PDA

View Full Version : Teacher, 34, avoid jail after admitting sex with 14-year-old when he wrote his number on the board for female classmates to call him ...and she phoned instead



Teh One Who Knocks
05-15-2015, 11:01 AM
By Wills Robinson For Dailymail.com


http://i.imgur.com/BJN0ndx.png

A former science teacher has admitted having sex with a 14-year-old student after contacting him using a number he had written on the board to attract female classmates.

Mother-of-two Irene Khan from West Melbourne, Florida, avoided jail after pleading guilty to having the year-long relationship with the youngster, three years after she was arrested.

The 34-year-old began texting and calling the boy from Imagine Charter School so they could meet in a local motel room using the number he had initially intended to catch the eyes of girls in his class.

For the next few months the pair would hook up in her car and apartment.

Police later discovered information and questioned the boy before Khan was detained.

Before the scandal broke, according to WESH Orlando, she had been fired from the school for inappropriate behavior - including showing off her tattoos to students.

The ex-teacher, who was charged with lewd and lascivious battery, entered her guilty plea Wednesday.

Khan was sentenced to two years of community control followed by 10 years of probation.

She must register as a sex offender and was also forbidden from having any contact with children besides her own.

The judge said that during that time she is not allowed to wear a Santa outfit or wear any costume that may appeal to children.

If she violates the conditions - she could be jailed for 30 years.

RBP
05-15-2015, 11:08 AM
A year of sexual assaults on a child and pleased down to lewd and lascivious battery with no jail time.

Awesome. :|

Teh One Who Knocks
05-15-2015, 11:16 AM
Honest question here...why does the kid in any of these stories, especially the ones in long-term ongoing relationships, deserve no blame/responsibility whatsoever? In many states, kids as young as 10, 11, and 12 can be tried as adults for pre-meditated 1st degree murder, but when it comes to something like this, the kid is always without blame? The kid in the OP did not have to hook up with the teacher. He could have reported it as soon as she made first contact and made it obvious what she was after. But no, instead the kid went along with it and had an ongoing sexual relationship with the teacher.

What's the difference? Pre-meditated murder is a much more heinous crime than havinbg sex with an adult as an underage kid (IMHO). Why is it that a kid is deemed to know the difference between right and wrong when it comes to murder, but they have zero culpability in any of these situation?

RBP
05-15-2015, 11:20 AM
He can't legally consent, so that's considered blaming the victim.

deebakes
05-16-2015, 03:35 AM
:?

PorkChopSandwiches
05-16-2015, 03:29 PM
He was obviously asking for it. :rapeculture: