PDA

View Full Version : UCI denies covering up Lance Armstrong doping test



Teh One Who Knocks
05-23-2011, 06:57 PM
By GRAHAM DUNBAR, AP Sports Writer


GENEVA (AP)—The International Cycling Union “categorically rejects” Tyler Hamilton’s allegations that it helped cover up a positive drug test by Lance Armstrong at the 2001 Tour de Suisse.

The UCI insisted Monday that it had “never altered or hidden the results of a positive test,” and that seven-time Tour de France winner Armstrong had never been notified of a positive finding.

“The UCI is deeply shocked by the seriousness of the allegations made on the ’60 Minutes’ program aired by U.S. television network CBS,” the body said in a statement. “The allegations of Mr. Tyler Hamilton are completely unfounded.”

Hamilton said in an interview which aired Sunday that his former teammate Armstrong used the blood-boosting hormone EPO to prepare for his third Tour win in 2001.

Armstrong told him the UCI helped cover up a positive test at the Swiss warm-up event, Hamilton alleged.

“The UCI can only express its indignation at this latest attempt to damage the image of cycling by a cyclist who has not hesitated to abuse the trust of all followers of cycling on several occasions in the past,” the statement said.

Hamilton, who admitted to “60 Minutes” that he doped during his career, twice tested positive for banned substances.

“At no time did he see fit to inform the UCI of the events he claims to have witnessed 10 years ago, and which he is now using in his attempt to harm the UCI,” the cycling body said.

“The UCI can only confirm that Lance Armstrong has never been notified of a positive test result by any anti-doping laboratory. … Once again, the UCI wishes to state that no manipulation or cover-up has occurred in respect of its anti-doping procedures.”

The UCI said it reserves the right to take legal action against Hamilton.

CBS’ “60 Minutes” also reported that UCI officials helped arrange a meeting involving Armstrong and the World Anti-Doping Agency-accredited laboratory at Lausanne, which tested the Swiss race samples.

The UCI and its former president Hein Verbruggen, whose 14-year spell in office ended in 2005, denied such a meeting took place.

Verbruggen told The Associated Press that Armstrong’s doping controls had never been hidden.

“There has never, ever been a cover-up. Not in the Tour de Suisse, not in the Tour de France,” the Dutch official said in a telephone interview. “I don’t know anything about suspicious tests. I was not aware of that.”

The UCI has previously said the 2001 Swiss race was clear of doping and denied suggestions that Armstrong gave it money for covering up a failed test.

Armstrong donated $25,000 in 2002 for the Swiss-based organization’s anti-doping program and $100,000 in 2005 for the purchase of a Sysmex machine used for analyzing blood.

Tour de Suisse spokesman Rolf Huser told the AP that organizers knew nothing about the race test results, which are conducted by cycling federations and anti-doping agencies.

“We are never in the loop about doping controls. We have to be neutral,” Huser said. “We can’t say anything about these rumors from 2001. We had the (race) results and everything was OK.”

The Tour de Suisse allegations are similar to those made by Floyd Landis, who had his 2006 Tour de France title stripped for doping. After years of denying he cheated, Landis came out last year acknowledging he used PEDs and alleged Armstrong did, as well.

Verbruggen and his successor as UCI president, Pat McQuaid, are suing Landis in a Swiss court for saying that the governing body protected star riders from doping allegations.

“There’s no reason that I should continue to prove my innocence—let people prove that we are guilty,” Verbruggen said Monday.

Teh One Who Knocks
05-23-2011, 06:58 PM
Why do people hate Armstrong so much? :-k

Is the guy a total dick in person or something? :confused:

AntZ
05-23-2011, 07:28 PM
Why do people hate Armstrong so much? :-k

Is the guy a total dick in person or something? :confused:

No! But he did make allot of arrogant cycling Euro-trash look real bad! :tup:

Goofy
05-23-2011, 08:34 PM
Why do people hate Armstrong so much? :-k

Is the guy a total dick in person or something? :confused:

I think it's called Jealousy :) No-one in cycling will ever come close to beating Lance (considering what he's been through)

Godfather
05-25-2011, 06:59 AM
I've read he's the most drug tested man in the world... it's hilarious how much the French hate him for making their race look easy :lol: They'd give their own left nut's to have him test positive.

Maybe Lance thinks Lance is pretty great, but he's earned the right to be a tad arrogant. He's the man. :thumbsup:

Arkady Renko
05-25-2011, 10:02 AM
Why do people hate Armstrong so much? :-k

Is the guy a total dick in person or something? :confused:

He is pretty arrogant for sure, that doesn't exactly help with his public image abraod. But other than that it's probably just an irrational aspect of nationalism. People in germany still like to believe that Jan Ullrich merely had that dodgy spanish doctor do some blood analysis for him and that the positive test for amphetamines was the result of his taking recreational drugs. People in France like to believe that all "their" riders are clean while everyone else "takes something", same goes for the spaniards and Contador.

So even though people should hate guys like Ulrich and Contador just as much they take it out on Armstrong because he was the most successful among all the cheats.