PDA

View Full Version : Obama blasts Michigan right-to-work legislation as politics



Teh One Who Knocks
12-10-2012, 10:51 PM
By Rachel Rose Hartman, Yahoo! News | The Ticket


http://i.imgur.com/X3Bf0.jpg

President Barack Obama traveled to the Daimler Detroit Diesel plant in Redford, Mich., Monday to issue a speech on the economy, pressure Republicans in Congress to raise taxes on the nation's top earners, and highlight Daimler's new $120 million investment in the plant.

But it was the president's criticism of Michigan's right-to work legislation that stole the show for the audience of Daimler union employees.

"What we shouldn't be doing is trying to take away your rights to bargain for better wages," the president told the audience, which immediately roared with cheers, applause and whistles. "These so-called right-to-work laws, they don't have to do with economics, they have everything to do with politics." They're about "giving you the right to work for less money," he added, noting that Michigan's history shows how unions have helped "build a better America."

New state right-to-work legislation, which forbids requiring all employees who benefit from a labor contract to pay union dues, is scheduled to move through the Michigan Legislature for final action this week. Republican Gov. Rick Snyder has pledged to sign the final version.

Activists have mobilized against the legislation, which they view to be an anti-union effort, resulting in a state Capitol lockdown last Thursday.

The president's comments Monday were his first public statements on the situation in Michigan.
His appearance was pegged to Daimler's announcement of its investment in the Detroit Diesel plant, which created 115 good, new "union" jobs, the president said. "That's great for this plant, good for this community, but it's also good for American manufacturing."

The president highlighted the plant as a symbol of how American manufacturing and auto industries are rebounding and growing in the new global economy.

"The competitive balance is tipping a little," the president said.

Obama appealed to the audience, which he characterized as middle-class, on the issue of the "fiscal cliff" by warning that the average middle-class family stands to pay $2,200 more in taxes next year if the automatic spending cuts and tax increases go into effect Jan. 1.

The president said America will head into a "downward spiral" if this happens, and placed the onus once again on Republicans to resolve the crisis by agreeing to raise taxes on households making more than $250,000.

"We've got to get past this whole situation where we've manufactured crises because of politics," Obama said.

Obama met Sunday with House Republican Speaker John Boehner, the GOP's lead voice on "fiscal cliff" negotiations, but no details of that conversation have been offered.

White House spokesman Jay Carney, during Monday's briefing on Air Force One en route to Michigan, also would not reveal any information. "I won't characterize yesterday's meeting or other conversations, but the president does believe we can reach an agreement," Carney said.

Griffin
12-10-2012, 10:59 PM
I can see him standing in front of the mirror of the Presidential shitter every morning, scratching his ass and thinking "I can't believe how fucking stupid these Americans are!"

Hugh_Janus
12-10-2012, 10:59 PM
jesus christ....


"What we shouldn't be doing is trying to take away your rights to bargain for better wages," the president told the audience, which immediately roared with cheers, applause and whistles. "These so-called right-to-work laws, they don't have to do with economics, they have everything to do with politics." They're about "giving you the right to work for less money,"

are these people retarded?

Loser
12-11-2012, 05:38 AM
Obama comes from the most unionized shit hole on earth, otherwise known as chicago.

FBD
12-11-2012, 02:18 PM
yup, and high taxes on billionaires making over $250k is going to pay for the difference, too :roll:


...as they roll on to borrowing 46 cents on the dollar...

Acid Trip
12-11-2012, 02:24 PM
I'm so tired of unions and our dumb ass president.

It's OK to force someone to join a Union and OK to force them into paying dues to a political party with which they may not agree.

But it's NOT OK to let people make that choice for themselves.

That's the backward ass world we live in.

FBD
12-11-2012, 02:28 PM
and its okay to have the state make your employer take out union dues, just so that the money laundering is *that* much more efficient.

Godfather
12-11-2012, 03:12 PM
I'm really not up on what the hell this Right to Work is... the president hates it and you guys like it from what I gather?

I just read the other day that RTW workers earn an average of almost $6,000 less per year than free bargaining states.

Acid Trip
12-11-2012, 03:31 PM
I'm really not up on what the hell this Right to Work is... the president hates it and you guys like it from what I gather?

I just read the other day that RTW workers earn an average of almost $6,000 less per year than free bargaining states.

Really? Where did you read that?

Here is a study done on right to work vs non-right to work.

Conventional thinking and anecdotal stories have supported the belief that right to work states fare better than non-right to work states. In addition, businesses view right to work states as locations where companies and employees can benefit from more economic growth. A recent study brings forward very compelling facts that reinforce these beliefs.

The American Legislative Exchange Council recently published research completed by the National Institute for Labor Relations which provides five different forms of tangible information regarding the economic differences between right to work and non-right to work states. The research completed was based upon statistics from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, United States Census Bureau, United States Patent and Research Office and Bureau of Economic Analysis. Five economic factors were analyzed in right to work and non-right to work states in the Midwest, with the following statistical outcomes:

1. Percentage Growth in Non-Farm Private Sector Employees (1995-2005)
a. Right to Work States: 12.9%
b. Non-right to Work States: 6.0%

2. Average Poverty Rate-Adjusted for Cost of Living (2002-2004)
a. Right to Work States: 8.5%
b. Non-right to Work States: 10.1%

3. Percentage Growth in Patents Annually Granted (1995-2005)
a. Right to Work States: 33.0%
b. Non-right to Work States: 11.0%

4. Percentage Growth in Real Personal Income (1995-2005)
a. Right to Work States: 26.0%
b. Non-right to Work States: 19.0%

5. Percentage Growth in Number of People Covered by Employment Based Private Health Insurance (1995-2005):
a. Right to Work States: 8.5%
b. Non-right to Work States: 0.7%

As noted above, right to work states create more private sector jobs, enjoy lower poverty rates, experience more technology development, realize more personal income growth, and increase the number of people covered by employment-based private health insurance. These facts provide public policy thought leaders with compelling information regarding the importance of being a right to work state. Many of the states that are faring most poorly in terms of unemployment rates and economic growth are non-right to work states. Most assuredly, this is not the only reason, but it is an important contributor to these states’ struggles. It is important for state-level policy makers to remove any barriers to economic growth in their state. A non-right to work state changing to a right to work state is an excellent example of how leaders can improve a state’s outlook. Elected officials in non-right to work states should seriously examine this issue and consider the potential benefits to their citizens.

Acid Trip
12-11-2012, 03:35 PM
And here is the difference between right to work vs non-right to work.

Unions: Right-to-Work States vs. Non Right-to-Work States

Do you work in a right-to-work state? A better question may be whether or not you know what that actually means. Although state right-to-work laws affect small businesses throughout the country, many people still aren't sure what they are or how they are affected by them.

A right-to-work state has voluntarily decided to enact laws that require unionized workplaces to become 'open-shops' by securing the right of employees to choose whether or not to join or financially support a union. To understand the background and progression of these laws, it is important to know the key forms of operation in union and non-union workplaces:

Closed Shop workplaces may require union membership as a condition of employment. Employees who do not comply with that condition, fail to pay union dues, or are removed from a union for any other reason are subjected to being fired. The National Labor Relations Act no longer allows the operation of these workplaces.

Union Shop workplaces require employees to join the union after an certain time period. Under the Union Shop rule, employees can be fired for failing to pay membership dues; however, mandatory firing of employees that have been removed from the union for any other reason is not allowed.

Open Shop workplaces allow employees the right to work regardless of their affiliation with a union. Employees cannot be forced to join a union or pay equivalent dues to a union.