PDA

View Full Version : Rep: Blake Lively Nude Pics Are Fake



Teh One Who Knocks
06-01-2011, 11:26 AM
Us Weekly


http://i.imgur.com/3yeLr.jpg

Blake Lively is threatening to sue any publication which reprints fake photos that claim to be the actress, 23, in the nude.

The shots were distributed across various websites on Tuesday evening.

In the pictures, a blonde woman is seen taking snaps of herself without any clothes on. But Lively's rep tells Us Weekly they are a complete hoax.

"The photos of Blake Lively which have just surfaced on various websites including Perez Hilton and Zap2it are 100 percent fake," her rep says.

"Blake has never taken nude photos of herself. Blake will pursue legal action against the publication which initially published these photographs and any other outlets that republish them in any manner."

Lively's next film The Green Lantern hits cinemas on June 17.

Teh One Who Knocks
06-01-2011, 12:11 PM
Here are the pix in question.....they are NSFW, so you have been warned:

http://s1d3.turboimagehost.com/t1/7530993_blakeNSFW_BD001.jpg (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/7530993/blakeNSFW_BD001.jpg.html) http://s1d3.turboimagehost.com/t1/7530994_blakeNSFW_BD002.jpg (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/7530994/blakeNSFW_BD002.jpg.html) http://s1d3.turboimagehost.com/t1/7530995_blakeNSFW_BD003.jpg (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/7530995/blakeNSFW_BD003.jpg.html) http://s1d3.turboimagehost.com/t1/7530997_blakeNSFW_BD004.jpg (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/7530997/blakeNSFW_BD004.jpg.html) http://s1d3.turboimagehost.com/t1/7530998_blakeNSFW_BD005.jpg (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/7530998/blakeNSFW_BD005.jpg.html)

PorkChopSandwiches
06-01-2011, 02:55 PM
If the are not real then what basis does she have to sue

Teh One Who Knocks
06-01-2011, 03:01 PM
Defamation I guess? :-k

Hal-9000
06-01-2011, 03:04 PM
I heard she was interviewed and said it was a 'rookie mistake' (including her face in the pics)

Other experts are saying, yes indeed they are Blake

Hal-9000
06-01-2011, 03:05 PM
looks like her eyes to me and possibly body type....I think her boobs are bigger tho.


*returns to examine pictures*

fricnjay
06-01-2011, 03:05 PM
They dont look photoshopped...On top of that it does really look like her plus that is a really nice clean bathroom, something you would expect her to be in. It has marble counter tops, nice tile on the floor and slate around the tub. Looks like a pretty high dollar bathroom. Not like the usually self pics in a cheap middle class bathroom with clothes and crap all over the place. My money is on they are real.

Teh One Who Knocks
06-01-2011, 03:11 PM
I dunno....it looks like it could be her, but then again it looks just a little off. So I dunno :-k

Teh One Who Knocks
06-01-2011, 03:13 PM
They dont look photoshopped...On top of that it does really look like her plus that is a really nice clean bathroom, something you would expect her to be in. It has marble counter tops, nice tile on the floor and slate around the tub. Looks like a pretty high dollar bathroom. Not like the usually self pics in a cheap middle class bathroom with clothes and crap all over the place. My money is on they are real.

The bathroom to me (from what we can see) looks like a very high dollar hotel. My biggest reason for thinking that are the white towels. Who really uses white towels besides hotels? Especially looking at how they are hung.

fricnjay
06-01-2011, 03:17 PM
The bathroom to me (from what we can see) looks like a very high dollar hotel. My biggest reason for thinking that are the white towels. Who really uses white towels besides hotels? Especially looking at how they are hung.

I agree, which makes me think it could be her. :-k

Muddy
06-01-2011, 03:26 PM
*spurrrrt*

Hal-9000
06-01-2011, 03:28 PM
I'm with Lance...something about the girl looks a little different.

I think Blake should provide some real nipple pics so we can compare :thumbsup:

Godfather
06-01-2011, 03:36 PM
Oh man... I'm just going to call them real and live with that :thumbsup: Awesome

Hal-9000
06-01-2011, 03:38 PM
Oh man... I'm just going to call them real and live with that :thumbsup: Awesome

wanking does not care about real




:thumbsup:

Softdreamer
06-01-2011, 03:40 PM
Saying they are fake is her idea of quashing the story, but ironically, her denying it led me to find said pictures in the first place..

But, saying that, I have no idea who she is. But gratefully accept said pictures, fake or real, for my collection :)

Hal-9000
06-01-2011, 03:48 PM
I think....if it was me...
If someone floated pics saying they were me and the model in them had a worse or different body, I would take issue.

Other than the obvious "I'm not a whore factor" the ladies go through when this happens :lol:

PapaZ
06-01-2011, 03:50 PM
The eyes don't look quite right... Blake squints and the nude girl's eyes are open wide... but the placement of the moles on her face look spot on (no pun intended) so I'm calling them real. :tup:

Hal-9000
06-01-2011, 03:52 PM
the last one looks the most real to me...she has that long body type

Teh One Who Knocks
06-01-2011, 04:14 PM
The biggest issue I have is probably the one with the full face shot...how come it's so super blurry? That looks like an iPhone she's using and I'm assuming its camera is at least as good as mine in my smart phone. I have taken photos with my phone while I was driving and they came out perfectly clear, so why would a stationary photo be so bad?

DemonGeminiX
06-01-2011, 04:26 PM
I think they're real. Of course she's gonna look different. She's not all dolled up like she is on the red carpet. Would she have her makeup artist do work on her right before she takes nude self-pics on her phone? Would she have a professional photographer camp out in her bathroom?

Softdreamer
06-01-2011, 04:28 PM
The biggest issue I have is probably the one with the full face shot...how come it's so super blurry? That looks like an iPhone she's using and I'm assuming its camera is at least as good as mine in my smart phone. I have taken photos with my phone while I was driving and they came out perfectly clear, so why would a stationary photo be so bad?

I recommend you do plenty of research into the blurry aspect of 'teh self shot'
Here is some good reading
http://tehbasement.com/showthread.php?1842-Softdreamer-s-Selfshooting-Gallery

I have studied in this field for many years, and came to the conclusion that girls hands shake from excitement at the sight of their own boobage, my right hand goes up and down uncontrollably upon viewing these type of images.

Teh One Who Knocks
06-01-2011, 04:29 PM
I recommend you do plenty of research into the blurry aspect of 'teh self shot'
Here is some good reading
http://tehbasement.com/showthread.php?1842-Softdreamer-s-Selfshooting-Gallery

I have studied in this field for many years, and came to the conclusion that girls hands shake from excitement at the sight of their own boobage, my right hand goes up and down uncontrollably upon viewing these type of images.

Dude, I'm driving 40 mph down the highway and snapped some pix out of the window while I was driving and the pix are clear as day. I don't buy it, especially with a high end smart phone.

DemonGeminiX
06-01-2011, 04:31 PM
The biggest issue I have is probably the one with the full face shot...how come it's so super blurry? That looks like an iPhone she's using and I'm assuming its camera is at least as good as mine in my smart phone. I have taken photos with my phone while I was driving and they came out perfectly clear, so why would a stationary photo be so bad?

How do you know the phone was stationary? She could've been waving her arm before she snapped the photo. It's not all that blurry to me. Dim lighting and motion. Was it taken in a mirror that was slightly fogged up?

Funny you say your pictures always turn out great... mine always suck really hard... even when I'm standing still. Guess I just take bad pictures and like to deflect the blame.

:lol:

Softdreamer
06-01-2011, 04:33 PM
Check back through that thread, notice the difference in quality from smart phone, dedicated camera, and Crapple..


If those pics are not her.. we need to find who she is and get more pics pronto

Teh One Who Knocks
06-01-2011, 04:37 PM
How do you know the phone was stationary? She could've been waving her arm before she snapped the photo. It's not all that blurry to me. Dim lighting and motion. Was it taken in a mirror that was slightly fogged up?

Funny you say your pictures always turn out great... mine always suck really hard... even when I'm standing still. Guess I just take bad pictures and like to deflect the blame.

:lol:

Dude, like I said in the post just above yours....here is my proof:


Trade ya

http://i.imgur.com/Vo55ul.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/rdSR0l.jpg

I took those photos one-handed, while driving, out through the windshield of my truck with a camera in my phone.

DemonGeminiX
06-01-2011, 05:05 PM
:-s

Do you use an iPhone?

Teh One Who Knocks
06-01-2011, 05:10 PM
:-s

Do you use an iPhone?

:slap:

But since anything made by Apple is supposed to be superior in any and all ways compared to anything else out there, her photos should look like they came out of a photography studio ;)

DemonGeminiX
06-01-2011, 05:14 PM
Well apparently they're not superior. Either that, or she has an older model with a crappy camera.

:slap:

Hal-9000
06-01-2011, 05:30 PM
almost every self pic I've seen has sucked to some degree...maybe that's changed recently

Teh One Who Knocks
06-01-2011, 05:57 PM
almost every self pic I've seen has sucked to some degree...maybe that's changed recently

Wanna see some of mine? :shifty:

Hal-9000
06-01-2011, 06:13 PM
Wanna see some of mine? :shifty:

No.


You + nudity + lingerie = stomach upset and severe corneal problems

deebakes
06-01-2011, 11:11 PM
:wank:

PapaZ
06-01-2011, 11:30 PM
A guy on TMZ just said he got an email... "Click On The Nude Blake Lively Pics"... he did and his comp "blew up" with a virus! :lol:

deebakes
06-01-2011, 11:32 PM
poor bastard... should have gotten a mac :tup:

deebakes
06-01-2011, 11:44 PM
i'd like to see her muff :oops:

Godfather
06-02-2011, 01:19 AM
A guy on TMZ just said he got an email... "Click On The Nude Blake Lively Pics"... he did and his comp "blew up" with a virus! :lol:

..........A guy working at a source for celeb insiders was fuggin' stupid enough to get hit by that and didn't have adequate AV protection?!?!?!

Wow. Just... wow. That's like wondering around Mozambique and nailing prostitutes two at a time without a condom

deebakes
06-02-2011, 02:07 AM
That's like wondering around Mozambique and nailing prostitutes two at a time without a condom

and the problem with that is? :-k

AntZ
06-15-2011, 09:50 PM
Blake Lively’s Alleged Nude Photos Still All Over Web Despite Rep's Threats of Legal Action

By Hollie McKay

Published June 15, 2011 | FoxNews.com



Two weeks ago, Blake Lively became the latest star embroiled in a nude photo scandal, as hackers released an array of nude pictures the said were self-shot candids of the “Gossip Girl” star.

Lively's reps were quick to cry foul, claiming the pictures were not Lively, and publicly threatening legal action against any outlet who published the pictures and implied that they were her.

“The photos of Blake Lively which have just surfaced on various Web sites ... are 100 percent fake,” Lively’s rep said in a statement. “Blake will pursue legal action against the publication which initially published these photographs and any other outlets that republish them in any manner.”

But so far, only one site we contacted said they had been approached by Lively's legal team, and the snapshots remain published on numerous websites.

Perez Hilton indicated that he removed the first set of photos per an attorney's request, but a second set of photos – released by the purported hackers after Lively’s rep sent the threatening statement – still remain on the gossip blogger’s over-18 site.

Gawker.com told Pop Tarts they have had no pressure put on them to have the pictures taken down.

“We haven't heard from Lively or her representatives since publishing the photos. Nor have we haven't received any requests by Lively or anyone else to take them down,” said Remy Stern, editor-in-chief of Gawker.com.

Jim McBride, aka "Mr. Skin," posted the pictures on his website's blog, where they remain, and hopes this is just the beginning.

"At first sight, I thought the pics were real. Then I had my Skin Lab technicians confirm it by comparing moles and body shaping and such," McBride said. "I just hope that this is our skintroduction to many more Blake Lively nudes to come."

Barstool Sports, another site hosting the hyped pictures, also told us they hadn't heard from Lively's people since posting the pics.

A rep for Lively did not respond to our latest request for comment.

California defense attorney David Wohl said that if Lively doesn’t pursue legal action, then chances are the body-baring pics will stay.

"If she doesn't sue at all, the pictures will stay put on the various websites, unless, that is, the owners of those sites develop a conscience and agree to requests to remove them," Wohl told FOX411's Pop Tarts. "Believe it or not sometimes that works, but Blake shouldn't hold her breath."

Interestlingly, the “Gossip Girl” can sue irrespective of whether the snaps are her or not.

"If they are Blake, than she can sue for invasion of privacy, negligent infliction of emotional distress and misappropriation of her image for monetary gain," Wohl continued. "If they are not her, you can add libel to that lawsuit, along with the rest of the causes of action. In either case, she would seek an injunction demanding removal of the pics and preventing further publication."

Despite the controversy, the 23-year-old actress – who has also hit headlines lately with her new romance with Oscar-nominated actor Leonardo DiCaprio – hasn’t shied away from plugging her upcoming superhero flick, “The Green Lantern.”

“It was such a great honor to step into a film about a comic that has been around and been beloved by so many generations of fans. To step into this film was exciting but daunting, you have a lot of people that you want to make proud,” Lively told FOXNews.com. “You don’t want these characters fans love being destroyed by us… we want to do it justice.”

And at least when it comes to her on-screen ventures, the young star isn’t afraid to take risks and be a bad girl.

“I would be thrilled to get to do more stunts and to get to be a villain," Lively said. "That would be a lot of fun."

Softdreamer
06-15-2011, 10:29 PM
My first point still stands.. If that isnt her body, we need to find out who's it is.


After all, I have more chance of fucking somebody that ISNT famous anyways

deebakes
06-15-2011, 11:14 PM
it's her :tup:

Muddy
06-16-2011, 12:07 AM
Ohhhh, I get it now Dee... :lol:

Deepsepia
06-16-2011, 12:14 AM
Looking at the pics, the girl in the photo appears to have a distinctive mole on her breastbone. Given that the picture's a bit shaky, it might be something else, but that's what it looks like to me. I looked at some other pics of Blake, and didn't see it, but its the sort of thing easily covered by makeup . . . still if anyone has any "candid" beach photos, you might compare

http://picload.org/image/ladawl/firefoxscreensna.jpg

deebakes
06-16-2011, 12:16 AM
Ohhhh, I get it now Dee... :lol:

:dance: :cheerlead:


had to keep running with the ruse :lol:

Godfather
06-16-2011, 07:02 AM
Looking at the pics, the girl in the photo appears to have a distinctive mole on her breastbone. Given that the picture's a bit shaky, it might be something else, but that's what it looks like to me. I looked at some other pics of Blake, and didn't see it, but its the sort of thing easily covered by makeup . . . still if anyone has any "candid" beach photos, you might compare

http://picload.org/image/ladawl/firefoxscreensna.jpg

Just looked like a necklace to me in the original photo :-k

Hal-9000
06-16-2011, 04:07 PM
A guy on TMZ just said he got an email... "Click On The Nude Blake Lively Pics"... he did and his comp "blew up" with a virus! :lol:

"hit self in nutz with hammer"

duuurh ok :face:

PapaZ
06-16-2011, 07:20 PM
Got the email, to, eh? :lol:

deebakes
06-17-2011, 01:29 AM
:wank: :wank: