PDA

View Full Version : House Majority Leader Cantor defeated in primary



Muddy
06-11-2014, 09:54 PM
Listen, you can't believe half of the facts in this story.. There is so much speculation and spin surrounding this right now..

http://i.imgur.com/4ICXYE5.jpg
picture of Eric Cantors ass..

http://i.imgur.com/9J0dnBC.jpg





RICHMOND, Va. (AP) -- In an upset for the ages, Majority Leader Eric Cantor of Virginia, the second-most powerful man in the House, was dethroned Tuesday by a little-known, tea party-backed Republican primary challenger carried to victory on a wave of public anger over calls for looser immigration laws.

"This is a miracle from God that just happened," exulted David Brat, an economics professor, as his victory became clear in the congressional district around Virginia's capital city.

Speaking to downcast supporters, Cantor conceded, "Obviously we came up short" in a bid for renomination to an eighth term.

The victory was by far the biggest of the 2014 campaign season for tea party forces, although last week they forced veteran Mississippi Sen. Thad Cochran into a June 24 runoff, and hope state Sen. Chris McDaniel can prevail then.

Cantor's defeat was the first primary setback for a senior leader in Congress in recent years. Former House Speaker Thomas Foley of Washington and Senate Democratic leader Tom Daschle of South Dakota both lost their seats at the polls in the past two decades, but they fell to Republicans, not to challengers from within their own parties.

The outcome may well mark the end of Cantor's political career, and aides did not respond Tuesday night when asked if the majority leader, 51, would run a write-in campaign in the fall.

But its impact on the fate of immigration legislation in the current Congress seemed clearer still. Conservatives will now be emboldened in their opposition to legislation to create a path to citizenship for immigrants living in the country illegally, and party leaders who are more sympathetic to such legislation will likely be less willing to try.

The majority leader had been tugged by two warring forces in his party and in recent weeks sought to emphasize his opposition to far-reaching immigration legislation as Brat's challenge gained force. Last month, a feisty crowd of Brat supporters booed Cantor in front of his family at a local party convention.

Still, neither he nor other House leaders betrayed any serious concern that his tenure was in danger, and his allies leaked a private poll in recent days that claimed he had a comfortable lead over Brat.

In the end, despite help from establishment groups, Cantor's repudiation was complete in an area that first sent him to Congress in 2000.

With votes counted in 99 percent of the precincts, 64,418 votes were cast, roughly a 37 percent increase over two years ago.

Despite that, Cantor polled fewer votes than he did in 2012 - 28,631 this time, compared with 37,369 then.

House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, issued a statement hailing Cantor as "a good friend and a great leader, and someone I've come to rely upon on a daily basis as we make the tough choices that come with governing."

It was unclear if Cantor intended to remain in his leadership post for the duration of the year or who might replace him in the new Congress if Republicans hold their majority.

Democrats seized on the upset as evidence that their fight for House control this fall is far from over.

"Eric Cantor has long been the face of House Republicans' extreme policies, debilitating dysfunction and manufactured crises. Tonight is a major victory for the tea party as they yet again pull the Republican Party further to the radical right," said the Democratic leader, Nancy Pelosi of California. "As far as the midterm elections are concerned, it's a whole new ballgame."

Cantor was appointed to his first leadership position in 2002, when he was named chief deputy whip of the party and became the highest-ranking Jewish Republican in Washington. It was a recognition of his fundraising skills as well as his conservative voting record at a time Republican leaders were eager to tap into Jewish donors for their campaigns. Since Boehner became speaker in 2009, Cantor has been seen as both a likely eventual successor and at times a potential rival.

Jay S. Poole, a Cantor volunteer, said Brat tapped into widespread frustration among voters about the gridlock in Washington and issues such as immigration. "I can't tell you how amazing this is to me," Poole said.

Much of the campaign centered on immigration, where critics on both sides of the debate have recently taken aim at Cantor. Brat accused him of being a top cheerleader for "amnesty" for immigrants who are living in the U.S. illegally. Cantor responded forcefully by boasting in mailers of blocking Senate plans "to give illegal aliens amnesty."

It was a change in tone for Cantor, who has repeatedly voiced support for giving citizenship to certain immigrants brought illegally to the country as children. Cantor and House GOP leaders have advocated a step-by-step approach, rather than the comprehensive bill backed by the Senate - but were persistently vague on the details.

Brat teaches at Randolph-Macon College, a small liberal arts school north of Richmond. He raised just over $200,000 for his campaign, while Cantor spent more than $1 million in April and May alone to try to beat back his challenge.

Washington-based groups also spent heavily in the race. The American Chemistry Council, whose members include many blue chip companies, spent more than $300,000 on TV ads promoting Cantor in the group's only independent expenditure so far this election year. Political arms of the American College of Radiology, the National Rifle Association and the National Association of Realtors also spent money on ads to promote Cantor.

Brat offset the cash disadvantage with endorsements from conservative activists like radio host Laura Ingraham and with help from local tea party activists angry at Cantor.

In the fall, Brat will face Democrat Jack Trammel, also a professor at Randolph-Macon, in the solidly Republican district.

DemonGeminiX
06-11-2014, 10:18 PM
So what's the word on the local homefront? What really happened?

Muddy
06-11-2014, 10:25 PM
Lonnng story short.. Because everyone KNEW Cantor had it in the bag... It was a very small turnout.. Something like 7,000 people in total voted.. Cantor has always kinda come across as a little arrogant and self serving (even though he is a nice guy, I met him recently) With the group of Cantor grumblers around here that wanted to send a message to Cantor that he needed to wake up because he can be replaced crowd, and the DEMOCRATS voting in the primary (open primary, any registerd voter living in the precinct can vote) for ANYBODY but Cantor (they loathe him) They had enough votes to send him packing. The big goal the Dems had here is knocking out the big boy so a weaker candidate (Dave Brat) can be defeated by their guy (Trammel, democrat) in the bigger election which sends a man (democrat) to D.C.. The vote wasn't necessarily about Dave Brat being a better candidate.. It was about (democrats) strategic placing to make them stronger in the long run.

DemonGeminiX
06-11-2014, 10:43 PM
If your county is anything like mine, as long as the candidate has an (R) beside his name in the general election, then he's in like Flynn. According to the pundits, your district is heavily Republican-leaning, so even with the weaker candidate Brat, the Republicans should have no problem winning. Is that a fair assessment?

Loser
06-11-2014, 10:46 PM
ermm...

brat had 36,110 voted to cantors 28,898.

The top democrat in the state maxed at 17,780.

I don't know where you're getting only 7,000 people voted.

Muddy
06-11-2014, 10:59 PM
If your county is anything like mine, as long as the candidate has an (R) beside his name in the general election, then he's in like Flynn. According to the pundits, your district is heavily Republican-leaning, so even with the weaker candidate Brat, the Republicans should have no problem winning. Is that a fair assessment?

Our county has a dividing line.. East and West.. It's any bodies game at this point.. BUT! the one thing the republicans have for them is Dave Brat is now an overnight star, so his name recognition s off the charts.. The really funny thing though? Dave Brat is a professor at Randolph-Macon university.. And so is his up coming Democratic competition.. :mrgreen:

http://www.timesdispatch.com/news/latest-news/randolph-macon-students-express-shock-excitement-for-professors-in-congressional/article_67c37a9a-f19d-11e3-9c8b-0017a43b2370.html

Muddy
06-11-2014, 11:03 PM
ermm...

brat had 36,110 voted to cantors 28,898.

The top democrat in the state maxed at 17,780.

I don't know where you're getting only 7,000 people voted.

My numbers are from memory, and obviously a little off. Point is they are still small turnout numbers.

1st District, U.S. House of Representatives
100% OF PRECINCTS REPORTING
Robert J. "Rob" Wittman (R / Inc.) 13,293 76%
Anthony T. Riedel (R) 4,151 24%

7th District, U.S. House of Representatives
100% OF PRECINCTS REPORTING
David A. Brat (R) 36,110 56%
Eric I. Cantor (R / Inc.) 28,898 44%

City of Richmond, Clerk of Court
100% OF PRECINCTS REPORTING
Edward F. Jewett (D / Inc.) 2,937 65%
Melvin Lorenzo Todd, Jr. (D) 1,180 26%
Scott O. Bailey (D) 389 9%

Loser
06-11-2014, 11:28 PM
From what I'm hearing from family. Cantor wanted to pass some lax ass imigration laws and people were a tad pissed.

Muddy
06-11-2014, 11:32 PM
From what I'm hearing from family. Cantor wanted to pass some lax ass imigration laws and people were a tad pissed.

He was starting to budge too much when dealing with the Dems.. Immigration was another big thing.. Dave brat is not into it...

Muddy
06-11-2014, 11:33 PM
There were many facets to Cantors downfall..

KevinD
06-12-2014, 01:24 AM
Listened to Cantors speech today, as well as some interviews with Brat. My take, Brat is a fairly straight Republican, pretty much along the actual party lines (that's a good thing imho) Cantors problem is what he's been doing since he was elected.
Brat, wasn't really a Tea Party nomination, though the MSN is making him out to be. He freely admits that. From the bit I've heard Brat talk about, I think he'd be a good thing. That said, likealwasy, it's not what they say to get elected, but what they do once so elected that matters.

Lambchop
06-12-2014, 01:32 AM
All news threads should start with an ass shot. That was some good shit sir

RBP
06-12-2014, 01:47 AM
I saw a few lefties trying to float the notion the tea partiers are all right right wing Christians who went after the Jew. :facepalm:

FBD
06-12-2014, 11:38 AM
like was mentioned, the problem with Cantor was what he did after getting into office.

at least this new guy has an economics degree, so hopefully that translates to not making asinine decisions that have .02% funding and uncle sam takes care of the rest of the bill.