PDA

View Full Version : AOC: When I Say ‘Tax The Rich,’ I Don’t Mean Me



Teh One Who Knocks
09-16-2021, 02:33 PM
By Amanda Prestigiacomo - The Daily Wire


https://i.imgur.com/NEAC7hwl.jpg

Far-left Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) on Tuesday informed her Instagram followers that she’s not one of the wealthy people she wants taxed, following criticism that she herself is “rich.”

“What do you say to people who argue that you’re also rich?” an Instagram user asked AOC. The Democrat earns more than $170,000 annually and owns a $35,000 Tesla.

“This is the trick people use all the time, right?” the representative responded. “They want you to think that when we talk about rich, we’re talking about a doctor or a lawyer instead of someone with hundreds of millions of dollars, if not billions of dollars. That’s what we mean by ‘rich.’”

Of course, Democratic proposals and legislation increase and levy taxes on individuals and business owners who earn far less than “hundreds of millions of dollars” or “billions of dollars.”

The question to AOC was raised in the wake of the congresswoman wearing an emblazoned “Tax the Rich” dress to the Met Gala, where tables could reportedly cost more than $275,000 and individual tickets are priced at around $30,000.

AOC on Monday scolded “haters” over the criticism and contended that going to the fancy event with rich elites was actually her just doing her job as a congresswoman in New York City.

“And before haters get wild flying off the handle, New York elected officials are routinely invited to and attend the Met due to our responsibilities in overseeing and supporting the city’s cultural institutions for the public,” she wrote via Twitter. “I was one of several in attendance in this evening.”

In the same Twitter thread, Ocasio-Cortez rationalized that the “medium is the message” and emphasized that her designer is a “Black woman immigrant designer.”

Moreover, AOC complained Tuesday that her “body” is constantly “policed” by politicos, and said that “haters” “hated” the Met Gala appearance, while the “thoughtful” were “thoughtful” in reaction.

“I thought about the criticism I’d get, but honestly I and my body have been so heavily and relentlessly policed from all corners politically since the moment I won my election that it’s kind of become expected and normalized to me,” she wrote. “The irony is that when women in power take the prospect of criticism to be cautious in their actions, they are then criticized for being ‘inauthentic’ and ‘too calculated.’ Ultimately the haters hated and the people who are thoughtful were thoughtful. But we all had a conversation about taxing the rich in front of the very people who lobby against it, and punctured the 4th wall of excess and spectacle.”

The Democratic Rep. also suggested it is her sex and race which sparks criticism.

“Honestly, our culture is deeply disdainful and unsupportive of women, especially women of color and working class women (and LGBTQ/immigrant/ etc.) from the bottom up, whether it’s lack of childcare support or especially reserving pillory for elected women and femme people.”

WATCH:
1437932463049822212

lost in melb.
09-16-2021, 02:50 PM
I'm poor :sad2:

PorkChopSandwiches
09-16-2021, 04:03 PM
Just like Bernie saying to tax all millionaires and billionaires, then he got a book deal made a few million, then it was tax all billionaires

DemonGeminiX
09-16-2021, 04:44 PM
Oh, no no, not her. Of course, not her. Taxes are for thee, but not for me.

We really need that proposed 28th constitutional amendment:

Congress shall make no law that applies to the citizens of the United States that does not apply equally to the senators and/or representatives; and, Congress shall make no law that applies to the senators and/or representatives that does not apply equally to the citizens of the United States.

Pony
09-16-2021, 09:25 PM
New York elected officials are routinely invited to and attend the Met due to our responsibilities in overseeing and supporting the city’s cultural institutions for the public,”

That means "I partied on the taxpayers dime" to anyone who doesn't speak politician.

Muddy
09-17-2021, 02:42 AM
170k isnt rich. Especially for what she does.

Godfather
09-17-2021, 03:05 AM
170k isnt rich. Especially for what she does.

I agree. I'm in favor of closing tax loops and increasing taxes on the ultra rich and corporations, the ones pulling in tens or hundreds of millions and billions. I think if that was socialized better, people wouldn't get their hackles up thinking their neighbor who started a small company and made $150k last year, or their kid who worked hard and went to law school to earn $250l is who anyone is really after. It's these fucks with billions who pay less in taxes than we do while having employees on welfare that we should be mad about, and I support politicians who aren't too scared of their donors to say it.



My conspiracy theory is that this theme of media outlets calling someone who wants to tax the rich a hypocrite for signing a book deal or earning a few hundred thousand is just a game to turn us on each other, rather than actually discussing the big whales of tax evasion. :tinfoilhat:

Muddy
09-17-2021, 03:45 AM
Booo-yaa..!!

deebakes
09-17-2021, 03:47 AM
:fbd:

lost in melb.
09-17-2021, 03:55 AM
That means "I partied on the taxpayers dime" to anyone who doesn't speak politician.

Absolutely not true in this case. She simple got a free ticket. There's no government funding for the met Gala.

lost in melb.
09-17-2021, 03:55 AM
P.s. the gala is a fundraiser for the museum. Come on guys!