PDA

View Full Version : Italian government up in arms over use of Michelangelo's 'David' in gun ad



Teh One Who Knocks
03-10-2014, 10:53 AM
FOX News


http://i.imgur.com/9szacTS.jpg

An Illinois-based gunmaker has incurred the wrath of the Italian government after using Michelangelo's famous sculpture of the Biblical hero David in an advertisement for one of its rifles.

The advertisement for Armalite's AR-501A shows David holding the gun in lieu of his famous slingshot. The ad's tagline reads "AR-501A: A Work of Art". The ad also alters the statue itself, covering up David's genitalia with a leaf. The real statue makes no such concession to modesty.

Italian Culture Minister Dario Franceschini urged the company to withdraw the advertisement after images of it appeared on several Italian media websites over the weekend. Franceschini tweeted "The image of David, armed, offends and infringes the law. We will take action against the American company so that it immediately withdraws its campaign."

The Italian government claims that it has the copyright to all commercial uses of the marble masterpiece, which was created between 1501 and 1504 and resides in the Accademia Gallery in Florence. The gallery's director, Angelo Tartuferi, told Repubblica newspaper "The law says that the aesthetic value of the work cannot be distorted. In this case, not only is the choice in bad taste but also completely illegal."

Armalite has not made any public comment on the controversy.

Hal-9000
03-10-2014, 11:00 PM
yep if there's a copyright on the piece it's not only a crappy thing to do, it be illegal


kinda like using the Mona Lisa in a tampon ad..

deebakes
03-10-2014, 11:28 PM
http://i.imgur.com/lpicKwE.jpg

Hal-9000
03-11-2014, 06:50 PM
no way that was an off hand example :lol:

Teh One Who Knocks
03-11-2014, 06:52 PM
yep if there's a copyright on the piece it's not only a crappy thing to do, it be illegal


kinda like using the Mona Lisa in a tampon ad..

I'm pretty sure there's no copyright on a 500 year old sculpture :-k

Plus, there is artistic license that is allowed in advertising and whatnot that would make it within the law, even if there was some kind of copyright on it.

Hal-9000
03-11-2014, 06:55 PM
I'm pretty sure there's no copyright on a 500 year old sculpture :-k

Plus, there is artistic license that is allowed in advertising and whatnot that would make it within the law, even if there was some kind of copyright on it.

I think they own the copyright on the piece, as in, not using it for commercial purposes to make money without giving them a piece of the $$

FBD
03-11-2014, 08:44 PM
illegal? :lol: insulting the koran is illegal in places too :roll: