PDA

View Full Version : Marijuana Smoking Does Not Harm Lungs, Study Finds



PorkChopSandwiches
01-12-2012, 04:32 PM
http://i.imgur.com/yo9eV.jpg


A large new government study has found that smoking marijuana on a regular basis, even over many years, does not impair lung function.

Marijuana, the country’s most widely used illicit drug, has become increasingly popular and less stigmatized in recent years, particularly among young adults. One government report released in December found that one out of 15 high school students now smokes marijuana nearly every day, a growth fueled in part by the spread of medicinal marijuana, which is legal in 16 states. With its use rising, questions about the drug’s long-term medical consequences have garnered more attention.

The new research is one of the most extensive looks to date at whether long-term marijuana use causes pulmonary damage, and specifically whether its impact on the lungs is as harmful as smoking cigarettes. The researchers followed more than 5,000 people over two decades and found that regularly smoking marijuana — the equivalent of up to a joint a day over seven years — did not impair performance on a lung function test. The test, a measure of pulmonary obstruction that looks at the amount of air a person can force out in one second after taking a deep breath, is typically worsened by smoking tobacco.

In something of a twist, the researchers found that compared to nonsmokers, marijuana users performed slightly better on the lung function test, though the improvement was minuscule. “Even with this tiny increase in airflow, I have to admit that I really doubt that there’s any real increase in lung health,” said Dr. Stefan Kertesz, an associate professor at the University of Alabama at Birmingham school of medicine and an author of the study. The finding may merely reflect marijuana smokers’ years of “training” in taking deep inhalations and holding the smoke, the researchers said.

In the near term, smoking marijuana irritates the airways and can cause coughing, and public health advocates stress that it causes impairment that reduces attention, lowers motivation and heightens the risk of accidents. Over days or weeks, chronic use can lead to problems with learning and memory. But whether smoking marijuana sets off the type of pulmonary changes that lead to lasting damage like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, a leading cause of death among Americans, was not entirely clear.

Earlier research suggested that the impact of marijuana smoke, which contains some of the same noxious chemicals as tobacco, was not as harmful to lung function as cigarette smoke. But many of the studies were carried out over relatively short periods and contained hundreds, not thousands, of subjects.

In the new study, which was published in The Journal of the American Medical Association and financed by the National Institutes of Health, roughly 5,100 men and women in four cities – Oakland, Calif.; Chicago; Minneapolis; and Birmingham – were interviewed and given lung function tests repeatedly over 20 years. They were on average about age 25 at the start, and more than half smoked marijuana, cigarettes or both.

The researchers found that for marijuana smokers, an exposure of up to seven “joint years” — with one joint-year equivalent to smoking 365 joints or filled pipes, or an average of one joint a day for seven years — did not worsen pulmonary function. Dr. Kertesz noted that with heavier marijuana use, described as 10 joint-years of exposure or more, lung function did begin to decline. And for a person who smokes both marijuana and cigarettes, “the net effect is going to be continued loss of lung function.”

Dr. Donald Tashkin, a pulmonologist at the University of California, Los Angeles, who has studied marijuana for over 30 years and was not involved in the study, said it confirmed findings from several other studies showing “that essentially there is no significant relationship between marijuana exposure and impairment in lung function.” He said one reason marijuana smoke may not be as harmful as tobacco smoke, despite containing similar noxious ingredients, may be the fact that its active ingredient, THC, has anti-inflammatory effects.

“We don’t know for sure,” he said, “but a very reasonable possibility is that THC may actually interfere with the development of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.”

Dr. Tashkin said he and his colleagues had found in their own research — unexpectedly — that even smoking up to three joints a day did not appear to cause a decrease in lung function. “I think that the bottom line is that there does not appear to be any negative impact on lung function of marijuana smoking,” he said, “and that therefore marijuana is not a risk factor for the development of C.O.P.D. Tobacco smoking is the most important risk factor for C.O.P.D.”

Hal-9000
01-12-2012, 05:01 PM
I would dispute this...lungs are designed not to admit smoke and particles.I've smoked heavy (3-5 joints per day, very powerful weed with lots of oooey-gooey goodness) for over 20 years.The bronchial cilia get worn down and toasted from constant smoke exposure.And holding it before releasing, can't do you any favors either.

When I quit smoking pot...for even a day...I immediately breath easier and have more 02 coming in.It's not a mental perception, it's a physical improvement.

Acid Trip
01-12-2012, 05:02 PM
This has been known for some time. They've also found that smoking marijuana can help expel pollutants from your lungs.

My doctor always tells me how good my lungs sound. He'd be floored if he knew I smoked a blunt everyday after work.

PorkChopSandwiches
01-12-2012, 05:04 PM
The new research is one of the most extensive looks to date at whether long-term marijuana use causes pulmonary damage, and specifically whether its impact on the lungs is as harmful as smoking cigarettes. The researchers followed more than 5,000 people over two decades and found that regularly smoking marijuana — the equivalent of up to a joint a day over seven years — did not impair performance on a lung function test. The test, a measure of pulmonary obstruction that looks at the amount of air a person can force out in one second after taking a deep breath, is typically worsened by smoking tobacco.


I would dispute this...lungs are designed not to admit smoke and particles.I've smoked heavy (3-5 joints per day, very powerful weed with lots of oooey-gooey goodness) for over 20 years.The bronchial cilia get worn down and toasted from constant smoke exposure.And holding it before releasing, can't do you any favors either.

When I quit smoking pot...for even a day...I immediately breath easier and have more 02 coming in.It's not a mental perception, it's a physical improvement.

You dont trust our government?

Muddy
01-12-2012, 05:05 PM
:lol:

Hal-9000
01-12-2012, 05:07 PM
I would always trust medical findings over my perception...unless I lived the perception.

This one is close to home brother, putting any sort of smoke into your lungs daily does you no favors :lol: Not a huge scientific leap there...

Hal-9000
01-12-2012, 05:11 PM
Maybe to put a finer point on it....if you smoke average, what I call soup-starter weed, with barely any THC in it...you probably won't notice the adverse affects.

If you smoke the hash weed, kush or skunk varieties that I'm intimate with, it's like smoking resin at times.The weed is heavy, puts off lots of smoke and tends to turn people around me into zombies :lol:
Smoke 2 in a row of that variety and then take a quick run down the street...fast.Your lungs are constricted and you wheeze and you get dizzy.From the awesome effect of the weed? Nooo, from the lack of o2 in your body.

Acid Trip
01-12-2012, 05:12 PM
I would always trust medical findings over my perception...unless I lived the perception.

This one is close to home brother, putting any sort of smoke into your lungs daily does you no favors :lol: Not a huge scientific leap there...

Read about how many cannabinoid receptors the human body has and what they help regulate. I'm telling you we were meant to smoke this plant!

This should get you started: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannabinoid_receptor

Pony
01-12-2012, 05:35 PM
I'm sure if I only smoked one ciggy a day it wouldn't impair my lung function either.

Leefro
01-12-2012, 06:27 PM
Sponsored by piss eds and dope fiends

PorkChopSandwiches
01-12-2012, 06:37 PM
http://i.imgur.com/YRZoe.jpg

Shady
01-12-2012, 07:02 PM
I read this yesterday on a New York Times Blog and found it very interesting. It seems to go somewhat contradictory to a 2006 FDA report stating that smoking marijuana is harmful to the lungs. Of course I will tend to believe a study that has been conducted over 20 years and had a large sample group from which to pull its data than a government agency that's in bed with pharmaceutical companies.

Just like with alcohol, marijuana should be consumed in moderation in my opinion. It does state in the finding that heavy users are more likely to show decreased lung function. Just like if you consume large amount of alcohol everyday you are more likely to have liver, kidney and nutritional issues. With this report though, I don't feel bad about my old habit of coming home from work, packing one bowl, and just chilling with it all night.

deebakes
01-13-2012, 02:32 AM
:bong:

FBD
01-13-2012, 03:02 PM
Maybe to put a finer point on it....if you smoke average, what I call soup-starter weed, with barely any THC in it...you probably won't notice the adverse affects.

If you smoke the hash weed, kush or skunk varieties that I'm intimate with, it's like smoking resin at times.The weed is heavy, puts off lots of smoke and tends to turn people around me into zombies :lol:
Smoke 2 in a row of that variety and then take a quick run down the street...fast.Your lungs are constricted and you wheeze and you get dizzy.From the awesome effect of the weed? Nooo, from the lack of o2 in your body.

Honestly, I'd rather be inhaling that as opposed to a poorly or improperly fertilized plant - less THC, you are getting more of your high from the plant - and the plant burning is the bad part, not the THC burning (relatively speaking.)

Acid Trip
01-13-2012, 03:04 PM
Honestly, I'd rather be inhaling that as opposed to a poorly or improperly fertilized plant - less THC, you are getting more of your high from the plant - and the plant burning is the bad part, not the THC burning (relatively speaking.)

This is correct. And Hal, if you're lungs are hurting switch to a vaporizer.

Muddy
01-13-2012, 03:40 PM
Or he could just stop using weed. :shrug:

FBD
01-13-2012, 07:49 PM
This is correct. And Hal, if you're lungs are hurting switch to a vaporizer.

...and what is teh vaporizer? not inhaling the burnt plant, almost all thc :thumbsup:

Acid Trip
01-13-2012, 07:56 PM
Or he could just stop using weed. :shrug:

:-s

Do we suggest you stop taking your meds?

Muddy
01-13-2012, 07:59 PM
:-s

Do we suggest you stop taking your meds?


Why would you? It's prescribed from a medical doctor for a legitimate condition..

Whats your excuse?

PorkChopSandwiches
01-13-2012, 08:01 PM
Pot is an illegal substance and should be substituted with a narcotic manufacturered big pharm.

Acid Trip
01-13-2012, 08:13 PM
Why would you? It's prescribed from a medical doctor for a legitimate condition..

Whats your excuse?

As is my weed. It's not legal in my state but it is where I get it from.

Muddy
01-13-2012, 08:20 PM
As is my weed. It's not legal in my state but it is where I get it from.

Did he prescribe the meth as well?

Acid Trip
01-13-2012, 08:27 PM
Did he prescribe the meth as well?

Wow. Your medicine obviously has grumpiness as a side effect. Do they have another pill you can take for that?

We get it loud and clear. You don't smoke weed and you think you're better than us because we do. Go back to your rocking chair and pop some more pills.

Muddy
01-13-2012, 08:40 PM
Wow. Your medicine obviously has grumpiness as a side effect. Do they have another pill you can take for that?

We get it loud and clear. You don't smoke weed and you think you're better than us because we do. Go back to your rocking chair and pop some more pills.

Why do you continue to hang on to the one mild prescription medication I take ? It's legally prescribed, for a legitimate condition, and it helps me keep my knee jerk reactions in check. That's it.. No feelings of euphoria or hazy colors or burning desires to inject myself with more.. Really it's like I'm not even taking anything in terms of the feeling I get from it..

You however seem to be the type of person that is afraid of reality and not able to function unless you are pumping your body full of something that distorts and manipulates it for you.. You're very disrespectful, rude, and in general you attempt to present yourself like the master of all things narcotic or hallucinogenic.. So for you I say... Go smoke some Meth, get your xbox, and go back down to your mothers basement and fap yourself to death.. You are only fooling yourself.

Acid Trip
01-13-2012, 09:10 PM
Why do you continue to hang on to the one mild prescription medication I take ? It's legally prescribed, for a legitimate condition, and it helps me keep my knee jerk reactions in check. That's it.. No feelings of euphoria or hazy colors or burning desires to inject myself with more.. Really it's like I'm not even taking anything in terms of the feeling I get from it..

You however seem to be the type of person that is afraid of reality and not able to function unless you are pumping your body full of something that distorts and manipulates it for you.. You're very disrespectful, rude, and in general you attempt to present yourself like the master of all things narcotic or hallucinogenic.. So for you I say... Go smoke some Meth, get your xbox, and go back down to your mothers basement and fap yourself to death.. You are only fooling yourself.

Yes I've done drugs and I'm not ashamed to say so. I have more education, more life experience and more money than you despite using drugs. What does that say about you?

http://www.exalley.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/shortbus.jpg

redred
01-13-2012, 09:16 PM
hey do you think we could leave the name calling out please and try to keep the thread on track

Muddy
01-13-2012, 09:21 PM
Yes I've done drugs and I'm not ashamed to say so. I have more education, more life experience and more money than you despite using drugs. What does that say about you?

http://www.exalley.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/shortbus.jpg

What it says about me is that I think you are a guy living in a delusional fantasy on the internet.. ;)

Acid Trip
01-13-2012, 09:51 PM
What it says about me is that I think you are a guy living in a delusional fantasy on the internet.. ;)

You attach your feelings to things that have nothing to do with you and I'm delusional? You got me! :roll:

FBD
01-13-2012, 10:36 PM
mg, I'm sure you consider your drug "benign and relatively harmless" - well, plenty of us consider weed to be just that also. Its not a hallucinogen, nor can it in any way shape or form be put on even ground with meth. you even insinuating such is just...well, its bullshit, and you know it, but you say it just to make that overextrapolated comparison that doesnt even work but you know all of us will go :roll: BS...

just as there are functional pill poppers, there are functional stoners. fact of life, bro. its not something we all really need to argue over.

Muddy
01-13-2012, 11:13 PM
mg, I'm sure you consider your drug "benign and relatively harmless" - well, plenty of us consider weed to be just that also. Its not a hallucinogen, nor can it in any way shape or form be put on even ground with meth. you even insinuating such is just...well, its bullshit, and you know it, but you say it just to make that overextrapolated comparison that doesnt even work but you know all of us will go :roll: BS...

just as there are functional pill poppers, there are functional stoners. fact of life, bro. its not something we all really need to argue over.


I'm not even going in to this with you.. Really you should make some extrapolations about the OP and let AcidTrip and myself work our own shit out...

JoeyB
01-13-2012, 11:24 PM
I'm not even going in to this with you.. Really you should make some extrapolations about the OP and let AcidTrip and myself work our own shit out...

Thunderdome!!!

Muddy
01-13-2012, 11:26 PM
http://i.imgur.com/3DNPp.jpg

JoeyB
01-13-2012, 11:27 PM
http://i.imgur.com/3DNPp.jpg

Seriously, if you had a midget riding around on your back, I'd totally fear you.

Muddy
01-13-2012, 11:30 PM
Maybe I can get Porky to climb up there..

JoeyB
01-13-2012, 11:33 PM
Maybe I can get Porky to climb up there..

That sounds more like gay porn than thunderdome. I could be wrong.

Uncomfortable moment: Is porky known for being umm...of minimalistic stature? And just for the record, I enjoy miniatures so I'm cool with that.

PorkChopSandwiches
01-13-2012, 11:35 PM
I'm huge....in japan

Muddy
01-13-2012, 11:37 PM
Bigger than Hasselhoff?

PorkChopSandwiches
01-13-2012, 11:41 PM
Knee high to a grasshopper

JoeyB
01-13-2012, 11:50 PM
Once again, I have successfully derailed a thread. I shall use this power malignantly, and spread discord.

Now, everyone Deewank!

Pony
01-13-2012, 11:57 PM
Maybe I can get Porky to climb up there..

:lmao:

DemonGeminiX
01-14-2012, 07:29 AM
I like pizza.

:tup: