PDA

View Full Version : Biden Kicks Off White House Summit on 'Countering Violent Extremism' Tuesday



RBP
02-18-2015, 01:08 AM
Strategy is to "prevent violent extremism."



The Obama adminstration begins its three-day summit on countering violent extremism with a "roundtable discussion" Tuesday afternoon led by Vice President Joe Biden and including "representatives from cities working to address the spread of violent extremism." President Barack Obama will join the summit twice this week, according to the Associated Press:

President Barack Obama is scheduled to address a gathering at the White House on Wednesday that will examine how U.S. cities are dealing with these issues.

Obama will also deliver remarks Thursday at the State Department, where representatives of some 60 countries are scheduled to meet. The White House did not release the complete list of participating countries, though representatives from the United Kingdom, Jordan, the United Arab Emirates and Kuwait are expected to attend, one of the officials said.

Representatives from the private sector, nongovernmental organizations and social media companies also are scheduled to participate in the summit.

What sort of progress can Americans expect from this summit? According to a senior official who previewed the summit with reporters, the Obama administration views countering violent exteremism (what they label CVE) as "one incredibly important element" of the government's counterterrorism and national security strategy.

"[O]ur CVE efforts are premised on the central goal of preventing violent extremism and the extremists themselves and their supporters from inspiring, radicalizing, financing or recruiting individuals or groups in the United States from committing acts of violence," said the official. "Our approach empowers communities to push back against violent extremists."

What does that mean, exactly? The official continued: "Really at the core of our approach is that the government does not have all the answers in combatting violent extremism. It is, at its core, a bottom-up approach. It puts communities with civic leaders, with religious authorities, with community power brokers, teachers, health providers, et cetera, in the driver’s seat. They know their citizens best. They are the first line of defense to prevent or counter radicalizing forces that can ultimately lead to violence. And so our approach is to really embrace and empower what local communities can do."

This appears to be in sync with what State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf told MSNBC's Chris Matthews Monday evening in response to the cable host's questions about the lack of a strategy in the fight against the Islamic State terrorist group. "But we cannot win this war by killing them. We cannot kill our way out of this war. We need in the medium and longer term to go after the root causes that leads people to join these groups."

======================================

Jordan: We will kill them until we run out of bullets and fuel.
Egypt: Avenging Egyptian blood and punishing criminals and murderers is our right and duty.
USA: Maybe if they just talked to them.

:facepalm:

Hal-9000
02-18-2015, 04:04 AM
We need in the medium and longer term to go after the root causes that leads people to join these groups.

I will never condone terrorist actions. I do know part of this answer however. When a US drone strike kills a number of people on their soil, there will be collateral damage because of the nature of the weapon. As with any foreign country run by a fuckwit regime, the terrorists are only furnished with one source of information...whatever their superiors choose to show to them.

So no matter how righteous any US drone strike, police action, or retaliation may be...the conditioning is already so ingrained within the terrorist mind, that there will be no chance of discourse or enlightenment...even when using facts, evidence and civility.


It's sad but bullies only understand one thing...a bigger bat.

RBP
02-18-2015, 04:07 AM
Oh believe me, I see little difference between collateral damage of a drone strike and a beheading.

In a war zone may be a different discussion.

Teh One Who Knocks
02-18-2015, 11:34 AM
Did you see the newest 'plan' put forth by the Administration? Give them jobs, the lack of employment is what is making these young people become extremists. :|

Teh One Who Knocks
02-18-2015, 11:36 AM
I will never condone terrorist actions. I do know part of this answer however. When a US drone strike kills a number of people on their soil, there will be collateral damage because of the nature of the weapon. As with any foreign country run by a fuckwit regime, the terrorists are only furnished with one source of information...whatever their superiors choose to show to them.

So no matter how righteous any US drone strike, police action, or retaliation may be...the conditioning is already so ingrained within the terrorist mind, that there will be no chance of discourse or enlightenment...even when using facts, evidence and civility.


It's sad but bullies only understand one thing...a bigger bat.


Oh believe me, I see little difference between collateral damage of a drone strike and a beheading.

In a war zone may be a different discussion.

"One: You accept that you are in a war. Two: You name the enemy, Islamist terrorists. Three: You get the lawyers off the battlefield […] you accept there will be collateral damage and you do not apologize for it. You do not nation build, you don’t try to hold ground. You go wherever in the world the terrorists are and you kill them, you do your best to exterminate them, and then you leave, and you leave behind smoking ruins and crying widows. If in five or 10 years, they reconstitute and you gotta go back, you go back and do the same thing, and you never, never, never send American troops into a war you don’t mean to win"

~Lt. Col. Ralph Peters (retired)

RBP
02-18-2015, 04:13 PM
Did you see the newest 'plan' put forth by the Administration? Give them jobs, the lack of employment is what is making these young people become extremists. :|
:facepalm:

Teh One Who Knocks
02-18-2015, 04:16 PM
FOX News


http://i.imgur.com/DD0sYhU.jpg

What the West really needs to take on the Islamic State is ... a jobs program.

That's what a top State Department spokeswoman suggested when asked in a TV interview Monday night about what the U.S.-led coalition is doing to stop the slaughter of civilians by Islamic State militants across the region.

"We're killing a lot of them, and we're going to keep killing more of them. ... But we cannot win this war by killing them," department spokeswoman Marie Harf said on MSNBC's "Hardball." "We need ... to go after the root causes that leads people to join these groups, whether it's lack of opportunity for jobs, whether --"

At that point, Harf was interrupted by host Chris Matthews, who pointed out, "There's always going to be poor people. There's always going to be poor Muslims."

Harf continued to argue that the U.S. should work with other countries to "help improve their governance" and "help them build their economies so they can have job opportunities for these people."

She acknowledged there's "no easy solution" and said the U.S. would still take out ISIS leaders. But Harf said: "If we can help countries work at the root causes of this -- what makes these 17-year-old kids pick up an AK-47 instead of trying to start a business?"

Asked about Harf's remarks on Tuesday, State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said Harf was only making the point that fighting ISIS entails more than just a military solution.

The comments come as the Obama administration takes heat from lawmakers for its approach to the Islamic State, whose self-proclaimed fighters in Libya recently executed 21 Coptic Christians from Egypt.

The White House on Tuesday kicked off a three-day summit on "countering violent extremism." It began with Vice President Biden moderating a discussion on countering extremism with representatives from cities.

This, though, follows a pattern of conferences and summits called by the administration to address urgent challenges. The administration is facing criticism for this approach -- and for describing the summit in general terms -- at a time when Islamic State militants are spreading, recruiting and executing prisoners from multiple countries in increasingly brutal ways.

"The White House had to seem like it was doing something," said Jonah Goldberg, a National Review editor and conservative columnist, while claiming the summit won't achieve much.

Senior administration officials, though, defended the conference, and their description of it, on a call with reporters.

Asked whether Islamic extremists are in fact the focus of the summit, one official said extremism has spanned "many decades" and taken on "many forms," but they recognize that those launching recent attacks "are calling themselves Muslims."

"You can call them what you want. We're calling them terrorists," the official said.

The New York Times reported Tuesday that as airstrikes continue in Iraq and Syria, the administration is boosting efforts to counter ISIS on social media. The plan centers around a small State Department agency that pushes against ISIS and other groups' online propaganda.

"We're getting beaten on volume, so the only way to compete is by aggregating, curating and amplifying existing content," Richard Stengel, under secretary of state for public diplomacy and public affairs, told the Times.

Officials reportedly plan to describe some of their social media strategy at the three-day counter-extremism summit.

RBP
02-18-2015, 04:17 PM
Take every soldier and contractor jailed or currently under indictment for war related crimes and commute their sentences if they go attack ISIS. If they survive a year they are free.

Hal-9000
02-18-2015, 05:49 PM
yeah...open a Muslim Starbucks and hire all those young terrorists



:doh: caffeine ...

FBD
02-18-2015, 06:19 PM
Get rid of the CIA and mossad, kill all the zionist bankers, then we'll have world peace.