PDA

View Full Version : Derek Chauvin trial verdict: Ex-Minneapolis police officer found guilty on all charges in George Floyd's death



Teh One Who Knocks
04-21-2021, 10:32 AM
By Stephanie Pagones | Fox News


https://i.imgur.com/yGg9Vidl.jpg

A panel of jurors has found former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin guilty Tuesday on all three charges in connection with the May 2020 death of George Floyd, after one of the most closely watched criminal trials in recent memory.

Chauvin, 45, was charged with second-degree unintentional murder, third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter. With Americans on edge as they awaited the verdict, the jury announced that it has found him guilty across the board.

His bail was immediately revoked and he was led away with his hands cuffed behind his back. Cheers and cars honking could be heard outside the Hennepin County Courthouse as the verdict was read.

Chauvin's sentencing is scheduled for eight weeks from now, the judge said. He could be sent to prison for decades.

It took the jury about 10 hours and 20 minutes to reach a decision, which was read late in the afternoon in a city on edge regarding the possibility of more unrest like that that erupted last spring.

The courthouse was ringed with concrete barriers and razor wire, and thousands of National Guard troops and law enforcement officers were brought in ahead of the verdict. Some businesses were boarded up with plywood.

The jury was made up of seven women and five men. Six jurors were White, four were Black and two identified as multiracial. Jurors were sequestered, their whereabouts kept secret, during deliberations that began Monday afternoon.

Floyd, a 46-year-old Black man, died on May 25, 2020 after Chauvin held his knee against his neck or upper body for nine minutes and 29 seconds, as a handcuffed Floyd repeatedly said that he could not breathe.
1384605405779689476
Police were called to the area on that day for a report that Floyd had used a counterfeit $20 bill to buy cigarettes at a neighborhood convenience store, Cup Foods.

His death prompted widespread protests, which lasted months, and calls for an end to police brutality and systemic racism.

During the trial, the jury heard from high-ranking Minneapolis police officials, loved ones of Floyd, bystanders, an officer who also responded to the scene and medical experts -- some of whom presented dueling opinions.

The case boiled down to two key questions: whether Chauvin caused Floyd's death and whether his actions were reasonable. Each charge required a different element of proof as to Chauvin's state of mind.

For all three charges, prosecutors had to prove that Chauvin caused Floyd's death and that his use of force was unreasonable.

Prosecutors didn't have to prove Chauvin’s restraint was the sole cause of Floyd's death, but only that his conduct was a "substantial causal factor." Chauvin is authorized to use force as a police officer, as long as that force is reasonable.

The defense argued that the now-fired White officer acted reasonably and that the 46-year-old Floyd died of a heart condition and illegal drug use.

Each count carried a different maximum sentence: 40 years for second-degree unintentional murder, 25 years for third-degree murder, and 10 years for second-degree manslaughter.

Under Minnesota sentencing guidelines, for a person with no criminal history, each murder charge carried a presumptive sentence of 12.5 years in prison, while manslaughter has a presumptive sentence of four years.

Earlier in the day Tuesday, President Biden weighed in by saying he believes the case is "overwhelming."

He said that he had spoken to Floyd’s family on Monday and "can only imagine the pressure and anxiety they’re feeling."

"They’re a good family and they’re calling for peace and tranquility no matter what that verdict is," Biden said. "I’m praying the verdict is the right verdict. I think it’s overwhelming, in my view. I wouldn’t say that unless the jury was sequestered now."

Fox News' Ruth Ravve and Danielle Wallace contributed to this report, as well as The Associated Press.

FBD
04-21-2021, 11:20 AM
tunes would be quite different if it was politicians' assets being burned to the ground instead of the politicians' rivals' assets being burned to the ground

lost in melb.
04-21-2021, 12:15 PM
More info:



The second-degree unintentional murder charge alleged Chauvin caused Floyd's death "without intent" while committing or attempting to commit felony third-degree assault. In turn, third-degree assault is defined as the intentional infliction of substantial bodily harm.

The third-degree murder charge alleged Chauvin caused Floyd's death by "perpetrating an act eminently dangerous to others and evincing a depraved mind, without regard for human life."

The second-degree manslaughter charge alleged Chauvin caused Floyd's death by "culpable negligence whereby the person creates an unreasonable risk, and consciously takes chances of causing death or great bodily harm."

Which do you agree/not agree with?

FBD
04-21-2021, 12:25 PM
I dont agree with any of it. There's zero space for Chauvin to commit felony 3rd degree assault; a depraved mind is absolutely fucking stupid to even mention, without regard for human life can fuck right off its bullshit psychobabble, and Chauvin did not create an unreasonable risk - absolutely none of this applies, and "justice" is globohomo.



Closing statement of prosecution:
"BELIEVE YOUR EYES... GO WITH YOUR GUT, WHAT YOU FELT"

The Monk
04-22-2021, 08:54 AM
Imagine that ?

FBD
04-22-2021, 11:14 AM
https://i.imgur.com/zyjhOW1.jpg

Teh One Who Knocks
04-22-2021, 04:12 PM
LUKE GITTOS, COLUMNIST - sp!ked


https://i.imgur.com/fmmoHmp.png

Derek Chauvin has been convicted of killing George Floyd. It took the jury just 10 hours to convict Chauvin of second-degree unintentional murder, third-degree murder, and second-degree manslaughter.

The issues the jury had to consider were technical and nuanced. The prosecution case was that Mr Floyd had died of asphyxia. The defence case was that he had died of other causes. A key defence witness was forensic pathologist David Fowler, who said there were ‘so many conflicting different potential mechanisms’ that could have led to Floyd’s death. Dr Fowler suggested that Floyd’s cause of death was a sudden cardiac arrest during a struggle with officers. The defence also highlighted Floyd’s consumption of fentanyl and methamphetamine, as well as his possible exposure to carbon monoxide from car fumes. These are difficult factual issues for a jury to contend with.

The legal questions were also complex. The third-degree-murder charge against Chauvin was dropped in February and then only reinstated in March after a Minnesota Court of Appeals ruled that it was appropriate in cases involving one victim. The fact that there was a heated legal argument over what charges Chauvin should face trial for shows that the questions the jury had to consider were not simple.

In a perfect world, the jury in this case would have been able to consider these difficult, technical questions in a cool and objective environment. They would have been able to weigh up the details of the evidence with no pressure to reach any particular outcome. But the actions of the media and the governing classes with respect to this trial leave us with a horrifying question: what if Chauvin’s trial was unfair?

Consider the truly appalling behaviour of President Biden, who said yesterday that he was ‘praying for the right verdict’. He said this while the jury were deliberating. If Biden had done this as a normal citizen in the United Kingdom, he could have faced criminal charges for contempt of court. He followed up by saying that the guilty verdict could be a ‘giant step forward for racial justice in America’. The president consistently maintained that this case was about more than the evidence. That, coming from an elected official, is an attack on the rule of law.

Biden wasn’t the only elected representative who interfered in the case. Democratic congresswoman Maxine Waters told protesters to ‘become more confrontational’ if Chauvin was found not guilty. Waters’ comments were later defended by House speaker Nancy Pelosi. Judge Peter Cahill said in the course of the trial, even before Biden’s intervention, that he wished ‘elected officials would stop talking about this case, especially in a manner that is disrespectful to the rule of law and to the judicial branch in our function’. It is hard to remember the last criminal trial in which the governing class had to be chastised directly by the presiding judge.

Then consider the jury members themselves. Some details of the jury have already been widely disseminated in the media, including their ethnic make-up and some key details of their background. In the UK, it is illegal to reveal any details about jurors on cases, and it is illegal to ask about their reasoning. But with so much information out there that could identify them, the jurors were faced with the real prospect of becoming either the heroes or villains of the George Floyd story. None of this is conducive to making impartial decisions.

Following the verdict, Judge Cahill said the jurors were diligent in their consideration of the evidence. Let’s hope that’s true. But few cases have been subject to so many factors which are extraneous to the evidence as this one. This means that, tragically, Chauvin’s trial was simply not as fair as it should have been.