PDA

View Full Version : AOC says Biden picking Rahm Emanuel for cabinet would be ‘divisive’



Teh One Who Knocks
11-10-2020, 11:31 AM
By Bruce Golding | New York Post


https://i.imgur.com/6LXu0npl.jpg

Progressive Democrats and activists will be warily watching Joe Biden’s cabinet choices, US Rep. Alexandria-Ocasio Cortez said Monday — while publicly weighing in against former White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel.

“Someone like Rahm Emanuel would be a pretty divisive pick,” Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., told the New York Times.

“And it would signal, I think, a hostile approach to the grass-roots and the progressive wing of the party.”

Ocasio-Cortez cited Emanuel’s record on racial justice and his opposition to teachers unions while serving as mayor of Chicago, the Times said.

“I think that’s what people are keeping an eye out for: Is this administration going to be actively hostile and try to put in appointments that are going to just squash progressives and organizing?” she said.

“I don’t envy the Biden team. It’s a very delicate balance. But I think it’s really important to strike a good one. Because it sends a very, very powerful message on the intention to govern.”

Emanuel is favored by some Biden advisers as a potential secretary of housing or transportation, the Times said.

In his own comments to the Times, Emanuel said Biden’s projected victory — which was driven largely by wins in Rust Belt states that President Trump captured in 2016 — proved that voters weren’t moved by far-left politics.

“The progressives said we need a base candidate,” Emanuel said.

“No we didn’t. We needed someone to get swing voters. If you campaign appropriately, you can make that a governing transformation.”

Prior to running the Windy City, Emanuel served as President Barack Obama’s first chief of staff after an earlier stint as President Bill Clinton’s political director.

Emanuel’s combative, foul-mouthed style earned him the nickname “Rahmbo” and he was quickly fired from that job and shifted to a post as a White House senior adviser.

lost in melb.
11-10-2020, 11:46 AM
“And it would signal, I think, a hostile approach to the wacky grass-roots and the extremist progressive wing of the party."

ftfy

Teh One Who Knocks
11-10-2020, 11:50 AM
One of the good things to come out of the election, even with the possibility of a Biden administration, is all the infighting within the democrat party between the extreme left wing and the more moderate side.

Muddy
11-10-2020, 11:52 AM
Our local chick Abigail Spanberger (D) can't stand these radicals..

lost in melb.
11-10-2020, 11:54 AM
One of the good things to come out of the election, even with the possibility of a Biden administration, is all the infighting within the democrat party between the extreme left wing and the more moderate side.


Yeah, it's been simmering behind-the-scenes quietly and now the uglyness is going to come out into the light, which is good.

I honestly don't know how one party can fit such different views in. They should form a "Greens" 3rd party. Let them yell on the sidelines to keep their base happy and sedated but keep them away from any sensible decisions

Teh One Who Knocks
11-10-2020, 11:57 AM
Yeah, it's been simmering behind-the-scenes quietly and now the uglyness is going to come out into the light, which is good.

I honestly don't know how one party can fit such different views in. They should form a "Greens" 3rd party. Let them yell on the sidelines to keep their base happy and sedated but keep them away from any sensible decisions

The problem is, at least in American politics, a 3rd party is just not viable because they wouldn't have the money or power that the democrats and the republicans wield. All you have to do is look at the "biggest" 3rd party in this country, the Libertarian Party.

Griffin
11-10-2020, 12:03 PM
If only someone would throw chum in the water so they devour each other in the feeding frenzy.

DemonGeminiX
11-10-2020, 12:29 PM
Yeah, it's been simmering behind-the-scenes quietly and now the uglyness is going to come out into the light, which is good.

I honestly don't know how one party can fit such different views in. They should form a "Greens" 3rd party. Let them yell on the sidelines to keep their base happy and sedated but keep them away from any sensible decisions


The problem is, at least in American politics, a 3rd party is just not viable because they wouldn't have the money or power that the democrats and the republicans wield. All you have to do is look at the "biggest" 3rd party in this country, the Libertarian Party.

Lance is right. I'm really big on the Libertarian political philosophy, but realistically, I just can't see it working in its pure form in this world, so that's why I stay away from voting for them.

FBD
11-10-2020, 01:10 PM
I honestly don't know how one party can fit such different views in.

This is another thing that only makes sense in the context of infiltration and subversion; neocons and neoprogressives share a common allegiance (banksters!) You'll notice that they dont believe the "extremist" things that they say is good for their underlings to believe, e.g. actual progressive values, otherwise people like Bernie would have been completely acceptable. He was acceptable to the democrat voters, but he was not acceptable to the party heads - who are in this game to thieve and acquire power, not usher in any sort of progressive utopia. Neocons have no more intention of sticking to the Bill of Rights than the neoprogs do of ushering in an unconstitutional progutopia.