Knocks
07-21-2011, 07:41 PM
If you can't understand how hypocrisy by elected officials affects EVERYONE in this country then the problem is bigger than I thought.

It's called reinforcement by indifference. You are reinforcing bad behavior (being a hypocrite) by not giving a shit (showing indifference).

It's obvious you don't get it one bit. Whatever dude, enjoy seething in your stew of hate.

You know what makes this funnier? If he had an (R) by his name instead of a (D), you would be defending him for exercising his personal right to do what's best for his family as you have proven time and time again (your partisanship) in any article relating to politics.

I'm done discussing this with you, might as well be talking to a wall for all the good it does. If you can't see your own hypocrisy, then I truly feel bad for you.

Muddy
07-21-2011, 07:44 PM
http://thumbs.ifood.tv/files/images/food/chicken-tomato-stew-05.jpg

Pony
07-21-2011, 08:32 PM
Seriously? *shakes head*

Do I need to start a new dueling section just so you guys can argue about nonsense? This is supposed to be about discussing topics, not turning the simplest thread into war of the words.

I'm really resisting the temptation to just start locking every thread in here as soon as the BS starts, we honestly give you guys a lot of slack in here and that's just resulted in all the "aggressive debate" running many regular members away from having a civil discussion in here.

Teh One Who Knocks
07-21-2011, 09:06 PM
I'm not waiting, this thread is now closed. And I will take this a step further, if threads start devolving into mudslinging, I will delete them. I thought about it on the ride home from work and I have had it with this section becoming nothing more than a place for political mudslinging.

If it keeps up, there will be harsher steps taken. I love lively debate as much as the next person, but I have had it with the hyper-partisan bullshit. And if anyone thinks I'm joking, then call my bluff. And keep your cries of censorship to yourself because nobody is censoring anything, I'm putting an end to the petty bickering....I have absolutely had it and enough is enough.

And by the way, all the staff agrees, this was a unanimous decision.