PDA

View Full Version : US considers options as militants push closer to Baghdad



Teh One Who Knocks
06-13-2014, 10:36 AM
FOX News


http://i.imgur.com/DtPV72f.jpg

Al Qaeda-inspired militants pushed into a province northeast of Baghdad Friday, capturing two towns there after having already toppled cities in the country’s north, as the Obama administration considered possible responses to the crisis.

Police officials said militants driving in machinegun-mounted pickups entered two towns in Diyala province late Thursday -- Jalula, 80 miles northeast of Baghdad, and Sadiyah, 60 miles north of the Iraqi capital.

Iraqi soldiers abandoned their posts there without any resistance, the officials told The Associated Press.

The fresh gains by the fighters from the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIS) come as Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's Shiite-led government struggles to form a coherent response after the Sunni militants blitzed and captured the country's second-largest city of Mosul as well as other, smaller communities and military and police bases.

The new offensive by the militant group is the biggest threat to Iraq's stability since the U.S. withdrawal at the end of 2011, and it has pushed the nation closer to a precipice that would partition it into Sunni, Shiite and Kurdish zones.

Trumpeting their victory, the militants declared they would impose Shariah law in Mosul, Iraq's second-largest city they captured on Tuesday, and other areas they seized, and promised to march on Baghdad, joined by Saddam Hussein-era loyalists and other disaffected Sunnis.

In northern Iraq, Kurdish security forces have moved to fill the power vacuum caused by the retreating Iraqi forces -- taking over an air base and other posts abandoned by the military in the ethnically mixed city of Kirkuk.

The Obama administration is still trying to determine how to assist the Nouri al-Maliki government, while making clear it does not want U.S. troops in the middle of the fight.

"We are not contemplating ground troops," White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said Thursday.

President Obama promised Thursday to send more military aid, without saying what kind of new assistance would be given to Baghdad. Two U.S. officials who are familiar with ongoing negotiations told The Associated Press the White House is considering air strikes and increased surveillance, requested this week by the Iraqi defense minister, as the insurgency nears Baghdad.

According to the White House, Vice President Biden spoke Thursday with Maliki and expressed "solidarity" with the Iraqi government in its fight against the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria.

Meanwhile, a senior U.S. official confirmed to Fox News that Americans were being evacuated from a base in Balad, which had been one of the largest training missions in Iraq.

The three planeloads of Americans are mostly contractors and civilians, and were still in the process of being evacuated Friday, the Associated Press reported. The State Department said Thursday that the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad is operating as usual.

The development signals the worsening security environment in the northern part of the country. One senior official told Fox News that the focus for evacuation at this point is on people outside of Baghdad.

Two senior intelligence sources, though, told Fox News there is serious concern about how to evacuate other Americans out of Iraq if the situation further deteriorates.

"We need places to land, we need safe and secure airfields," one source said, noting that the militants are "seizing airfields and they have surface-to-air missiles, which very clearly threatens our pilots and planes if we do go into evacuation mode."

Sources said "all western diplomats in Iraq are in trouble," and American allies are scrambling to put together an evacuation plan. Military officials said there are "not a lot of good options."

Maliki had asked parliament to declare a state of emergency that would give him and his Shiite-led government increased powers to run the country, but the lawmakers failed to assemble a quorum on Thursday.

Skirmishes continued in several areas. Two communities near Tikirt -- the key oil refining center of Beiji and the city of Samarra, home to a prominent Shiite shrine -- remained in government hands, according to Iraqi intelligence officials.

In Saddam's hometown of Tikrit, overrun by the militants on Wednesday, witnesses said fighters raised posters of the late dictator and Izzat Ibrahim al-Douri, his former deputy who escaped the 2003 U.S.-led invasion and eluded security forces ever since.

Fighters loyal to his Naqshabandi Army as well as former members of Saddam's Baath Party were the main militant force in Tikrit on Thursday, said a resident who identified himself by his nickname, Abu Mohammed, out of concern for his safety. He said about 300 soldiers surrendered near the governor's office.

Lawmaker Hakim al-Zamili as well as two senior intelligence officials, who were not authorized to talk to the media, confirmed the involvement of al-Douri's group and other former Baathists and Saddam-era military commanders.

That could escalate the militants' campaign to establish an Al Qaeda-like enclave into a wider Sunni uprising and lead to breaking up the country along ethnic and sectarian lines.

With its large Shiite population, Baghdad would be a far harder target for the militants. So far, they have stuck to the Sunni heartland and former Sunni insurgent strongholds where people are already alienated by al-Maliki's government over allegations of discrimination and mistreatment. The militants also would likely meet far stronger resistance, not only from government forces but by Shiite militias.

Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr and the Asaib Ahl al-Haq Shiite militia vowed to defend Shiite holy sites, raising the specter of street clashes and sectarian killings.

Baghdad authorities tightened security and residents stocked up on essentials. Hundreds of young men crowded in front of the main army recruiting center in Baghdad after authorities urged Iraqis to help battle the insurgents.

Security officials said the Islamic State fighters managed to take control of two weapons depots holding 400,000 items, including AK-47 rifles, rockets and rocket-propelled grenades, artillery shells and mortars.

The U.N. Security Council met on the crisis, underscoring the growing international alarm over the stunning advances by the Islamic State.

The Iraqi government has been asking for more than a year for surveillance and armed drones to combat a Sunni insurgency that has gained strength from battlefield successes in neighboring Syria.

Republican lawmakers were harshly critical Thursday of the Obama administration's response. Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., called for Obama to replace his national security team.

House Speaker John Boehner snapped: "What's the president doing? Taking a nap."

Obama commented on the violence shortly afterward.

"What we've seen over the last couple of days indicates the degree to which Iraq is going to need more help," Obama said. "It's going to need more help from us, and it's going to need more help from the international community."

Several thousand Americans remain in Iraq, mostly contractors who work at the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad on programs to train Iraqi forces on American military equipment like fighter jets and tanks. Those being evacuated from Balad included 12 U.S. government officials and military personnel who have been training Iraqi forces to use fighter jets and surveillance drones.

Other U.S. contractors are at a tank training ground in the city of Taji, just north of the capital, that is still in operation for now.

In addition to the possible military assistance, State Department spokeswoman Psaki said the U.S. is sending about $12 million in humanitarian aid to help nearly a million Iraqis who have been forced from their homes by recent fighting in the nation's north and west.

RBP
06-13-2014, 11:43 AM
You keep mulling over your options, Mr. President. Thankfully this isn't a time for decisive action. [/sarcasm]

RBP
06-13-2014, 11:45 AM
Bush and Obama have mostly made things worse.

The lightning-fast march of a violent al-Qaeda splinter group through the heart of Iraq is not just one new slice of bad news from the Middle East. It is a defining moment that exposes more than a decade of failed U.S. policy and leaves the Obama administration with deeply disquieting choices.

The administration cannot simply stand aside while the jihadists attain their goal of establishing radical Islamist rule. The threat posed by the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) is too direct to ignore. Its tactics are so extreme that al-Qaeda disowned it, and its leaders are openly hostile to America. Letting such a group gain a permanent foothold would destabilize the region and repeat the history that led to 9/11.

But neither can the U.S. easily crush ISIS by plunging back into a re-invigorated Iraqi civil war.

The most telling aspect of the ISIS success was what it said about President Nouri al-Maliki, who has stubbornly resisted U.S. pressure to bring Iraq's Sunni minority into his government.

ISIS captured Mosul, Iraq's second-biggest city and a Sunni stronghold, with just a few hundred men. The militants then raced though Sunni-dominated areas toward Baghdad with minimal opposition. Army units surrendered or fled. Local opposition was non-existent.

Had Maliki not spurned the American advice, that would not have been possible. Instead, he so thoroughly alienated Sunni leaders — who had been pacified by U.S. troops — that they apparently were eager to see him deposed, even at the cost of alliance with the radical ISIS.

Where the crisis will lead is anyone's guess. On Thursday, Maliki and Shiite leaders were trying to mount a counteroffensive, but it wasn't clear that his government would survive. Iraq's parliament could not even convene a quorum to address Maliki's request for emergency powers.

What's not in doubt is the stakes, which reach beyond Iraq.

Saudi Arabia, Iran and Turkey — all bordering countries — are threatened in different ways by instability in Iraq. They'll be carefully watching the U.S. response. So too will Afghanistan's Taliban, who are eager to take control again as U.S. troops depart.

Nor is Europe disinterested. ISIS has recruited and trained a number of Westerners who could be deployed as terrorists.

If there's any good news, it is that ISIS has so many enemies. But whether the U.S. can exploit the weakness is less certain.

Two presidents — one a hawkish Republican and the other a dovish Democrat — have mostly made things worse.

Before George W. Bush's 2003 invasion, there was no terrorist presence in Iraq. By needlessly invading on false premises and in vain hope of installing a democracy, the U.S. destabilized the country and inspired a generation of enemies — at great cost in blood and treasure.

Obama inherited that mess, and by failing to bring Maliki into line deepened the problem. Now, with Obama's position further weakened by his equivocal response to atrocities in Syria, he's left with a bigger mess to clean up, one that demands fresh thinking about policies of war and peace that have failed so badly.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2014/06/12/iraq-us-obama-bush-malaki-editorials-debates/10408671/

RBP
06-13-2014, 11:47 AM
At this point, it's the only way to roll back the insurgents.

The United States has an intense interest in preventing Iraq from descending into all-out chaos amid the recent gains by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) militants.

Not only would anarchy in Iraq affect volatile world oil prices, but ISIS itself has also made clear that it ultimately aspires to world domination.

ISIS is a magnet for foreign fighters who might return to their homelands to conduct attacks. This makes the prospect of its establishing and maintaining a foothold in Iraq a severe security threat.

The Obama administration has been shipping arms to the besieged Iraqi government. But an approach solely focused on supplying weapons to the Iraqi security forces would not only be unlikely to succeed but also would probably aggravate the situation, given how easily ISIS has seized American military equipment during its offensives inside Iraq and Syria.

Indeed, Iraq's army has proved itself to be deficient in urban warfare and dealing with the guerrilla tactics of ISIS. Aerial targeting has also proved sorely inaccurate.

Security force abuses that were kept in check during the later years of the U.S. presence have returned since the U.S. withdrawal. These practices aid the insurgency by hindering prospects of cooperation with Sunni Arab locals.

Most notably, since the end of 2011, the security forces have engaged in mass arrests, often rounding up more innocents than suspects. The forces are increasingly relying on Iranian-backed Shiite militias, fostering the perception of the central government as a sectarian client of Iran.

At this point, the only way to roll back ISIS is to redeploy U.S. troops to Iraq on the ground. This would help the security forces reform their bad practices. It would also reignite and coordinate a Sunni tribal movement that inflicted substantial setbacks on ISIS' forebears in the 2007-09 period.

The presence of ground troops would allow the U.S. to exercise leverage in Iraq in pressuring the central government to integrate ordinary Sunni Arabs into political and economic life in Iraq. Without such reforms, the prospects for peace in Iraq are remote.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2014/06/12/iraq-us-troops-aymenn-jawad-al-tamimi-editorials-debates/10408483/

FBD
06-13-2014, 12:22 PM
I think we should send in the boards of every single federal reserve bank, straight into town. they'll get this mess straightened out :lol:

perrhaps
06-13-2014, 12:41 PM
I think we should send the homeys from Chiraq to Iraq! No matter what happens, we win!

perrhaps
06-13-2014, 05:44 PM
BREAKING NEWS!

The Obama administration is blaming the Iraq insurgency on an incendiary video.

PorkChopSandwiches
06-13-2014, 05:47 PM
:obama:

Goofy
06-13-2014, 06:19 PM
I think we should go back in time and never invade Iraq in the first place - was none of our fucking business anyway :) Really wish we'd sort out the problems in our own countries before we go off invading others........ this isn't the middle ages.

PorkChopSandwiches
06-13-2014, 06:20 PM
:dingdingdingding:

Goofy
06-13-2014, 06:26 PM
Did i win? :woot:

FBD
06-13-2014, 06:48 PM
I think we should go back in time and never invade Iraq in the first place - was none of our fucking business anyway :) Really wish we'd sort out the problems in our own countries before we go off invading others........ this isn't the middle ages.

Racketeers who operate the friggin racket dont like it when one of the fleeced doesnt do as he's told.

So in their eyes, of course its our goddamed business, we run the racket, you play the game we set up and we wont declare you a brutal murderous regime, and come brutally murder you.

perrhaps
06-13-2014, 07:15 PM
Did i win? :woot:

Winner, winner - chicken dinner at a Popeyes in Chicago, any time after 10:00 p.m.

Goofy
06-13-2014, 07:35 PM
Winner, winner - chicken dinner at a Popeyes in Chicago, any time after 10:00 p.m.

Awww, :rip: me

Hal-9000
06-13-2014, 07:40 PM
I think we should go back in time and never invade Iraq in the first place - was none of our fucking business anyway :) Really wish we'd sort out the problems in our own countries before we go off invading others........ this isn't the middle ages.

Sure it is, war = resources = $

they just use the veiled excuse that we're helping the poor folk under _____ regime and will liberate them :tup:

Hal-9000
06-13-2014, 07:40 PM
I think we should send the homeys from Chiraq to Iraq! No matter what happens, we win!


:lol:

RBP
06-14-2014, 03:03 PM
U.S. won’t intervene in Iraq in absence of political reform by Iraqis, Obama says

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_east/kerry-says-us-will-act-soon-on-iraq-but-at-request-of-baghdad-government/2014/06/13/53ddc5f0-f2f9-11e3-9ebc-2ee6f81ed217_story.html


"I hope Iran can fix it." (said nobody ever)

DemonGeminiX
06-14-2014, 03:35 PM
This man is stupid beyond any words that can be used to illustrate it.

FBD
06-14-2014, 04:54 PM
TPTB won’t intervene in Iraq, need to let these guys get more powerful so WWIII looks at least remotely plausible, Obama says[/url]


ftfy