PDA

View Full Version : EU Countries Ignore New Law on Internet Privacy



Teh One Who Knocks
05-25-2011, 04:05 PM
By Jennifer Baker, IDG News


New European Union rules to ensure privacy have been ignored by the vast majority of E.U. member countries, according to Jonathan Todd, European Commission spokesman for Digital Agenda.

Only Denmark, Estonia and the U.K. have so far notified measures to implement the revisions to the ePrivacy Directive, Todd said on Wednesday.

The new law, which aims to give Internet users more information about the data stored about them, was supposed to be implemented by all E.U. countries by May 25. However it is not clear whether even the three countries that have taken measures are fully compliant with the law, leading to speculation that better protection of personal data online for customers is far from a priority.

Member states have had two years to implement the revised rules against tracking cookies. Under the new law, before being asked for their consent, users must be given information on the use of the collected data. The so-called "Cookies Directive" requires companies to obtain "explicit consent" from Web users before storing cookies.

Cookies are small pieces of software that are installed on the user's computer to remember log-in details and other preferences relating to a particular website. But they can be used to target advertising based on browsing history. The only exception to the cookie rule is when they are necessary for a service requested by the user, for example, when a user clicks "add to basket" button to buy goods from a website.

The slow implementation of this directive highlights the difficulty of framing legislation to protect consumer privacy. What "consent" to cookies requires in practice is not defined in detail in the directive, and some counties are hoping that, in principle, a browser set to "accept cookies" implies consent.

However, even U.K. Information Commissioner Christopher Graham acknowledges that his office's guidelines are "a work in progress." But he warned that browser settings alone may not be enough for compliance with the directive.

"The circumstances in which such settings can be considered appropriate for expressing the user's consent depends on how well they meet the general requirements in the legislation," said European Digital Agenda Commissioner Neelie Kroes.

The European Commission, the E.U.'s executive body, will consider opening infringement procedures against the 24 member states that have failed to transpose the directive into national law, said Todd.

FBD
05-25-2011, 04:50 PM
christ, when is the EU going to die?

Arkady Renko
05-26-2011, 11:23 AM
By Jennifer Baker, IDG News


New European Union rules to ensure privacy have been ignored by the vast majority of E.U. member countries, according to Jonathan Todd, European Commission spokesman for Digital Agenda.

Only Denmark, Estonia and the U.K. have so far notified measures to implement the revisions to the ePrivacy Directive, Todd said on Wednesday.

The new law, which aims to give Internet users more information about the data stored about them, was supposed to be implemented by all E.U. countries by May 25. However it is not clear whether even the three countries that have taken measures are fully compliant with the law, leading to speculation that better protection of personal data online for customers is far from a priority.

Member states have had two years to implement the revised rules against tracking cookies. Under the new law, before being asked for their consent, users must be given information on the use of the collected data. The so-called "Cookies Directive" requires companies to obtain "explicit consent" from Web users before storing cookies.

Cookies are small pieces of software that are installed on the user's computer to remember log-in details and other preferences relating to a particular website. But they can be used to target advertising based on browsing history. The only exception to the cookie rule is when they are necessary for a service requested by the user, for example, when a user clicks "add to basket" button to buy goods from a website.

The slow implementation of this directive highlights the difficulty of framing legislation to protect consumer privacy. What "consent" to cookies requires in practice is not defined in detail in the directive, and some counties are hoping that, in principle, a browser set to "accept cookies" implies consent.

However, even U.K. Information Commissioner Christopher Graham acknowledges that his office's guidelines are "a work in progress." But he warned that browser settings alone may not be enough for compliance with the directive.

"The circumstances in which such settings can be considered appropriate for expressing the user's consent depends on how well they meet the general requirements in the legislation," said European Digital Agenda Commissioner Neelie Kroes.

The European Commission, the E.U.'s executive body, will consider opening infringement procedures against the 24 member states that have failed to transpose the directive into national law, said Todd.

It's a tricky business, many times when the EU has worked out a new directive, the member states act as if that was some weird law from outer space even though their representatives agreed to it before. Usually it's a cheap populistic blame game when measures deemed necessary risk being unpopular at home. The national governments agree to a directive or regulation first and complain about the same thing once it gets into the public eye at home.

In this particular case it's the IT industry who try to stall the national implementation laws because they have gotten so used to having their way with user privacy that they don't want to accept any limitations however reasonable...


christ, when is the EU going to die?

WTF? Did you even read the original article?

Deepsepia
05-26-2011, 02:35 PM
I can see how this would be a troublesome directive to implement-- its actually asking the governments to write regs that govern data handling in a browser.

That's more than a little thorny . . . it "sounds simple", but for example -- does it cover caches? Distinguishing a "tracking cookie" from a cache ain't so easy . . . and browsers are evolving very fast. With the explosion of mobile applications, for example, more and more folks are browsing for location based data-- every mobile phone implicitly has a "tracking cookie" when you think about it.