PDA

View Full Version : Outrage Over Accused Fort Hood Shooter's $300K Pay Spurs Legislation



Teh One Who Knocks
07-23-2013, 05:41 PM
By NED BERKOWITZ - ABC News


http://i.imgur.com/Rsjtul0.jpg

For the nearly four years since Army Maj. Nidal Hasan allegedly gunned down more than a dozen American servicemen, U.S. taxpayers have continued to pay his salary -- to the tune of around $300,000 so far. But new legislation, called the "Stop Pay for Violent Offenders Act" and introduced Monday in the House of Representatives, would authorize the military to suspend pay for Hasan and other members of the military for any capital or sex-related offense.

Current law allows the military to suspend the pay of civilian employees, but an Army spokesperson told ABC News last month that it cannot stop paying Hasan, who is still officially in the Army, at his usual pay grade unless he's convicted. Hasan has admitted to shooting his fellow soldiers, saying in June that the Nov. 5, 2009 attack on Fort Hood in Texas was done in the "defense of others," in his case, the Taliban. Hasan has repeatedly refused to enter a plea, so earlier this month the military pleaded "not guilty" for him.

While Hasan continues to draw about $80,000 per year, many of the Fort Hood victims say they've been denied financial and medical benefits due to the military's refusal to categorize the massacre as an act of terrorism, instead discussing it as "workplace violence."

In addition to his recent admission about his support for the Taliban, soon after the shooting, evidence emerged showing that Hasan was in communication with al Qaeda leader Anwar al-Awlaki prior to the attack. But in a letter in late May, a top Army attorney said that "the available evidence in this case does not, at this time, support a finding that the shooting at Fort Hood was an act of international terrorism."

The new legislation is cosponsored by Rep. Frank Wolf (R-Virg.), Rep. Tim Griffin (R-Ark.), and Rep. Tom Rooney (R-Fla.), who served in the military at Fort Hood before entering politics.

Griffin says it's "particularly troubling" that the Hasan case has taken so long to come to trial, enabling the alleged shooter to draw his salary for such a long time.

After many delays, Hasan's trial is set to get under way on August 6. He is charged with premeditated murder and attempted murder. He is acting as his own attorney, but according to Wolf, the military is footing the bill for legal advisors to assist him in his defense.

According to local news reports, Hasan's court martial has cost the Army about $4 million in personnel and other expenditures.

The new legislation, which also targets those accused of sex-related crimes, comes after recent Congressional hearings derided the military's response to sexual assaults. A recent Pentagon survey found that an estimated 26,000 sexual assaults took place last year.

deebakes
07-23-2013, 05:57 PM
wtf kind of loopholes are there?!?!?! :x

Richard Cranium
07-23-2013, 10:01 PM
the military's refusal to categorize the massacre as an act of terrorism, instead discussing it as "workplace violence."

It's not the military, its that fucking worthless O'Bama and his corrupt asshole attorny general.

Southern Belle
07-23-2013, 10:30 PM
Terrorism.

RBP
07-23-2013, 11:03 PM
Are you fucking kidding me? This makes my blood fucking boil on two fronts. Cut the fucker off and let him sue for the back pay, but yes change that rule. Jesus. Secondly, not an act of terrorism? That was a political decision. wtf?

RBP
07-23-2013, 11:05 PM
Wait, is this motherfucker is civilian court??? why??

RBP
07-23-2013, 11:14 PM
Ok, military court.



FORT HOOD, Texas — A jury was selected Tuesday to hear the case against an Army psychiatrist accused in the Fort Hood shooting, whose long-awaited murder trial is set to begin next month.

The panel comprising 13 officers will hear the case against Maj. Nidal Hasan, who is charged with 13 counts of premeditated murder and 32 counts of attempted premeditated murder. Hasan faces the death penalty if convicted in the November 2009 attack at the Central Texas Army post.

There are nine colonels, three lieutenant colonels and one major on the panel, the Killeen Daily Herald reported. They were brought in from Army posts nationwide for questioning.

Two officers on the panel have said they are skeptical about the death penalty, the Austin American-Statesman reported. They did not appear to feel as strongly about capital punishment as two other officers who were dismissed Tuesday.

Col. Tara Osborn, the military judge overseeing the court-martial, agreed to dismiss one officer who admitted he had already decided on whether Hasan was guilty.

Prosecutors used their lone challenge to strike the second dismissed officer, the Statesman reported.

Death penalty cases in the military require at least 12 jurors, more than in other cases. All members of the panel must approve a death sentence.

Hasan is serving as his own attorney. He did not use his challenge and asked only a few questions of potential jurors, including asking one colonel about whether he felt he would be disobeying God or his church by imposing the death penalty.

He wore a camouflage uniform worn by troops in combat, not the dress uniform usually worn by defendants in a court-martial. He also has kept a beard that he says is an expression of his Muslim faith, though it violates Army rules on grooming.

Hasan recently told Osborn that he killed U.S. troops at the Army post because they posed an imminent threat to Taliban leaders in Afghanistan – a strategy known as "defense of others." Osborn earlier rejected that argument and refused to allow him to ask potential jurors questions related to it.

The trial is set to start Aug. 6.

PorkChopSandwiches
07-23-2013, 11:36 PM
It's not the military, its that fucking worthless O'Bama and his corrupt asshole attorny general.

Yes, I'm sure he made this law

Richard Cranium
07-24-2013, 12:04 AM
"the military's refusal to categorize the massacre as an act of terrorism, instead discussing it as "workplace violence."


Yes, I'm sure he made this law

What law are you refering to? My comment had nothing to do with any law.

RBP
07-24-2013, 12:06 AM
Yes, I'm sure he made this law

You're mixing subjects. I agree that the pay rule is not an administration issue, but RC was referring to the decision that this was not an "act of terrorism" which is an administration decision and appears to me also to be purely politically motivated.

PorkChopSandwiches
07-24-2013, 03:51 PM
"the military's refusal to categorize the massacre as an act of terrorism, instead discussing it as "workplace violence."



What law are you refering to? My comment had nothing to do with any law.

My bad, I had a muddy moment :lol: