PDA

View Full Version : Police arrest man for sending inappropriate pictures to a minor



Teh One Who Knocks
03-02-2016, 12:28 PM
NBC26 Staff


http://i.imgur.com/uiUtZr9l.jpg?1

OSHKOSH, WI -- The Oshkosh Police Department arrested an 18-year-old Oshkosh man for causing a child to view sexual material and exposing genitals to minors.

Police say he sent a minor inappropriate pictures on Snapchat.

Investigators think there may be more victims related to this incident. They say the man had two Snapchat accounts: Maxwell 872 and Jmoney 371.

Police ask parents to talk with their kids about this incident or check their teen's Snapchat account to see if they were contacted by the 18-year-old man. They're also asking parents to get involved, and better understand the potential dangers behind these apps.

The concept behind Snapchat is simple.

Open the app on your mobile phone, take a picture, or video, lasting mere seconds, write something short, and send it to any friend on your list.

"It wouldn't be traced back to them," describes online security expert Curt Esser. "It'd be something quick, and fast."

It's the understanding that everything sent over Snapchat will be erased immediately after it's viewed that experts say appeals to so many teens.

"The idea is that you can send embarrassing, or risque, pictures without being afraid of someone hacking your online account," says Esser.

But Esser says there are ways to hold onto these images that are supposed to disappear.

"People can take a screenshot very easily," says Esser. "Now we're finding out that there's actually a hidden folder on the recipient's phone where these chats are stored."

Esser says parents should know if, and how, their kids are using the app.

But many parents say that's easier said than done.

"Well, I think it's new technology," says Meredith Scheuermann, who has three high school and college-aged children. "You know, many of us didn't grow up with that, so it's probably keeping up with the times as well."

If you believe your child was a victim in this crime you are asked to contact School Resource Officer David Maas at (920) 252-0233 or Detective Sgt. Joe Framke at (920) 236-5734.

RBP
03-02-2016, 12:41 PM
And were the girls sending nude snapchats to him also? I can't argue against charges for sending a minor pornography, but I also can't justify ignoring the girls producing and distributing child porn.

Pony
03-02-2016, 12:46 PM
I noticed they didn't state the age of the alledged victims, It could be an 18yo sending pics to 17yo girls.

deebakes
03-03-2016, 02:19 AM
sort of a stretch to say 18 years old is a man, could be a high school senior ffs :shrug:

RBP
03-03-2016, 03:12 AM
sort of a stretch to say 18 years old is a man, could be a high school senior ffs :shrug:

Well, but you could argue the 16 year old girl who's the HS blowjob queen is hardly a child, but you'll lose that argument.

deebakes
03-03-2016, 03:35 AM
she's innocent though :shrug:

Godfather
03-03-2016, 07:54 AM
I noticed they didn't state the age of the alledged victims, It could be an 18yo sending pics to 17yo girls.

Exactly. I know some places in Canada have age difference rules which I agree with.. if you're within a year or two in age, I see no reason your consensual relationship has to stop just become someone hits their 18th birthday. That should extend to sending each other private communications IMO (or at least it shouldn't be grounds for life-ruining sex offender charges).

Might not at all be the case here, could be something far worse... but I think it's still worth knowing the age of the victim(s)

RBP
03-03-2016, 11:13 AM
Exactly. I know some places in Canada have age difference rules which I agree with.. if you're within a year or two in age, I see no reason your consensual relationship has to stop just become someone hits their 18th birthday. That should extend to sending each other private communications IMO (or at least it shouldn't be grounds for life-ruining sex offender charges).

Might not at all be the case here, could be something far worse... but I think it's still worth knowing the age of the victim(s)

Although sexual consent is not the issue here. Transmission of pornography has different rules.