PDA

View Full Version : Actress sues Amazon for revealing age on film database



Teh One Who Knocks
10-18-2011, 02:14 PM
Agence France Presse


A US actress has lodged a $1 million lawsuit against Amazon accusing the Internet giant of revealing her age on the film industry website IMDB by using personal details from her credit card.

The actress, who asked for her identity to be masked and is referred to only as "Jane Doe," has launched the suit for damages and interests with the Western District Court of Washington state, in northwestern Seattle.

She is alleging fraud, breach of contract and violation of her private life, as well as her consumer rights.

According to the suit, the actress, who is of Asian descent, changed her name to make it more American and has never wanted to reveal her age in order to maximize her chances of obtaining film roles.

Since 2003 her profile has been available on the Internet Movie Database (IMDB), which is owned by Amazon, when she joined the site as an unknown actress.

In 2008 to increase her exposure, she subscribed to IMDbPro which offers "insider information" to paying clients. To join the service, the actress had to hand over her credit card details.

"Shortly after subscribing to IMDbPro, plaintiff noticed that her legal date of birth had been added to her public acting profile in the Internet Movie Database, revealing to the public that plaintiff is many years older than she looks," the lawsuit states.

"In the entertainment industry, youth is king. If one is perceived to be 'over-the-hill,' i.e., approaching 40, it is nearly impossible for an up-and-coming actress, such as the plaintiff, to get work," it added.

The actress, who lives in Texas, believes details of her age were uncovered by doing record searches using her credit card information, and has asked the site to remove her age from her profile, but it has refused.

Contacted by AFP, Amazon spokeswoman Mary Osako, declined to comment on the case, saying: "We have a long-standing practice of not commenting on active litigation."

The lawsuit alleges that Amazon's "actions have had a double-whammy effect on plaintiff’s livelihood."

"First, because lesser-known forty-year-old actresses are not in demand in the entertainment business, plaintiff has suffered a substantial decrease in acting credits, employment opportunities and earnings.

"Second, because plaintiff looks so much younger than her actual age indicates, plaintiff has experienced rejection in the industry for each 'forty-year-old' role for which she has interviewed."

redred
10-18-2011, 02:34 PM
:roll: get over it

Teh One Who Knocks
12-25-2011, 03:33 PM
Actress Forced to Reveal Name in IMDB Lawsuit
by Matthew Belloni - The Hollywood Reporter


The actress suing Hollywood information database IMDb for listing her true age cannot move forward with the case unless she reveals her identity, a federal judge has ruled.

In a sharply-worded decision issued on Friday, U.S. District Court Judge Marsha Pechman found that while the anonymous actress who sued for $1 million fears blacklisting and other retribution in Hollywood if her true identity is known, "the injury she fears is not severe enough to justify permitting her to proceed anonymously," the ruling states.

Judge Pechman gave the woman who sued as "Jane Doe" 14 days to refile the case under her own name or it will be dismissed. The woman now must choose to either move forward under her real name or drop the litigation entirely.

The IMDb case, first filed in October against IMDb and parent Amazon, argues that actors who are perceived as "over the hill" at age 40 have trouble finding work. The case has become something of a lightning rod in Hollywood as both actor guilds, SAG and AFTRA, backed the lawsuit, arguing that the listing service opens up actors to discrimination in ageist casting circles. Another actor later came forward to blast IMDb for listing his age incorrectly in an opinion piece published by The Hollywood Reporter.

In its motion to dismiss, IMDb argued that the actress was being "selfish" and that she wouldn't suffer significant discrimination from revealing her actual name in the lawsuit. The judge essentially agreed, siding with the strong public interest in litigants proceeding publically in open court. She declined to award monetary sanctions to either side.

The woman, who apparently resides in Texas, must now decide whether the case is worth the trouble of litigating in public. We've reached out to her lawyer, John Dozier, for comment and will update with a response.

deebakes
12-25-2011, 04:35 PM
:bored: