PDA

View Full Version : NBC News Anchor: ‘Fairness Is Overrated’



Teh One Who Knocks
04-01-2021, 11:16 AM
By Joseph Curl - The Daily Wire


https://i.imgur.com/RRZ0uCRl.jpg

NBC Nightly News anchor Lester Holt says “fairness is overrated” and the news media no longer needs to present both sides of a given story.

Holt, who was this week awarded the Edward R. Murrow Lifetime Achievement Award in Journalism from Washington State University, waxed poetic on the news media, at one point declaring that “it’s become clearer that fairness is over-rated.”

“Before you run off and tweet that headline, let me explain a bit,” he said. “The idea that we should always give two sides equal weight and merit does not reflect the world we find ourselves in. That the sun sets in the west is a fact. Any contrary view does not deserve our time or attention.”

Holt said “you won’t have to look far to find more current and relevant examples,” noting misinformation about the 2020 presidential election and COVID-19.

And the anchor said there’s no longer any need for a journalist to give both sides of a story equal weight.

“Decisions to not give unsupported arguments equal time are not a dereliction of journalistic responsibility or some kind of agenda. In fact, it’s just the opposite,” Holt said. “Providing an open platform for misinformation, for anyone to come say whatever they want, especially when issues of public health and safety are at stake, can be quite dangerous. Our duty is to be fair to the truth. Holding those in power accountable is at the core of our function and responsibility. We need to hear our leader’s views, their policies, and reasoning. It’s really important. But we have to stand ready to push back and call out falsehoods.”

Holt has served as the anchor of NBC Nightly News since 2015, having joined the network in 2000 and working as a co-host of “Today” and other NBC news programs.

The anchor also talked about an evolution of major media companies, which have to win the trust of their audiences even as they report “uncomfortable truths.”

And he acknowledged the fact that a departure from the objectivity once represented in journalism could “reinforce negative sentiment some hold to journalists.”

“That we have had to be more direct in our language in recent times only speaks to the volume and gravity of particular statements and claims,” Holt said. “Fact-checking is not a vendetta or attack. We all have a stake in us getting it right.”

“We must help our audiences understand what our role is in a healthy democracy. Because if we’re not asking the right questions, who is?” he said. “Imagine, if you would, what the pandemic would look like without the media holding leaders to account for vaccines rollouts or countering harmful misinformation or why some communities are being left behind.”

“Regard for truth must regain a foothold in our society so that we can weather the storms of tomorrow’s calamities, tomorrow’s pandemics,” Holt added.

FBD
04-01-2021, 11:33 AM
this asswipe should be fired from a cannon


https://www.zerohedge.com/political/meet-russiagate-prober-who-couldnt-verify-anything-steele-dossier-yet-said-nothing-years

The top analyst assigned to the FBI’s Russia “collusion” case, codenamed Crossfire Hurricane, admitted under oath that neither he nor his team of half a dozen intelligence analysts could confirm any of the allegations in the dossier — including ones the FBI nonetheless included in several warrant applications as evidence to establish legal grounds to electronically monitor a former Trump adviser for almost a year.

FBI Supervisory Intelligence Analyst Brian Auten made the admission under questioning by staff investigators for the Senate Judiciary Committee during closed-door testimony in October. The committee only this year declassified the transcript, albeit with a number of redactions including the name of Auten, who was identified by congressional sources who spoke on condition of anonymity.

“So with respect to the Steele reporting,” Auten told the committee, “the actual allegations and the actions described in those reports could not be corroborated.”

After years of digging, Auten conceded that the only material in the dossier that he could verify was information that was already publicly available, such as names, entities, and positions held by persons mentioned in the document.

His testimony, kept secret for several months, is eye-opening because it’s the first time anybody from the FBI has acknowledged headquarters failed to verify any of the dossier evidence supporting the wiretaps as true and correct.

Teh One Who Knocks
04-01-2021, 12:34 PM
Hey, at least some of these "journalists" are finally coming forward and actually admitting that they are biased and corrupt and don't care about the facts. All they want to do is push the liberal/progressive agenda. Pravda is even impressed with the American "press".

PorkChopSandwiches
04-01-2021, 03:43 PM
we knew this

Teh One Who Knocks
04-01-2021, 03:44 PM
we knew this

But like I said above, now they're actually coming out and admitting it.