PDA

View Full Version : Baby from cover of Nirvana's 'Nevermind' sues band claiming image was child pornography



Teh One Who Knocks
08-25-2021, 12:17 PM
By Jesse O'Neill | New York Post


https://i.imgur.com/iHlDqEK.png

The naked baby photographed on Nirvana’s breakthrough album "Nevermind" is now accusing the band of being child pornographers, claiming they told him to "Come As You Are" without consent.

Spencer Eldon, now 30, filed a lawsuit against Kurt Cobain’s estate and the band’s surviving members, saying the grunge pioneers violated federal child pornography statutes and sexually exploited him.

Eldon also said he has suffered "lifelong damage" from having his naked body plastered on the triple-diamond selling album, and claims neither he nor his guardians consented to the naked photoshoot, according to the federal suit.

The band, photographer, and record labels "intentionally marketed Spencer’s child pornography and leveraged the shocking nature of his image to promote themselves and their music at his expense," the suit alleges.

The plaintiff, who was four months old at the time of the 1991 underwater photoshoot, also claims he was forced to engage in "commercial sex acts," and that the band went back on an alleged promise to conceal his genitals on the album cover.

"The permanent harm he has proximately suffered includes but is not limited to extreme and permanent emotional distress with physical manifestations, interference with his normal development and educational progress, lifelong loss of income earning capacity, loss of past and future wages, past and future expenses for medical and psychological treatment, loss of enjoyment of life, and other losses to be described and proven at trial of this matter," the document read.

In 2016, 25-year-old Eldon recreated the cover fully clothed to pay homage to the hit record, which blasted indie rock to the mainstream with hits like "Smells Like Teen Spirit" and "Lithium."

"I said to the photographer, ‘Let’s do it naked.’ But he thought that would be weird, so I wore my swim shorts," Elden said of the shoot at the time.

https://i.imgur.com/m4nGOEe.png

"The anniversary means something to me. It’s strange that I did this for five minutes when I was 4 months old and it became this really iconic image."

The infant’s family was only paid $200 for the 15-second plunge in the pool, which only happened because Elden’s dad was a friend of the photographer, according to a 2008 NPR report.

Even though he seemed excited about the reenactment in 2016, days earlier the LA-based artist told Australia GQ he wished the band had stayed away.

"I’m pissed off about it, to be honest … I’ve been going through it my whole life. But recently I’ve been thinking, ‘What if I wasn’t OK with my freaking penis being shown to everybody?’ I didn’t really have a choice."

Eldon’s suit seeks damages and an injunction to seek the band from profiting from the hit album.

Muddy
08-25-2021, 01:01 PM
Ridiculous..

Griffin
08-25-2021, 01:07 PM
I'm sure people come up to him everyday and say, " Hey...Didn't I see your dick on an album cover? "

Teh One Who Knocks
08-25-2021, 01:11 PM
I'm sure people come up to him everyday and say, " Hey...Didn't I see your dick on an album cover? "

:true:

Goofy
08-25-2021, 01:58 PM
:yawn:

Teh One Who Knocks
08-25-2021, 02:00 PM
You know, if this guy just kept his mouth shut, nobody would know or even care who the person is on the cover of the album. :shakehead:

DemonGeminiX
08-25-2021, 02:02 PM
You know, if this guy just kept his mouth shut, nobody would know or even care who the person is on the cover of the album. :shakehead:

But but but.... then he won't get paid.

Muddy
08-25-2021, 02:03 PM
But but but.... then he won't get paid.

The root of the problem has been isolated.

lost in melb.
08-25-2021, 02:50 PM
He just wants his cut :dunno:

Griffin
08-25-2021, 03:13 PM
who kept the tip :-k

PorkChopSandwiches
08-25-2021, 04:01 PM
what an absolute cunt

deebakes
08-25-2021, 06:51 PM
he embraced this for a long time, it probably wasn't until someone said, 'how much did you make for that anyway?' before he thought about how much free money he should have

Muddy
08-25-2021, 07:14 PM
he embraced this for a long time, it probably wasn't until someone said, 'how much did you make for that anyway?' before he thought about how much free money he should have

Yes he did... :qft:

Teh One Who Knocks
01-05-2022, 01:02 PM
By Joseph Curl - The Daily Wire


https://i.imgur.com/G2hfyY1l.jpg

A California District Court judge has tossed out a lawsuit against Nirvana filed by a man who appeared on the grunge band’s debut album as a naked baby.

Judge Fernando Olguin dismissed the case on Monday after lawyers for Spencer Elden failed to meet a deadline “to file an opposition to the Nirvana estate’s request to dismiss last month,” the Daily Mail reported.

But Elden, 30, has until January 13 to refile.

Elden became a star when he was just four months old when he was featured on the cover of Nirvana’s breakthrough album “Nevermind,” naked in a pool with a dollar bill floating in front of him.

But as a grown man, Elden accused the band of being child pornographers and filed a lawsuit against Cobain’s estate and the band’s surviving members, saying the band violated federal child pornography statutes and exploited him sexually.

In the suit, Elden says he has suffered “lifelong damage” from the photo and says the band, the photographer, and the record label “intentionally marketed Spencer’s child pornography and leveraged the shocking nature of his image to promote themselves and their music at his expense.” Elden also claims his guardians did not consent to the naked photo.

He also claims “he was forced to engage in ‘commercial sex acts,’ and that the band went back on an alleged promise to conceal his genitals on the album cover,” the New York Post reported.

“The permanent harm he has proximately suffered includes but is not limited to extreme and permanent emotional distress with physical manifestations, interference with his normal development and educational progress, lifelong loss of income earning capacity, loss of past and future wages, past and future expenses for medical and psychological treatment, loss of enjoyment of life, and other losses to be described and proven at trial of this matter,” the suit says.

The 1991 album reached triple-diamond status, meaning it sold more than 30 million copies.

“Defendants intentionally commercially marketed Spencer’s child pornography and leveraged the shocking nature of his image to promote themselves and their music at his expense,” the lawsuit reads. “Defendants used child pornography depicting Spencer as an essential element of a record promotion scheme commonly utilized in the music industry to get attention, wherein album covers posed children in a sexually provocative manner to gain notoriety, drive sales, and garner media attention, and critical reviews.”

Elden is seeking $150,000 from each of the defendants, who include surviving band members Dave Grohl and Krist Novoselic; Courtney Love, the executor of Kurt Cobain’s estate; Guy Oseary and Heather Parry, managers of Cobain’s estate; photographer Kirk Weddle; art director Robert Fisher; and a number of existing or defunct record companies that released or distributed the album in the last three decades, Variety reported.

Lawyers for the band filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit on behalf of the late Kurt Cobain’s estate and the surviving members of Nirvana, calling the suit an “absurd” money grab.

lost in melb.
01-05-2022, 01:43 PM
It's not over yet....

deebakes
01-05-2022, 02:15 PM
i love this part:


Elden became a star

no one went looking for the name of a random naked baby on the cover

Muddy
01-05-2022, 06:16 PM
Devils advocate here. Would there be an issue if the kid was a little girl with her inner vulva being shown?

PorkChopSandwiches
01-05-2022, 06:19 PM
Devils advocate here. Would there be an issue if the kid was a little girl with her inner vulva being shown?

Was his inner butthole showing

Muddy
01-05-2022, 06:20 PM
Was his inner butthole showing

Guys don't have a wallet to hide their ham.

deebakes
01-05-2022, 06:24 PM
Devils advocate here. Would there be an issue if the kid was a little girl with her inner vulva being shown?

they wouldn't have done that, that's not artistic in kids.

20 something year olds would be different :tup:

Teh One Who Knocks
01-14-2022, 12:42 PM
By NANCY DILLON - Rolling Stone


https://i.imgur.com/gReeriBl.jpg

The man pictured as the naked baby on Nirvana’s Nevermind album cover has revived his “child pornography” lawsuit against the band after it was dismissed by a federal judge in California last week.

Spencer Elden filed his second amended complaint late Wednesday, meeting a deadline set by Judge Fernando M. Olguin to reinstate the claims. The judge previously tossed the case Jan. 3 on the grounds Elden had failed to respond to a motion to dismiss filed by Nirvana and the other defendants last month.

In his new filing, Elden, now 30, drops his claim related to sex trafficking after Nirvana’s lawyers argued the alleged trafficking of Elden occurred before lawmakers made it possible for victims to sue using the federal sex-trafficking-of-children statute.

But Elden re-ups his other claims alleging Nirvana — as well Kurt Cobain’s estate, photographer Kurt Weddle, and various record labels — “intentionally commercially marketed the child pornography depicting Spencer and leveraged the lascivious nature of his image to promote the Nevermind album, the band, and Nirvana’s music, while earning, at a minimum, tens of millions of dollars in the aggregate.”

The latest complaint also includes an attached statement from Robert Fisher, an art director for the Nevermind cover who was dropped as a defendant in the lawsuit on Dec. 22. The statement, dated Dec. 21, attaches artwork purported to be Fisher’s original mock-up of the cover using a stock image. The mock-up has a different naked baby in a pose that doesn’t show any genitalia. Elden’s complaint points this out and suggests it proves the band made a deliberate decision to go in a different direction artistically.

In their Dec. 22 motion to dismiss the suit, Nirvana’s lawyers argued that Elden’s willingness to associate himself with the Nevermind cover over the years — such as selling autographed copies of the cover and at one point recreating the photograph as an adult for a paying gig — proved he didn’t suffer any damages. They also argued too much time had passed for Elden to sue.

“There is no doubt that Elden’s claims will fail on the merits,” the band’s lawyers wrote.

deebakes
01-14-2022, 10:02 PM
:(