Beijing pollution.

[JoeyB]

I found this opinion piece and the accompanying photos to be quite stunning and wanted to share them.

For those of you who haven't been to China's sprawling capital of 19 million, I know descriptions of the air sound hysterical and overhyped. But I'm here to tell you: It really is that bad. The sun looks like a satellite in a dying solar system.

When I lived in Beijing for nearly 18 months before the 2008 Olympics, pollution from cars and coal plants wiped whole colors from the visible spectrum. At the time, the city was introducing a raft of changes designed to increase the number of "blue-sky days," to scrub the city clean for the Olympics (limiting the hours of factories that ring the city; tightening the number of cars on the road). But Beijing's blue skies were as rare as whiskey springs. Some days awarded this accolade, I could only just spot some of Earth’s upper atmosphere from the ground.

Hard facts are elusive in China. But especially about the “fog,” as officials call it. What makes the latest attack of smog different is that the Chinese media is feeling angry about it, even running daring headlines. And China’s bloggers and microbloggers are fueling the anger. Oh: and the busiest airport in Asia, Beijing's stupendous Capital Airport, was forced to suspend flights. That was a pretty big deal.

http://i42.tinypic.com/dmae6x.jpg

http://i41.tinypic.com/ej7ehj.jpg

http://i43.tinypic.com/34xrm29.jpg

This last one was taken at Noon:

http://i39.tinypic.com/9znf9j.jpg

[Pony]

I saw some pics from before the olympics, apparently they totally shut down all industry weeks before the event.

[Deepsepia]

I saw some pics from before the olympics, apparently they totally shut down all industry weeks before the event.

Yes, there was a lot of concern for the athletes.

There was recently a diplomatic flap over this. The US Embassy has its own air quality monitoring equipment, and due to freedom of information laws, its readings became public. .. they indicate levels much worse than what the Chinese admit to.



The U.S. Embassy air quality readings are often bleaker than the official measure. From noon Sunday to noon Monday — during which hundreds of flights were canceled because of poor visibility at Beijing's airport — embassy readings went from "hazardous" to "beyond index" as pollution exceeded the scale used by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Beijing's Environmental Protection Bureau said pollution was light.

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2011/12/08/chinas-pollution-data-shrouded-in-official-fog/


Actually, before "beyond index" there was a flap because a programmer had coded "out of range" as "crazy bad



One day this month, the reading was so high compared with the standards set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency that it was listed as "beyond index." In other words, it had soared right off the chart.

"You couldn't get such a high level in the United States unless you were downwind from a forest fire," said Dane Westerdahl, an air quality expert from Cornell University.

But China's own assessment that day, Oct. 9, was that Beijing's air was merely "slightly polluted."

Not even the most fervent propagandist would call the city's air clean, but the Chinese government made great efforts to improve air quality for the 2008 Olympic Summer Games. Beijing authorities moved huge steelworks out of the capital, switched city dwellers from coal to natural gas heating, raised emissions standards for trucks, and created new subway and bus lines. The cost of the cleanup was estimated at $10 billion, not including the investment in mass transit.

Three years later, the difference between the Americans and the Chinese is at least in part about what they're measuring. And it highlights the rapid growth in the number of cars in Beijing.

Chinese monitoring stations around the capital track large particulates of up to 10 micrometers. The number of those particles has dropped as a result of reforestation programs that lessen the dust storms that blew in from deserts. The Chinese have also been successful in reducing sulfur dioxide emissions by limiting coal heating and imposing stricter emissions standards.

The U.S. monitor tracks tinier particles — less than 2.5 micrometers — that physicians say are capable of penetrating human lungs and other organs. Car and truck exhaust is a major source of fine particulate pollution, a particular problem in Beijing, where the number of registered cars has skyrocketed from to 5 million from 3.5 million in 2008.

"There was a valuable legacy from the Olympics," said Ma Jun, director of the Beijing-based Institute of Public and Environmental Affairs. "But there are big issues here. The rising population, the expansion of the city, the fast increase in the number of cars have offset the improvements."

Regardless, the Beijing Environmental Department reported 286 "blue sky" days last year, up from 274 in 2008. And the Chinese bristle at criticism of Beijing's air quality, especially from Americans.

When an American doctor at Beijing United Family Hospital recommended this month on his blog that people wear face masks, the Communist Party-affiliated Global Times newspaper ran an article rebuking him.

The newspaper quoted an anonymous doctor at Peking University People's Hospital as saying, "The suggestion to wear air masks will make trouble out of nothing, as we've had polluted air for a long time, and we shouldn't be living with an American standard."

Diplomatic cables released this year through WikiLeaks reveal that the Chinese government has asked the U.S. Embassy to stop publishing its data, which is posted hourly on Twitter at @beijingair, an account that has 9,200 followers.

In July 2009, a Foreign Ministry official complained that because the U.S. data conflicted with China's, they were causing "confusion" and undesirable "social consequences."

The embassy installed its monitor in 2008 before the Olympics to advise its personnel about air quality, but then decided it should make readings public under diplomatic rules that require that information regarding health and security risks be made available.

The measurements drew widespread attention last November, the first time a reading for fine particulate matter went above 500 micrograms per cubic meter, about seven times the U.S. standard for "acceptable" air quality.

The embassy ended up reporting that off-the-charts reading as "crazy bad." (Embassy officials say a computer programmer with a sense of humor embedded the language in the program linking the monitor to Twitter without realizing it would ever get used.)

[JoeyB]

Yes, there was a lot of concern for the athletes.

There was recently a diplomatic flap over this. The US Embassy has its own air quality monitoring equipment, and due to freedom of information laws, its readings became public. .. they indicate levels much worse than what the Chinese admit to.



Actually, before "beyond index" there was a flap because a programmer had coded "out of range" as "crazy bad

The article I clipped this from talked about the US embassy monitoring and a few other issues, but I left it all out to focus more on the first hand observations this person had, which by themselves are quite stunning.