PDA

View Full Version : Canada to announce plan to resettle 25,000 Syrian refugees



Teh One Who Knocks
11-24-2015, 11:52 AM
The Associated Press


http://i.imgur.com/6CyZSvN.jpg

TORONTO – Prime Minister Justin Trudeau will announce Tuesday his plan to resettle 25,000 Syrian refugees and he says all 10 of Canada's provincial premiers support bringing that many in.

Trudeau hasn't backed down from a pledge to bring 25,000 Syrian refugees to Canada by Dec. 31 despite pushback by some following the deadly attacks in Paris.

Details of how the refugees will be brought over and where they will be housed are expected to be announced Tuesday.

"Everyone agrees that Canada must do more and must welcome 25,000 refugees," Trudeau said after meeting with provincial leaders late Monday.

Tuesday's announcement is sure to raise alarm in the U.S. where many Republican governors have said they don't want any Syrian refugees.

Trudeau said robust security screening continues to be a high priority.

Quebec Premier Phillipe Couillard said accepting refugees and immigrants is part of Canadian tradition.

"There was no one sitting at the table that is not interested in seeing refugees come," Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne said.

Immigration Minister John McCallum said he spoke to Canada's big city mayors about how they can help resettle the refugees.

Canada has long prided itself on opening its doors wider than any nation to asylum seekers. In times of crisis in decades past, Canada resettled refugees quickly and in large numbers. It airlifted more than 5,000 people from Kosovo in the late 1990s, more than 5,000 from Uganda in 1972 and resettled 60,000 Vietnamese in 1979-80. More than 1.2 million refugees have arrived in Canada since World War II.

Former Conservative Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper, who lost the Oct. 19 election to Trudeau, had declined to resettle more Syrian refugees, despite the image of a drowned 3-year-old boy washed up on a Turkish beach focusing global attention on the refugee crisis stemming from the civil war. The boy had relatives in Canada and the refugee crisis became a major campaign issue.

Brad Wall, the Conservative premier of Saskatchewan province, said he has problems with the deadline of Dec. 31 for security reasons, but believes Canada should welcome the refugees.

More than 4 million Syrians have fled their country since the conflict began in 2011.

Muddy
11-24-2015, 01:58 PM
Now we gotta worry about these mother fuckers jumping the border..

Jezter
11-24-2015, 04:07 PM
Good luck, Canada! :tup:

Hal-9000
11-24-2015, 06:09 PM
:facepalm:

Hugh_Janus
11-24-2015, 06:10 PM
enjoy your new neighbours, halal :tup:

Hal-9000
11-24-2015, 06:12 PM
halal


fuck off :lol:

Teh One Who Knocks
11-24-2015, 06:14 PM
"Everyone agrees that Canada must do more and must welcome 25,000 refugees," Trudeau said

You must welcome them Halal :x

Goofy
11-24-2015, 06:16 PM
enjoy your new neighbours, halal :tup:


halal


fuck off :lol:

:rofl:

Hal-9000
11-24-2015, 06:19 PM
You must welcome them Halal :x


:rofl:

:x somehow, someday...Imma get Hugh you bastard!!!!



http://i.imgur.com/1NLvEuC.jpg

Hugh_Janus
11-24-2015, 06:23 PM
http://i65.tinypic.com/2ib2qhi.jpg

Hal-9000
11-24-2015, 06:25 PM
!!!!! لديك قضيب صغير كنت الأغنام مقيت

:x

Hugh_Janus
11-24-2015, 06:27 PM
google translated to "I have a small penis you sheep distasteful"

Goofy
11-24-2015, 06:27 PM
google translated to "I have a small penis you sheep distasteful"

Hahahahaha :rofl:

Hugh_Janus
11-24-2015, 06:28 PM
http://i63.tinypic.com/4sxk7a.jpg

Hal-9000
11-24-2015, 06:30 PM
google translated to "I have a small penis you sheep distasteful"


:lol: not the target statement but close..

deebakes
11-25-2015, 03:22 AM
:rofl: so much greatness in here :bwaha:

Godfather
11-25-2015, 03:32 AM
I'm not totally unsympathetic to these people, but bringing in 25,000 refugees is a drop in the bucket so what's the real point? Also, we're not taking any unaccompanied males (understandable for security reasons), but this is likely going to alienate and piss off more fighting age males over there and potentially turn them right to ISIS's welcome arms. Furthermore it's all happening too fast, and if these refugees are all housed in the same area, they'll never assimilate. It's all a mess.

I'd much rather see money and effort go towards a humanitarian effort in safe zones in the Middle East (maybe some wealthy Arab neighbors could help...) so when this is over, they can go home again. Bringing them here is a bad idea. We've seen what happens in Britain and Germany once you have huge Muslim populations: They want all the comforts of our democratic free society... under sharia law.

I like the Atlantic Ocean between us and them.

And we've already got our Police acting as babysitters for the mentally ill who have nowhere to go, and huge homeless populations in general. It's offensive to me that these rapid plans to help people from the other side of the world are being tossed together while there are kids living in poverty here.


Disjointed rant but I think I'm done for now.

RBP
11-25-2015, 04:14 AM
I'm not totally unsympathetic to these people, but bringing in 25,000 refugees is a drop in the bucket so what's the real point? Also, we're not taking any unaccompanied males (understandable for security reasons), but this is likely going to alienate and piss off more fighting age males over there and potentially turn them right to ISIS's welcome arms. Furthermore it's all happening too fast, and if these refugees are all housed in the same area, they'll never assimilate. It's all a mess.

I'd much rather see money and effort go towards a humanitarian effort in safe zones in the Middle East (maybe some wealthy Arab neighbors could help...) so when this is over, they can go home again. Bringing them here is a bad idea. We've seen what happens in Britain and Germany once you have huge Muslim populations: They want all the comforts of our democratic free society... under sharia law.

I like the Atlantic Ocean between us and them.

And we've already got our Police acting as babysitters for the mentally ill who have nowhere to go, and huge homeless populations in general. It's offensive to me that these rapid plans to help people from the other side of the world are being tossed together while there are kids living in poverty here.


Disjointed rant but I think I'm done for now.


That wasn't disjointed. How ironic that "no unaccompanied males" are allowed to leave sharia law.

Jezter
11-25-2015, 10:38 AM
I'm not totally unsympathetic to these people, but bringing in 25,000 refugees is a drop in the bucket so what's the real point? Also, we're not taking any unaccompanied males (understandable for security reasons), but this is likely going to alienate and piss off more fighting age males over there and potentially turn them right to ISIS's welcome arms. Furthermore it's all happening too fast, and if these refugees are all housed in the same area, they'll never assimilate. It's all a mess.

I'd much rather see money and effort go towards a humanitarian effort in safe zones in the Middle East (maybe some wealthy Arab neighbors could help...) so when this is over, they can go home again. Bringing them here is a bad idea. We've seen what happens in Britain and Germany once you have huge Muslim populations: They want all the comforts of our democratic free society... under sharia law.

I like the Atlantic Ocean between us and them.

And we've already got our Police acting as babysitters for the mentally ill who have nowhere to go, and huge homeless populations in general. It's offensive to me that these rapid plans to help people from the other side of the world are being tossed together while there are kids living in poverty here.


Disjointed rant but I think I'm done for now.

Pouring money in there would be all well and good if it actually went into the right hands and right places. But well all know it wont happen that way. I don't even know what the right answer to the whole deal is, but I know that relocating whole fucking nations across the world is not the right way to do it!