PDA

View Full Version : CNN Contributor Defends Virginia ‘State-Sponsored Rape’ Bill As No Different Than Consensual Sex



Teh One Who Knocks
02-20-2012, 03:10 PM
By Travis Waldron - Think Progress


http://i.imgur.com/5QJck.jpg

This week, a Virginia state House committee overwhelmingly approved a bill requiring women to receive an ultrasound before they can have an abortion. Because the majority of abortions happen in the first 12 weeks of pregnancy, many women would have to undergo an invasive procedure “in which a probe is inserted into the vagina, and then moved around until an ultrasound image is produced,” as Dahlia Lithwick explained last week.

CNN contributor and Andrew Breitbart blogger Dana Loesch, however, sees no problem with a law that effectively legalizes state-sponsored rape, saying the procedure is no different than penetration that occurred during consensual intercourse that “resulted in the pregnancy,” as Little Green Footballs reported:


LOESCH: That’s the big thing that progressives are trying to say, that it’s rape and so on and so forth. [...] There were individuals saying, “Oh what about the Virginia rape? The rapes that, the forced rapes of women who are pregnant?” What? Wait a minute, they had no problem having similar to a trans-vaginal procedure when they engaged in the act that resulted in their pregnancy.

Unfortunately, such a radical view isn’t unique to conservative talking heads like Loesch. According to Lithwick, an unnamed Republican delegate made the same argument in support of the bill, saying women consented to being “vaginally penetrated when they got pregnant.”

PorkChopSandwiches
02-20-2012, 03:18 PM
:wtf:

FBD
02-20-2012, 05:25 PM
not to mention most abortions are going in that way also


....and of course, then anyone with half a brain does their own research on it and finds out that this whole notion is a bunch of contrived bullshit, as usual

The law doesn’t specify what kind of ultrasound must be used, rather it clearly states that the sonogram “shall be made pursuant to standard medical practice in the community.”

it doesnt mention reliability - because the inserted one is naturally more accurate.

thx again for playing the progressive bullshit game! :roll:

deebakes
02-21-2012, 02:57 AM
it's not rape when they pay for it :hand:

Richard Cranium
02-22-2012, 04:25 AM
Lying sack of shit progressive socialist democrats, who would of thunk it?

Here is some of Dana's side of things..


Ed Schultz Falsely States Transvaginal Ultrasounds Are Mandated In VA Law

Ed Schultz on his show played the shortest excerpt Soros bloggers could get of my radio show without proving themselves wrong (41-seconds of a three hour broadcast, two hours of which was commentary on this specific issue) and falsely stated that the Virginia bill mandates a transvaginal ultrasound:

“.. another bill would require women seeking abortions would require a highly invasive transvaginal ultrasound first.”

False.

Here is a screencap of the section of the Virginia law as it relates to ultrasounds:
http://bigjournalism.com/files/2012/02/LAW.png


Here is a link to the full Virginia law.
http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?121+ful+SB484


I ask that Ed Schultz prove to me and his audience that transvaginal ultrasounds are mandated in this law. Furthermore, I ask that Ed Schultz prove why I received an abdominal ultrasound in my first trimester (due to a health concern) and not a TVU, as he operates under the assumption that TVUs are the only alternative. Since so many progressives, the majority of them men, are curious as to what is happening below my waist: yes, after a health scare a year ago, I had a TVU. No, it’s not rape and the comparison — as stated by a rape survivor on my show today — is offensive and desensitizes against the severity of actual rape. A woman can choose whether or not to receive an ultrasound in Virginia. A woman being raped is enduring the offense against her will.

Transvaginal ultrasounds are also not anything close to what a woman endures undergoing an abortion when a vacuum (or forceps) is inserted into the vagina and a live baby dismembered and sucked out through the hose.

Sorry, was that graphic? I didn’t mean to interrupt progressive’s romanticization of infanticide.

That was the point I was making in the clip that was conveniently limited to 41 seconds. Also this. The patriarchy couldn’t have a woman making a point against the anti-woman culture they promote on the left.

I also demand that Ed Schultz explain why there was no outrage directed towards Virginia Planned Parenthood clinics mandating ultrasounds in their offices (not for the sake of the mothering hearing her child’s heartbeat, but for the abortionist to better gauge the baby’s size). The Planned Parenthood clinics in Virginia mandate ultrasounds just like the VA law but there is no progressive outrage, why?

Let’s see if Schultz has the guts to tell the truth and answer these questions. I’m guessing he’d rather suppress the truth from his audience. Lying by omission is the only way he can present himself as credible. Schlutz needs to correct his falsehood.

FBD
02-22-2012, 12:08 PM
Ed Schultz is especially despicable because he went to the other side for the money

Arkady Renko
02-22-2012, 12:58 PM
if only those people could stick to BJs and buttsex, there'd be no need for so much bitterness.