PDA

View Full Version : Sexting among Barrington students leads to child porn charges



RBP
05-02-2014, 12:58 AM
Two teen boys have been charged with felony possession of child pornography after allegedly sending sexually explicit images and videos to fellow students at Barrington Middle School-Station Campus.

One boy was charged Wednesday while the other was charged Thursday, Barrington police said. Police will not release the ages or names of the boys.

The charges come after the teens allegedly shared sexually explicit videos and photographs of at least one classmate from the Barrington school, police said. The distribution involved multiple students and recipients, police added.

Taking questions after school Thursday, Principal Craig Winkelman said a small group of eighth-grade students were involved. When asked whether more than one student was victimized, he said “there were several students involved.”

After investigating, school officials determined the photos and videos were intended to be private among the group. Winkelman said that changed when a couple of students decided to share them with others at the school.

One of the boys began distributing the sexually explicit material on April 2 while the other sent out photos and videos on April 28 and March 30, a police spokeswoman said.

Winkelman said students alerted school leaders and some parents when those photos began to circulate widely.

“We’ve continued to work with all the students and their parents that were directly involved,” Winkelman said.
Barbara Harris said her eighth-grade son told her about the sexting before the news broke. Her son said students were being interviewed, phones were being taken away and that he was not involved.

She applauded the school district’s response and willingness to keep parents informed.

The two boys who are facing child pornography charges were released to their families and will be petitioned into Cook County Juvenile Court, according to a statement from the Barrington Police Department.

“Some situations in the life of a school district require a balance between care and compassion, consequence and correction. This is not an easy equation and often relates to an unfortunate incident. Such is the case with a small group of adolescents who clearly did not respect or understand the repercussions of risky online behaviors when using their technology,” District 220 officials wrote in a statement following the charges. “These students and their parents find themselves in a severe situation. Their futures may be forever stamped by the careless use of an app, the tease of a text message, the unthinking post of an indecent photo. In this case, the permanence of the Internet may be enough evidence to secure a Class 2 Felony conviction in the juvenile courts. The ‘delete’ button can never fully erase the reach of social media.”

Barrington School District 220 has made counseling available and hosted educational sessions about sexting and social media. Additional programs have been scheduled, including a presentation May 20 from Melissa Hemzacek of the Illinois Attorney General’s High-Tech Crime Bureau. Geared to parents and students, the session will begin at 6:30 p.m. in the Station Middle School commons.

At 9 a.m. May 21, LINK Barrington will host a parent coffee and panel discussion in the Guidance Resource Center at Barrington High School for a more in-depth conversation about the topic of Internet safety and sexting.

Winkelman repeated that parents should talk with their kids about sexting.

“If you haven’t talked to your students about it yet, then this gives you a tangible thing to then bring up the conversation, something to point to,” he said. “It’s an actual example instead of just saying, ‘this can happen to you.’”

District 220, the state’s attorney’s office and the Children’s Advocacy Center in Cook County have assisted police in the investigation.

========================================

:facepalm:

The boys are child pornographers and the girls are victims. :tup:

deebakes
05-02-2014, 01:16 AM
was it pictures of girls or what? i assume so, but it is not clear in the article (or i just read the headline :oops: )

RBP
05-02-2014, 01:34 AM
was it pictures of girls or what? i assume so, but it is not clear in the article (or i just read the headline :oops: )

I agree that the details are somewhat unclear, but after reading several accounts, this is what I have gathered. A group of students were exchanging naked pictures with the intent that it stay among the group. Two of the boys sent pictures of the girls to a wider group, resulting in the boys being charged for possession and distribution of child porn.

The girls that created the child porn are described as victims.

deebakes
05-02-2014, 02:06 AM
were they also described as "hot" ? :-k

RBP
05-02-2014, 02:12 AM
were they also described as "hot" ? :-k

8th grade, Dee. 8-t-h g-r-a-d-e. :|

deebakes
05-02-2014, 02:34 AM
that's like 17, right? :-k

RBP
05-02-2014, 03:18 AM
that's like 17, right? :-k

:slap:

13 I would guess.

deebakes
05-02-2014, 04:06 AM
so then no, they are not hot then :shrug:

RBP
05-02-2014, 04:10 AM
so then no, they are not hot then :shrug:

Unless you subscribe to "grass on the infield... play ball!" then no.

Teh One Who Knocks
05-02-2014, 10:40 AM
Unless you subscribe to "grass on the infield... play ball!" then no.

If they're old enough to go to the store, they're old enough to get bread :hand:


















































:coat:

RBP
05-02-2014, 12:01 PM
If they're old enough to go to the store, they're old enough to get bread :hand:

:coat:

But not fried chicken!

FBD
05-02-2014, 12:28 PM
:lol:




agree completely rbp...what happened to treating people equally? what, did this only become not ok when the 2 boys sent it outside the original group?

Hal-9000
05-02-2014, 03:04 PM
that's like 17, right? :-k


:giggity:

RBP
05-02-2014, 03:15 PM
:lol:




agree completely rbp...what happened to treating people equally? what, did this only become not ok when the 2 boys sent it outside the original group?

Indeed. If it's child porn it's child porn. They can't say it's not illegal at the point of production but it is illegal when it gets down stream. That's completely illogical.

Teh One Who Knocks
05-02-2014, 03:21 PM
But not fried chicken!

:confused:

RBP
05-02-2014, 05:17 PM
:confused:

http://www.tehfalloutshelter.com/showthread.php?t=59465
Teenager told he is 'too young' to buy box of CHICKEN by KFC staff who said the boy and his brother might 'mess about' and 'throw food' if they were served

Muddy
05-02-2014, 05:24 PM
http://www.tehfalloutshelter.com/showthread.php?t=59465
Teenager told he is 'too young' to buy box of CHICKEN by KFC staff who said the boy and his brother might 'mess about' and 'throw food' if they were served

Don't start it mother plucker.. :lol:

http://i.imgur.com/IDmWwdq.jpg