PDA

View Full Version : Senate panel says Apple avoids billions in U.S. taxes



Teh One Who Knocks
05-21-2013, 11:16 AM
Kevin McCoy, USA TODAY


http://i.imgur.com/IdmuveD.jpg

Apple, the tech giant that has made a corporate bonanza by selling iPhones, iPads and iPods to consumers worldwide, has avoided tens of billions of dollars in U.S. taxes on its income and profits, according to a Senate report summary issued Monday and swiftly challenged by the firm.

The California-based firm has used a web of offshore entities — including three Ireland subsidiaries that it said don't have tax residency in any country — to cut some of its tax rates to 0.05%, the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations reported.

One of those Apple subsidiaries reported $30 billion in net income for 2009-2012, yet filed no corporate tax return and paid no income taxes to any government during those years, the panel reported in advance of a public hearing set for Tuesday.

Another affiliate received $74 billion in sales income over four years, but paid taxes "on only a tiny fraction of that income," the report said.

Apple also transferred economic rights for some of its intellectual property to its offshore affiliates in low-tax jurisdictions, saving tens of billions of dollars in levies, the Senate panel concluded in its latest look at corporate tax avoidance tactics.

The company then went a step further by using U.S. tax loopholes to avoid federal taxes on $44 billion in otherwise taxable offshore income from the intellectual property rights during the last four years, the report concluded.

"The secret to Apple's business success isn't in the aluminum and the steel and the glass of an iPhone," Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., the panel's chairman, said Monday evening. "The genius is the ideas that bring those elements together in an elegant package. That intangible genius is intellectual property ... nurtured and developed here in the United States. And yet, it ends up that most of the profits are shifted to a tax haven."

Arizona Sen. John McCain, the panel's ranking Republican, said Apple "should not be shifting its profits overseas to avoid the payment of U.S. tax, purposefully depriving the American people of revenue."

In written testimony filed with the subcommittee, Apple said "in accordance with U.S. law," the firm "pays U.S. corporate income taxes on the profits earned from its sales in the U.S. and on the investment income of its controlled foreign corporations."

Insisting it doesn't use "tax gimmicks," Apple said it does not move intellectual property to offshore tax havens and use that structure to sell products in the U.S., thereby ducking domestic taxes. The company, which reported $102.3 billion of its $145 billion in cash was held in offshore affiliates as of March 30, said it has that much money overseas "because it sells the majority of its products outside the U.S."

Apple CEO Tim Cook, CFO Peter Oppenheimer and tax operations chief Phillip Bullock are scheduled to testify at Tuesday's hearing. Cook told The Washington Post last week his testimony would include a proposed "dramatic simplification" of corporate tax laws that would encourage U.S. firms to bring foreign earnings back home for job creation and economic investment.

Apple said it paid $6 billion in federal corporate income taxes during its 2012 fiscal year and expects to pay $7 billion in the current year. Those totals make Apple "likely the largest corporate income tax payer in the U.S," the company said.

Tax-avoidance techniques are commonly used by many large U.S.-based global firms as a legal way to reduce government levies at home and abroad. In a separate study last fall, the Senate panel reported that two other domestic tech giants, Microsoft and Hewlett-Packard, used such strategies to avoid billions in federal taxes.

In its Apple study, the Senate panel reported that Apple for the last decade has operated in Ireland with a specially negotiated tax rate of less than 2%, well below the country's 12% statutory rate.

Apple has several Ireland subsidiaries, including Apple Operations International, its top-tier offshore affiliate, and two sub-affiliates called Apple Operations Europe and Apple Sales International.

Incorporated in 1980, AOI "has no physical presence" in Ireland "or any other address" and doesn't have any employees, the Senate report said. Its board meetings have almost always been held in the U.S., and its assets are managed by an Apple subsidiary in Nevada.

"According to Apple, AOI's net income made up 30% of Apple's total worldwide net profits from 2009-2011, yet Apple also disclosed to the subcommittee that AOI did not pay any corporate income tax to any national government during that period," the report said.

Apple said "it had not determined" whether AOI was managed and controlled in the U.S., which would make its profits taxable, the report said, noting that the subsidiary hadn't filed a corporate tax return in the last five years.

Apple Sales International, ranked below AOI on the corporate flow chart, in 2011 paid $10 million in global taxes on $22 billion of income, the report said. In 2010, ASI paid $7 million in taxes on income totaling $12 billion.

"Those Irish tax payments are so low ... they raise questions about whether ASI is declaring on its Irish tax returns the full amount of income it has received from other Apple affiliates," the report said.

ASI and Apple Operations Europe, the third Ireland affiliate, have research and development cost-sharing agreements with the U.S. parent company, giving them joint ownership of economic rights to Apple's intellectual property offshore, the report said.

That structuring enabled Apple to avoid having worldwide sales revenue related to the rights attributed to the parent firm. Instead, the company arranged for a large portion of the worldwide revenue to be attributed to ASI, which benefits from an Irish tax rate as low as 0.05%, the report said.

Apple also used a tax loophole in the U.S. tax code, the Senate panel said. By checking an IRS tax form box that designated its lower-tier foreign affiliates as "disregarded" entities, the IRS was required to treat the affiliates for tax purposes as part of Apple Operations International, the company's top overseas subsidiary.

Apple used this procedure for offshore affiliates in Europe, Asia and elsewhere, the report said. From 2009-2012, Apple reported that AOI received $29.9 billion in income, mostly from dividends paid by lower-tier overseas affiliates, the report said.

That passive income would normally be taxed. "But by using the check-the-box loopholes, Apple was able to designate the income as coming from disregarded entities. "Once they became part of AOI, their dividend payments ... were no longer taxable passive income," the report said.

The Senate panel recommended strengthening the federal tax code to eliminate incentives for U.S. multinational firms to transfer intellectual property rights to offshore affiliates in low-tax areas.

In other recommendations, the panel called for reforming "check the box" tax rules and imposing current U.S. tax on income earned by any overseas affiliate managed and controlled in the U.S.

Teh One Who Knocks
05-21-2013, 01:37 PM
By ALAN FARNHAM - ABC News


Apple and congressional investigators both tried to get in a preemptive kidney-punch or two in advance of Apple CEO Tim Cook's testimony later today in Washington on the way Apple avoids paying U.S. taxes on money it earns overseas.

Apple released an advance copy of Cook's testimony Monday night. Its 17 pages of self-defense are clear, blunt, unambiguous: Apple, Cook declares, "does not use tax gimmicks." It pays "an extraordinary amount" in U.S. taxes -- nearly $6 billion last year, making it "likely the largest corporate income tax payer in the U.S." Its effective tax rate last year, he says, was approximately 30.5 percent.

Cook implies that Congress, intent on removing a speck (figuratively speaking) from Apple's eye, may perhaps have overlooked the 2-by-4 in its own: an outdated tax code.

"Apple," he says, "welcomes an objective examination of the U.S. corporate tax system, which has not kept pace with the advent of the digital age and the rapidly changing global economy."

He then goes on to recommend reforms.

Referring to the way Apple manages to lessen its U.S. tax bill by moving money around overseas, he concludes: "While some Subcommittee members may have differing views on these tax policy matters, Apple hopes the Subcommittee will see that these recommendations aim to create meaningful change and go well beyond what most U.S. companies propose."

As for the Subcommittee, on Monday night it released a 40-page memorandum, which, after a 16-page highlights-reel, gets down to business, asserting that Apple has used a variety of "offshore structures, arrangements, and transactions to shift billions of dollars in profits away from the United States and into Ireland, where Apple has negotiated a special corporate tax rate of less than 2 percent."

"One of Apple's more unusual tactics," says the Subcommittee, has been "to establish and direct substantial funds to offshore entities that are not declared tax residents of any jurisdiction."

These entities are, in effect, corporate men-of-the-world.

One such entity, Apple Operations International, says the memo, is currently sauntering about with $30 billion in its pocket. Yet, during the four years during which it earned that sum, it "paid no corporate income taxes to any national government."

While the subcommittee stops short of accusing Apple of having broken any U.S. law, it finds the company to have circumvented the U.S. Tax Code's Subpart F, whose purpose is "to prevent multinational corporations from shifting profits to tax havens to avoid U.S. tax."

So adroitly has Apple peeled Subpart F, says the memo, that from 2009 to 2012, it managed to avoid "$44 billion in taxes on otherwise taxable offshore income."

On Monday, ABC News quoted Sen. John McCain as saying: "Apple claims to be the largest U.S. corporate tax payer, but by sheer size and scale, it is also among America's largest tax avoiders."

Subcommittee chairman Sen. Carl Levin, speaking Monday with reporters, said that while Apple might be a golden goose, it had played fast and loose with some of its eggs.

"It's like saying you haven't shifted the golden eggs offshore," Levin said, "after you've shifted the golden goose offshore."

Richard Cranium
05-21-2013, 01:40 PM
This is just Hussain O'Bamas way of saying Apple isn't donating enough to his never ending campaign.

redred
05-21-2013, 01:48 PM
they have an app for tax avoidance :tup:

Acid Trip
05-21-2013, 02:51 PM
The tax code is written/modified by the House of Representatives. Since 1925 the Democrats have controlled the house 80% of the time. Now you know who is responsible for a majority of the tax code.

Ironic considering it's Democrats who are blaming Apple for not paying enough taxes. If you didn't want there to be so many loopholes maybe you shouldn't have put them in in the first place!