PDA

View Full Version : Middle school ban on memorial T-shirts backfires



Teh One Who Knocks
11-13-2013, 12:16 PM
by Justin A. Hinkley - Battle Creek Enquirer


http://i.imgur.com/lyR0Bph.jpg

Several parents and students were upset Monday when Lakeview Middle School barred students from wearing T-shirts honoring a classmate who died Saturday after a long battle with cancer.

Lakeview sixth-grader Caitlyn Jackson, 12, died late Saturday at a hospital in Ann Arbor after fighting leukemia for years. Many in Lakeview had rallied around the girl over that time.

On Monday, at least a dozen students showed up in orange or blue shirts, many bearing Caitlyn’s name. Blue was Caitlyn’s favorite color and orange is the official color honoring leukemia victims (Caitlyn also was a University of Tennessee fan). Some students decorated shirts over the weekend, while others wore shirts they’d picked up at the many fundraisers and other benefits they’d worked in Caitlyn’s honor.

But, as students arrived in the memorial shirts Monday morning, school administrators asked them to change the shirts, turn them inside out, or put duct tape over Caitlyn’s name.

Melinda Jackson, Caitlyn’s mother, said she heard about the t-shirt ban on her way home from Ann Arbor.

“That hurt me to the point that I didn’t think I could be hurt anymore,” Melinda Jackson said Monday evening.

Jackson is a Lakeview employee, working as a childcare provider.

Students and parents expressed outrage at the district‘s decision to block the memorial effort.

After Monday’s uproar, the district decided late in the day that students would be allowed to wear the shirts Tuesday.

Lakeview administrators made the decision Sunday night that they wouldn’t allow T-shirts, but did not notify parents, said Amy Jones, the Lakeview finance director acting as district chief while Superintendent Dave Peterson is out of the country exploring a possible student exchange program.

Jones said the district’s decision was based on its “crisis management plan,” which she said is “based on a lot of research and expert opinion.” The plan specifically bars “permanent memorials” on the research-backed belief that memorials can remind students of their grief and, for some, can make it worse.

Chuck Crider, a retired school administrator helping the district out while Peterson and others are out of the country, said the T-shirts were interpreted as a more permanent memorial.

“The intent was designed to protect the interests of all children,” Jones said.

She said students were allowed to make cards for the family, and students wearing blue and orange shirts without Caitlyn’s name on them were not asked to change them. Jones said those actions were allowed because students could participate “in private and by choice,” while students couldn’t help but see the writing on other shirts in class.

Jones said the situation was handled “compassionately.” She said, for example, that students who were asked to turn their shirts inside-out were told to keep Caitlyn’s name “close to their heart.”

“They said that they really liked the shirts, but that it just triggered too much emotion for someone who was really close to her,” said 13-year-old student Alyssa Jaynes.

District officials acknowleged Monday their good intentions backfired.

“Certainly the intent of our decision was good,” Jones said. “Probably the ramifications of our decision caused more disruption than if we had let kids wear the shirts in the first place.”

Officials met with Caitlyn’s family Monday afternoon and promised to review the policies that led to the ban. Jones said future tributes would likely still be handled on a case-by-case basis. She said research is clear, for example, that images of suicide victims in schools can do more harm to students than good, and would probably not be allowed.

Crider said one of the best pieces of advice the district received was to reach out to the family of the deceased and ask them what they wanted from the school community.

And Jones, conceding that “hindsight is 20-20,” said the district should better communicate expectations with parents ahead of time.

On Facebook, some parents were calling for the ouster of those who made the decision to ban the shirts.

While some students said they were sent to the office and at least one girl said she received a lunchtime detention over the shirt, district officials said no administrative discipline was issued.

But students said the damage had already been done.

“It made feel really bad that I couldn’t express myself for Caitlyn,” said 11-year-old Jaidyn Bellinger, the student who said she received a lunchtime detention over her shirt. “I wanted to let people know how bad it feels to lose someone like that.”

FBD
11-13-2013, 12:51 PM
“The intent was designed to protect the interests of all children,” Jones said.

you piece of shit, its NOT in the interests of the children to mourn their dead fucking friend!?!?!?!?!?!?! wtf!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Muddy
11-13-2013, 02:38 PM
Yeah man.. I just don't get why some of these blatantly bad decisions are made sometimes..

MrsM
11-13-2013, 02:45 PM
Yeah man.. I just don't get why some of these blatantly bad decisions are made sometimes..

because some officials are looking at memos that are sent to them by people who have their head up their ass. Since everyone is too afraid of being sued for saying the wrong thing or doing something that may offend someone, they tend to enact asinine policies so they can hide behind the policy and not actually make any decisions based on the actual event.

Noilly Pratt
11-13-2013, 04:00 PM
you piece of shit, its NOT in the interests of the children to mourn their dead fucking friend!?!?!?!?!?!?! wtf!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Better than burying the grief, and having it come out later in destructive ways. Grief is a necessary thing in the process. We honour our dead when we grieve.

If I was the principal of the school I'd call an assembly and just talk about her...have an open mic for those who want to speak, and stress that there is no wrong way to grieve, if they want to say nothing and close their eyes, that's OK too.

Muddy
11-13-2013, 04:11 PM
Better than burying the grief, and having it come out later in destructive ways. Grief is a necessary thing in the process. We honour our dead when we grieve.

If I was the principal of the school I'd call an assembly and just talk about her...have an open mic for those who want to speak, and stress that there is no wrong way to grieve, if they want to say nothing and close their eyes, that's OK too.

Did you get that idea from breaking bad? :mrgreen:

Hal-9000
11-13-2013, 04:57 PM
Yes we don't need to teach children to compartmentalize grief...it's a learning process for kids and they need to feel sorrow, understand it's serious, not a game and then move past it

Noilly Pratt
11-13-2013, 05:23 PM
Did you get that idea from breaking bad? :mrgreen:

I've honestly never watched it. Got that from grieving myself. Each time was different, and learnt that there are no wrong moves other than denial.

All I know about BB, I've learned from here...:shock: :)

PorkChopSandwiches
11-13-2013, 05:34 PM
:wtf: :IHate:

Muddy
11-13-2013, 05:42 PM
I've honestly never watched it. Got that from grieving myself. Each time was different, and learnt that there are no wrong moves other than denial.

All I know about BB, I've learned from here...:shock: :)

There was a scene where an airline crash happened in the town and bodys and debris flung all in peoples yard.. They had a mass grieving session in the gym and one of the lead characters made a petty interesting speech about his thoughts and they took the mic. from him.. :lol: good stuff.

Hal-9000
11-13-2013, 05:57 PM
I've honestly never watched it. Got that from grieving myself. Each time was different, and learnt that there are no wrong moves other than denial.

All I know about BB, I've learned from here...:shock: :)


:shock:


: disowned :

and hand in your Canadian card on the way out

Goofy
11-13-2013, 08:01 PM
She said research is clear, for example, that images of suicide victims in schools can do more harm to students than good, and would probably not be allowed.


And? Stupid analogy by a stupid person.