PDA

View Full Version : Bank of America nixes $5 debit card fee



Teh One Who Knocks
11-01-2011, 09:18 PM
By CANDICE CHOI, AP Personal Finance Writer


http://i.imgur.com/5MLtc.jpg

NEW YORK – Bank of America Corp. is scrapping its plan to charge a $5 monthly fee for making debit card purchases after an uproar and threatened exodus by customers.

The about-face comes as customers petitioned the bank, and mobilized to close their accounts and take their business elsewhere. The outcry had already prompted other major banks, including JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Wells Fargo & Co., to cancel tests of similar debit card fees last week.

SunTrust Banks and Regions Financial Corp. followed suit on Monday.

Anne Pace, a spokeswoman for Bank of America, declined to say whether the company experienced a spike in account closures since announcing plans for the debit card fee in September.

But in a statement Tuesday, Bank of America's co-Chief Operating Officer David Darnell said the decision was based on customer feedback. "Our customers' voices are most important to us. As a result, we are not currently charging the fee and will not be moving forward with any additional plans to do so," he said.

Pace added that a "changing competitive marketplace" also played a role.

The retreat by the banking industry on debit fees comes amid growing public anger over higher bank fees.

"When I heard about the fee, it was the last straw for me," said Molly Katchpole, a 22-year-old nanny who started the online petition urging Bank of America to drop the debit fee. "I'm living paycheck to paycheck and one more fee was just too much."

Katchpole said it was exciting that customers were able to sway a big corporation to rethink its decision. But she already closed her account a few weeks ago and said the bank's decision won't win her back.

She plans to stay with her new community bank in Washington, D.C.

Other customers may be more forgiving.

Diane Abela, a 38-year-old Manhattan resident, said she had been waiting to see if Bank of America would back down on its plan before closing her account.

"I had a feeling if there was big outcry, they wouldn't go through with it," said Abela, who is unemployed. She said she would've canceled her account if the bank had followed through.

"I'm unemployed and $5 makes a big difference," she said. "When you're working on a budget every week, it's the last thing you need."

Unlike Chase and Wells Fargo, Bank of America's announcement that it would start charging customers a monthly debit card fee had come without any testing in the marketplace.

Instead, the decision to roll out the fee early next year was based on internal surveys with customers. Pace declined to detail the nature of those surveys but said that in the past couple of weeks, "customer sentiment changed."

The banking industry's retreat from a debit card fee doesn't mean customers aren't seeing higher fees elsewhere, however.

This past spring, for example, Bank of America raised the monthly fee on its basic checking account to $12, from $8.95.

The Charlotte, N.C.-based bank is also testing a new menu of checking accounts with monthly fees ranging from $6 to $25 in Arizona, Georgia and Massachusetts. Pace said the pilot program is seeing "good results" and that the bank plans to move ahead with its rollout sometime next year.

Other, smaller fees may be nicking away at customer accounts as well. In September, the bank instituted a $5 fee to replace debit cards, with overnight rush delivery costing $20. Both services had previously been free. The unwelcome changes for consumers aren't limited to Bank of America.

Chase this year also doubled the fee on its basic checking account to $12 a month. But the bank says it will end a test in Georgia of a basic checking account that charged a $15 monthly fee.

And like many other banks, Wells Fargo ended its debit rewards program earlier this year after doing away with its free checking accounts with no strings attached late last year.

The wave of fee hikes comes as the industry adjusts to new regulations.

In particular, banks in the past year have blamed their fee hikes on a new federal regulation championed by Senator Dick Durbin of Illinois. The law, which went into effect last month, caps the amount banks can charge merchants whenever customers swipe their debit cards.

JPMorgan has said it would lose $300 million each quarter as a result of the regulation; Wells Fargo said it would lose $250 million a quarter.

Godfather
11-01-2011, 09:23 PM
It was totally the anger and criticism on this forum that forced them to change their minds.... go team.

JoeyB
11-01-2011, 09:30 PM
Bam, see, standing up to the banks works. I was reading this news last night and almost posted it here, but I remembered the fights in the original thread and didn't want to start shit.

But, since the thread has appeared, just saying I am glad to see consumers winning out here.

Once again, we see that erroneous argument:

In particular, banks in the past year have blamed their fee hikes on a new federal regulation championed by Senator Dick Durbin of Illinois. The law, which went into effect last month, caps the amount banks can charge merchants whenever customers swipe their debit cards.

JPMorgan has said it would lose $300 million each quarter as a result of the regulation; Wells Fargo said it would lose $250 million a quarter.

You stop the banks from being greedy in one way, and they actually have the nerve to use it as an excuse to find a new way to be greedy. Shameless!

Acid Trip
11-01-2011, 09:38 PM
JPMorgan has said it would lose $300 million each quarter as a result of the regulation; Wells Fargo said it would lose $250 million a quarter.


This is true. Put yourself in the CEO's position. A new federal regulation is going to reduce your profits by $250-300 million per quarter for a total of over a billion dollars a year.

Do you...

Go to the Board & Shareholders and say "Sorry guys, looks like we'll just have to eat this fee cut and take it out of profits/stock dividends."

OR

Do you find another source of revenue to fill the hole the regulation leaves? If you want to keep your job you better find a new revenue stream.

Muddy
11-01-2011, 09:41 PM
You start selling some pussy...

Acid Trip
11-01-2011, 09:44 PM
You start selling some pussy...

Also an acceptable revenue stream.

JoeyB
11-01-2011, 10:16 PM
This is true. Put yourself in the CEO's position. A new federal regulation is going to reduce your profits by $250-300 million per quarter for a total of over a billion dollars a year.

Do you...

Go to the Board & Shareholders and say "Sorry guys, looks like we'll just have to eat this fee cut and take it out of profits/stock dividends."

OR

Do you find another source of revenue to fill the hole the regulation leaves? If you want to keep your job you better find a new revenue stream.

The bottom line is, like all corporations, they push for maximum profit regardless of the true costs. It creates a ruthless situation.

It's best though, that we not reopen this argument.


You start selling some pussy...

It ain't easy being a pimp though.

Joebob034
11-02-2011, 04:05 PM
Bam, see, standing up to the banks works. I was reading this news last night and almost posted it here, but I remembered the fights in the original thread and didn't want to start shit.

But, since the thread has appeared, just saying I am glad to see consumers winning out here.

Once again, we see that erroneous argument:

In particular, banks in the past year have blamed their fee hikes on a new federal regulation championed by Senator Dick Durbin of Illinois. The law, which went into effect last month, caps the amount banks can charge merchants whenever customers swipe their debit cards.

JPMorgan has said it would lose $300 million each quarter as a result of the regulation; Wells Fargo said it would lose $250 million a quarter.

You stop the banks from being greedy in one way, and they actually have the nerve to use it as an excuse to find a new way to be greedy. Shameless!

WRONG AGAIN! It was the Occupy Wall Street people, see they are changing the world.

Acid Trip
11-02-2011, 04:30 PM
WRONG AGAIN! It was the Occupy Wall Street people, see they are changing the world.

Duh, running a business and making a profit = greedy. All companies should be non-profits because profit = bad.

Teh One Who Knocks
11-02-2011, 05:32 PM
It's funny that some people think this is a win for 'the little guy'. Instead of an overt $5 fee showing up on customer's statements, BoA will just bury the fee somewhere else.

JoeyB
11-02-2011, 08:08 PM
It's funny that some people think this is a win for 'the little guy'. Instead of an overt $5 fee showing up on customer's statements, BoA will just bury the fee somewhere else.

As they keep trying to do...but people will keep on their asses.

Muddy
11-02-2011, 08:12 PM
My bank doesn't charge me any fee's...

DemonGeminiX
11-02-2011, 08:13 PM
It's funny that some people think this is a win for 'the little guy'. Instead of an overt $5 fee showing up on customer's statements, BoA will just bury the fee somewhere else.

:slap:

Don't give them any ideas.

:nono:

Hal-9000
11-03-2011, 12:46 AM
I can't even comment on this...

ok, I will :rolleyes:

5 bucks a month for debit is nothing, be happy if it's passed or not