PDA

View Full Version : GOP bill would ban using food stamp funds on junk food



Teh One Who Knocks
09-12-2013, 12:07 PM
Eric Pfeiffer, Yahoo! News


Newly proposed legislation in Congress would ban recipients of food stamps from buying junk food.

The Hill reports that a bill proposed by Rep. Phil Roe, R-Tenn., would require food stamp recipients to purchase only healthy food.

The Healthy Food Choices Act, H.R. 3073 is the latest salvo from Republican members of Congress who have criticized the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), also known as food stamps or the Women, Infants and Children program (WIC).

In August, it was reported that House Republicans hoped to cut some $40 billion from future SNAP budgets.

Roe’s legislation is specifically in response to a 2012 study, which showed that recipients from the food stamp fund spend approximately $2 billion a year on junk food.

“As a physician, I realize the importance of healthy eating, and as an obstetrician, I’ve seen how the WIC program helps empower families receiving assistance to use taxpayer dollars to purchase healthy, wholesome foods,” Roe said in a statement published on his congressional site. “If these guidelines are good and healthy enough for women and children, then SNAP recipients should also benefit from adhering to the same standards.”

In June, Roe voted in favor of proposed legislation that would apply work to welfare standards to food stamp fund recipients.

Critics of Roe’s proposal say that the tighter nutritional requirements would actually be more of a burden for low-income individuals and families who rely on SNAP funds. They also point out that Roe previously opposed efforts by first lady Michelle Obama to improve national school lunch nutritional standards.

Roe’s bill would require SNAP food purchases to adhere to the same nutritional guidelines required under the WIC program. But some critics have said that even WIC’s requirements are not based on science and need fine-tuning to ensure they are nutritionally sound.

Still, Roe said his intention is to improve the health of SNAP recipients by helping to ensure that they eat more nutritious meals with their funds.

“Already states like Wisconsin and South Carolina have shown interest in improving the healthfulness of choices in their SNAP programs,” Roe said. “By giving SNAP recipients more nutritious choices, we can take a meaningful step towards ending hunger in America.”

RBP
09-12-2013, 12:18 PM
When one orange costs the same as a box of little debbie snack cakes and you have 4 kids, the snack cakes win.

Muddy
09-12-2013, 12:19 PM
When one orange costs the same as a box of little debbie snack cakes and you have 4 kids, the snack cakes win.

Where are you buying oranges? :lol:

DemonGeminiX
09-12-2013, 12:20 PM
Drown the kids and keep the orange.

:tup:

Teh One Who Knocks
09-12-2013, 12:22 PM
When one orange costs the same as a box of little debbie snack cakes and you have 4 kids, the snack cakes win.

When you are spending your own money on junk food, I don't care, but when you are spending MY money on junk food, then there's a problem.

Wanna buy snack cakes? Get a job.

RBP
09-13-2013, 03:53 AM
When you are spending your own money on junk food, I don't care, but when you are spending MY money on junk food, then there's a problem.

Wanna buy snack cakes? Get a job.

That's fine hyperbole, but you already know that most food stamps recipients already have jobs. In fact, you have commented that you'd rather supplement low wage employment with food stamps than pay welfare to someone not working.

Having said that, there is a problem with the economics of nutritional diets. They are more expensive than cheap processed foods. And fresh foods are outrageous in comparison. I don't disagree with you in principle, but I also don't fault a poor family for buying cheap food. That's just the way the system is set up. Eliminating less nutritional food isn't a bad idea, as long as there are nutritional alternatives to take their place at the same price.

My example wasn't supporting the idea. It was simply pointing out that economically, the deck is stacked against nutrition for low income families. They aren't buying the better-for-you fresh fish filets at $10 a pound and organic whole grain pasta. They are buying fish sticks and generic mac and cheese.

Acid Trip
09-13-2013, 05:05 PM
Canned fruit/vegetables, beans, pasta, tuna, eggs, and rice are all incredibly cheap for the life sustaining nutrition they provide.

Just because fresh food is expensive doesn't mean low cost, healthy alternatives aren't available.

deebakes
09-13-2013, 05:52 PM
Here in minnesota, the WIC program is for certain items, not a general "dollar" type certificate. You get a certificate for milk, cheese, etc. That way you only can use your stamps for certain items :shrug:

Muddy
09-13-2013, 06:38 PM
Here in minnesota, the WIC program is for certain items, not a general "dollar" type certificate. You get a certificate for milk, cheese, etc. That way you only can use your stamps for certain items :shrug:

Same here.

KevinD
09-13-2013, 10:52 PM
As I remember it, years and years ago, people on WIC/welfare actually got FOOD from the government (speaking of, that government cheese was the best I'd ever tasted)

My problem is not so much "junk" food, as it is that here in Texas, the folks with the Star (I think that's what it is?) can buy anything at the grocery or convenience (some) stores, including candy, beer, cigs etc.