PDA

View Full Version : Anti-drilling advocates claim that fracking will lead to syphilis



Teh One Who Knocks
09-24-2012, 10:38 AM
Studying connection between fracking and syphilis would be a waste of time
NEW YORK DAILY NEWS


In their desperation to block Gov. Cuomo from giving the okay for fracking in New York, die-hard opponents of the natural gas drilling technology are floating laugh-out-loud-funny health and environmental threats.

Most hilariously, the enviro-activists have demanded that state officials explore an alleged link between fracking and — we kid you not — syphilis.

They argue that a drilling boom would draw an influx of male workers from other states who would engage in activities of a kind that would spread sexually transmitted diseases.

They also contend that a boom would trigger a housing crunch, adding to homelessness and the health ailments that go along with it.

And that increased truck traffic would not only lead to more road fatalities, but would also — again, no kidding — discourage people from getting the outdoor exercise they need to stay fit.

This is absurd. If New York starts saying no to entire industries on the grounds they might trigger population changes, rising home prices and truck traffic, it might as well turn out the lights.

Have the people pushing these theories considered the health effects of unemployment and poverty — which are all too common in the parts of New York targeted for drilling?

Have they forgotten the public health upsides of harvesting natural gas — which burns far more cleanly than other fossil fuels?

What fracking opponents really want is not a study of imagined risks, but many more months of wheel-spinning in Albany — and additional fodder for litigation.

Hydraulic fracturing, or hydrofracking, involves pumping millions of gallons of chemical-laced water deep into the earth at high pressure to release trapped natural gas. For four years, the state Department of Environmental Conservation has analyzed the extent of true health concerns, such as the potential for air and water pollution.

As a result, the DEC has proposed what everyone acknowledges are some of the tightest regulations in the nation — including an absolute ban on drilling in the entire region surrounding New York City’s reservoirs.

The opponents tried to push DEC Commissioner Joseph Martens into hiring a public health consultant to check out the danger of venereal diseases and all the rest.

Smartly, he went only so far as to ask Health Commissioner Nirav Shah to review whether DEC has appropriately considered health concerns. If faux seriousness is what it takes to head off lawsuits, so be it. Stifling laughter is a small price to pay for progress toward fracking approval.

Hal-9000
09-24-2012, 05:08 PM
like the gold rush in the late 1800's caused gonorrhea?


okaaaay :lol:

Loser
09-24-2012, 06:37 PM
No bullshitting here, but they have potentially linked fracking and earthquakes.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/07/fracking-earthquake-conne_n_1752414.html

So hopefully, they'll let fracking in and around NYC, and crash that motherfucker into the ground :twisted:

FBD
09-24-2012, 06:59 PM
Frohlich identified the epicenters for 67 earthquakes — more than eight times as many as reported by the National Earthquake Information Center — with magnitudes of 3.0 or less. Most? were located within a few miles of one or more injection wells, suggesting injection-triggered quakes might be more common than thought.

"We found a lot of events that weren't getting reported," Frohlich told LiveScience.

A third of the quakes clustered into eight geographic regions. All of the wells nearest the epicenters within these areas reported high rates of injection exceeding 150,000 barrels (17.6 million liters) of water per month.

Still, Frohlich noted the Barnett Shale hosts more than 100 wells with similar injection rates that experienced no nearby earthquakes during the time he studied them. He suggests that fluid injection may trigger earthquakes only if fluids reach and relieve friction on a nearby fault.

why withhold data - mention the 100 that had no nearby earthquakes...but then be vague on exactly how many were near epicenters for quakes so small that people dont notice or report them.

to me that says weak statistical correlation, but we need to be alarmist and present it anyway.

PorkChopSandwiches
09-24-2012, 07:04 PM
:facepalm: