PDA

View Full Version : New Rover Image Capturing Beam Of Light May Prove Life Exists On Mars



Teh One Who Knocks
04-09-2014, 11:28 AM
By Dominic Kelly - Opposing Views


A NASA rover on Mars captured what some say appears to be a beam of artificial light radiating out from the ground, and while the source of the light is unconfirmed, many believe it could be proof of life on the red planet.

The photo was snapped last week by one of the two rovers currently cruising around the planet, and as Scott C. Waring of UFO Sightings Daily points out, the beam of light could help prove the existence of life on Mars.

http://i.imgur.com/OHa664q.jpg

"This could indicate there is intelligent life below the ground and uses light as we do," wrote Waring in his observation. "This is not a glare from the sun, nor is it an artifact of the photo process."

The Curiosity rover is currently exploring an area of the planet known as the Kimberley. At the Kimberley, the rover can explore rocks and the overall environment that may lead to figuring out whether there was life there in ancient times.

http://i.imgur.com/GwLy9rn.jpg

"This is the spot on the map we've been headed for, on a little rise that gives us a great view for context imaging of the outcrops at the Kimberley," said Melissa Rice of the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena in a press release.

From the beginning, the Curiosity rover was always meant to make it to the Kimberley, which got its name from a place of the same name in Australia, and scientists hope that being there will help them figure out what past environmental conditions were like and whether or not they were ideal for life.

In the meantime, many are continuing to speculate what this beam of light could prove, if anything at all.

http://i.imgur.com/Lv8uCuZ.jpg

DemonGeminiX
04-09-2014, 11:33 AM
It couldn't just be a shiny rock or something?

Teh One Who Knocks
04-09-2014, 11:35 AM
http://i.imgur.com/XozL4tg.jpg

deebakes
04-09-2014, 12:37 PM
:tinfoil:

Acid Trip
04-09-2014, 01:46 PM
Doesn't look like a beam of anything. It's prolly a Coke bottle they shot into space 20 years ago.

Griffin
04-09-2014, 01:53 PM
http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/bottle_6767.jpg

Noilly Pratt
04-09-2014, 02:38 PM
http://i59.tinypic.com/xpzm36.jpg

PorkChopSandwiches
04-09-2014, 03:40 PM
:twizone:

Acid Trip
04-09-2014, 07:55 PM
http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/bottle_6767.jpg

:lol: Exactly!

Griffin
04-09-2014, 08:02 PM
The Gods Must Be Crazy
If anyone hasn't seen it, here is the whole movie.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5QPL757PPU

DemonGeminiX
04-10-2014, 01:38 AM
Could just be a part that they used to transport the crawlers themselves? Something that was jettisoned during entry?

Oofty Goofty
04-10-2014, 02:21 AM
It couldn't just be a shiny rock or something?

No, if it's something that can't be explained immediately, it must be aliens

Godfather
04-10-2014, 05:15 AM
It couldn't just be a shiny rock or something?

I think NASA already debunked it, their other camera took a picture and saw nothing or something like that. I don't remember exactly, it was pretty simple explanation

deebakes
04-10-2014, 12:46 PM
of course they would debunk it, they also claim to have put a man on the moon :tinfoil:

FBD
04-10-2014, 12:51 PM
:lol: funny we had the technology to make it but not to fake it back then

Teh One Who Knocks
04-10-2014, 12:59 PM
http://i.imgur.com/Ibgre6u.jpg

FBD
04-10-2014, 01:43 PM
:D


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_loUDS4c3Cs

Hal-9000
04-10-2014, 04:04 PM
durrh, it's a Starbucks sign

Godfather
04-11-2014, 02:43 AM
:lol: funny we had the technology to make it but not to fake it back then

Didn't someone do the math and work out that faking it back then would have actually cost more than the real trip :lol:

FBD
04-11-2014, 03:26 PM
:lol: it would have - like the guy in the vid mentioned, we were already real hot on developing all this dick waving rocket technology, so in that regard the money was already spent. but the big big thing is what millions of people watched on TV - the tech didnt exist to fudge 143 minutes straight, on film.

and considering what those disc recorders used to cost...for example, one of the grage artifacts left over from the yeti is this ge color film camera, from the mid 1950s, was one of the very first pieces of equipment you could play a film through and the 5 cameras and glass/mirror arrangement in the thing split all of the vid signal to I believe RGB, coax outs - that fuggin thing cost like $750k back in those days. the tech is so primitive on it, it aint even funny.