PDA

View Full Version : Bengals Cheerleader/ex-teacher accused of having sex with student



Teh One Who Knocks
03-29-2012, 07:20 PM
Mother indicted on tampering charge
Written by Jim Hannah - The Cincinnati Enquirer


http://i.imgur.com/0KGI8.jpg

COVINGTON — A Cincinnati Ben-Gals cheerleader was indicted Thursday for allegedly having a sexual relationship with a student when she was a teacher at Dixie Heights High School.

A Kenton County grand jury indicted Sarah Jones on first-degree sexual abuse. She was also indicted on a charge unlawful use of electronic means to induce a minor to engage in sexual or other prohibited acts. The charges are felonies that are each punishable by up to five years in prison.

Her mother Cheryl Jones was indicted on a charge of tampering with physical evidence in her daughter’s case. Cheryl Jones, the principal at Twenhofel Middle School in Independence, expressed surprise when informed by a reporter of her indictment. She referred all questions to her lawyer. The tampering charge is also a felony punishable by up to five years in prison.

The lawyer, Charles T. Lester Jr., confirmed he was representing Cheryl Jones, in addition to her daughter, but declined to comment. In a written statement released later, Lester said both women will be pleading not guilty.

“Sarah has maintained her innocence. The indictment of her mother is completely baseless,” the statement noted.

Kenton County School District Superintendent Terri Cox-Cruey placed Cheryl Jones on administrative leave upon learning of the indictment. She said she had not been aware that Cheryl Jones was under investigation.

Sarah Jones, who is team captain of the cheerleading squad, resigned Nov. 30 from Dixie Heights in Edgewood where she taught freshman English for about five years. Jones cited “personal reasons” in a one-sentence resignation letter. She was 26 years old.

Cox-Cruey said she also didn’t know there was an investigation of Sarah Jones until the day the teacher resigned. Cox-Cruey said she didn’t have an opportunity to question Sarah Jones or conduct an internal investigation.

She emphasized that the indictments stem from a police investigation that, for the most part, was kept secret from the school district.

The board that certifies teachers in Kentucky said its disciplinary proceedings against Sarah Jones would likely be held in abeyance pending outcome of the criminal case. A spokeswoman for the Educational Professional Standards Board in Frankfort said they did not have an open case against Cheryl Jones, but the felony indictment would likely trigger one.

The board issues and renews certification for all Kentucky administrators and teachers. If there is a complaint against a teacher, it goes through the board, which has the power to revoke or suspend certification.

When the existence of the criminal investigation of Sarah Jones became public in December, her attorney at the time, Eric Deters, went on his radio talk show and the Internet to defend his client.

“Sarah denies it completely and apparently the quote, un quote ‘victim’ denies it and is not cooperating … and his parents are upset Sarah is having to go through this which is not usually the case in these situations,” Deters said in December.

Lester, the Joneses’ current attorney is a partner in Deters’ law firm.

Deters also represented a former Dayton High School teacher who was found not guilty of first-degree sexual abuse. Nicole Howell, who was 26 at the time, was accused of having sex with a 16-year-old football player four or five times at her MainStrasse apartment.

Howell’s case was one of the first to be prosecuted under a more-stringent state law that makes it a felony for a person in authority to have even consensual sexual relations with someone under 18. In all other instances in Kentucky, the age of consent is considered to be 16.

Sarah Jones gained national attention in 2009 when she sued online gossip site TheDirty.com and its operator, Nik Richie, after unflattering pictures of her appeared with allegations that she’d had sex with Bengals players and had two sexually transmitted diseases. The photos and comments had been provided anonymously.

Her case is being watched closely by First Amendment and technology experts after U.S. District Judge William Bertelsman ruled that TheDirty.com and Richie were not shielded from liability. The decision, issued in January, was seen as a departure from numerous other rulings protecting website operators who display defamatory third-party content.

TheDirty.com has appealed to the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati, and Sarah Jones has gone on TV shows from “20/20” to “Anderson Cooper 360” talking about the embarrassment and public scrutiny she faced after the online postings.

Sarah Jones claimed the school district had to block the website because so many students were viewing the site on school computers. The high school principal at the time even reviewed security camera footage after one post on the website alleged Sarah Jones was having sex in her classroom, The Enquirer previously reported.

RBP
03-29-2012, 07:24 PM
:facepalm:

Joebob034
03-29-2012, 08:30 PM
where the fuck was this teacher when I was high school?

PorkChopSandwiches
03-29-2012, 08:32 PM
nailed it!

Loser
03-29-2012, 09:16 PM
Fuck yea! :clap:

DemonGeminiX
03-29-2012, 09:25 PM
Ok, RBP, you can slap me all you want, but this is every teenage boy's wet dream. I can't blame any kid for tapping that all day and all night given the opportunity.

RBP
03-29-2012, 09:29 PM
Yep, it's not sexual abuse if the predator is good looking. I totally agree. :agreed:

DemonGeminiX
03-29-2012, 09:32 PM
Yep, it's not sexual abuse if the predator is good looking. I totally agree. :agreed:

:-k

Might not be sexual abuse at all. After reading the article, it doesn't look like the prosecution has a leg to stand on.

RBP
03-29-2012, 09:33 PM
In fact we should encourage this. Boys will be boys after all! :tup:

DemonGeminiX
03-29-2012, 09:38 PM
With what's presented in the article, I can't see how they got an indictment to stick. Where's the smoking gun?

:-k

Teh One Who Knocks
03-29-2012, 09:38 PM
In fact we should encourage this. Boys will be boys after all! :tup:

http://i.imgur.com/62p7z.jpg

deebakes
03-29-2012, 10:08 PM
we need to mobilize for the cause for her innocence... poor woman :(

Muddy
03-29-2012, 10:30 PM
Wow... I bet this kid was a Frigin hero...

RBP
03-29-2012, 10:34 PM
you're all disturbed. :|

deebakes
03-29-2012, 10:37 PM
:potkettle:

KevinD
03-29-2012, 10:39 PM
where the fuck was this teacher when I was high school?

In my case, she was just being born, give or take a bit. I has a sad now.

Arkady Renko
03-30-2012, 08:28 AM
you're all disturbed. :|

we see a golden opportunity where you see an abyss of peril

RBP
03-30-2012, 09:41 AM
we see a golden opportunity where you see an abyss of peril

Golden opportunity to rape a teenager? :huh:

That's like saying a girl passed out at a party is a golden opportunity to get ass sex.

Arkady Renko
03-30-2012, 09:50 AM
Golden opportunity to rape a teenager? :huh:

That's like saying a girl passed out at a party is a golden opportunity to get ass sex.

now that's just silly. A golden opportunity for the guy of course. As for the woman, I can't wrap my mind around why she thought she couldn't do better than a fifteen year old, it's abysmally stupid of her. But honestly, show me a fifteen year old boy who minds having a fling with a hot cheerleader in her mid twenties and I'll show you a hypocrite.

RBP
03-30-2012, 10:44 AM
It's not silly. Saying that somehow boys can form consent at 15 but girls can't is what's silly.

Teachers can't be fucking their students. Period. It's because of the power relationship and ability to form consent.

Muddy
03-30-2012, 11:09 AM
http://i.imgur.com/jPmSz.jpg

Arkady Renko
03-30-2012, 01:29 PM
It's not silly. Saying that somehow boys can form consent at 15 but girls can't is what's silly.

Teachers can't be fucking their students. Period. It's because of the power relationship and ability to form consent.

Oh, sure, she's evidently disqualified as a teacher, a bad example for judgement and probably not the sharpest pecil in the can. I just don't get the moral outrage bit. Do you seriously believe she had to threaten that kid with giving him bad marks or something if he didn't do it with her?


http://i.imgur.com/jPmSz.jpg

you have that one saved on your desktop, don't you?

Godfather
03-30-2012, 01:32 PM
Hooooly shit :lol: I usually side with RBP, but in this case I just can't help but think of the wonders this would do for my pent-up, sexually frustrated 15 year old self to nail this barbie doll.

The fact that she's a teacher makes it wrong, won't argue with that

Muddy
03-30-2012, 01:34 PM
I just don't get the moral outrage bit. Do you seriously believe she had to threaten that kid with giving him bad marks or something if he didn't do it with her?



One day he'll let us know the driving passion behind his condemnation.

PorkChopSandwiches
03-30-2012, 01:34 PM
http://i.imgur.com/jPmSz.jpg

Muddy
03-30-2012, 01:35 PM
*Unnnnnnnnnngh*

RBP
03-30-2012, 01:43 PM
Oh, sure, she's evidently disqualified as a teacher, a bad example for judgement and probably not the sharpest pecil in the can. I just don't get the moral outrage bit. Do you seriously believe she had to threaten that kid with giving him bad marks or something if he didn't do it with her?



One day he'll let us know the driving passion behind his condemnation.

There's nothing to know. You guys glorify grooming underage kids for sexual exploitation. I think that's wrong. And in fact, so you do, but you think it's only wrong if the perp is male. The perps are the same, male or female, predators in either case.

PorkChopSandwiches
03-30-2012, 01:58 PM
:hand: how else will we get our future porn stars

RBP
03-30-2012, 02:14 PM
:hand: how else will we get our future porn stars

18 year old hot girls with daddy issues I have no problem with. :lol:

PorkChopSandwiches
03-30-2012, 02:22 PM
I meant the dudes :twisted:

RBP
03-30-2012, 02:24 PM
I meant the dudes :twisted:

:|

deebakes
03-30-2012, 08:38 PM
did i say good for him yet? :uwank: