PDA

View Full Version : Mathematician: No one understands my solution to complex math problem



Teh One Who Knocks
01-20-2015, 12:08 PM
By John Johnson - Newser


A Japanese mathematician swears he's solved one of the biggest problems in the world of math. The problem is, nobody, not even fellow mathematicians of the highest caliber, can understand Shinichi Mochizuki's proof of something called the ABC conjecture, reports New Scientist.

It doesn't help that the proof itself is 500 pages long or that Mochizuki developed his own set of mathematical principles called the Inter-Universal Teichmuller Theory that must be mastered first.

(Those who don't are "simply not qualified" to weigh in, says Mochizuki.) Mathematicians aren't saying that Mochizuki's resolution of the theory is wrong, but they're not saying it's right, either.

As a result, it's been in a kind of math limbo since 2012, despite attempts by the Kyoto University professor as recently as last month to shed light on it.

As for the ABC conjecture, it's a longstanding math problem that also happens to be "deceptively complicated," explains ZME Science. "It roughly states that three numbers a, b, and c, which have no common factor and satisfy a + b = c cannot be too smooth. ... In number theory, a smooth number is an integer which factors completely into small prime numbers." Got that? The upshot, according to both sites, is that the theory raises fundamental questions about the "nature of numbers," and thus its proof would be a major milestone.

"It's a bit disappointing that no one has come out and said it's right or wrong," says Oxford professor Minhyong Kim. (Elsewhere, a beating seems to have turned this man into a math whiz.)

FBD
01-20-2015, 03:06 PM
that's pretty fkn cool, but I am going to have to read it another 10 times.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abc_conjecture

PorkChopSandwiches
01-20-2015, 04:23 PM
DGX can prove it or not

DemonGeminiX
01-20-2015, 06:46 PM
No one can prove it, yet. I don't know what this guy has, but if they're not saying he's right and they're not saying he's wrong, then they're obviously looking his solution over. If he created a whole new system of branch of mathematics and it holds up to scrutiny, I'd like to see it. But these things take time to go through and verify.

PorkChopSandwiches
01-20-2015, 06:58 PM
Just prove it, so we can move on

DemonGeminiX
01-20-2015, 06:59 PM
:lol:

Yeah, I'm sure this is really gonna keep you awake at night.

PorkChopSandwiches
01-20-2015, 07:02 PM
I have been back to this thread 3 times looking for answers

DemonGeminiX
01-20-2015, 07:03 PM
The answer's 7.

Goofy
01-20-2015, 07:05 PM
Boring :yawn: Where's the boobs?

PorkChopSandwiches
01-20-2015, 07:06 PM
The answer's 7.

Thank christ, was that so hard

DemonGeminiX
01-20-2015, 07:09 PM
:lol:

FBD
01-20-2015, 07:22 PM
i t seems to set a lower bound on a resonant mode

Teh One Who Knocks
01-20-2015, 07:25 PM
The answer's 7.

:hand:

42