PDA

View Full Version : The long lines at airports are a problem for Hillary Clinton



RBP
05-27-2016, 01:06 PM
- Washington Post

Transportation Security Administration administrator Peter Neffenger says an increase in passenger numbers is one reason for long lines at airport security checkpoints. (Reuters)

The long security lines at U.S. airports are another problem for Hillary Clinton. A lot of Americans interact with the Transportation Security Administration, and they expect that agency to function properly. And when there is a problem, they want it fixed. Does anyone think of Clinton as a problem-solver? Answer: No. Can anyone think of a problem she has ever solved?

As I have written before, the Democrats are identified as a party that agitates for interest groups and social causes. They impose their will through regulations and via the courts. The Obama era has left the Democrats without any claim to managerial expertise or problem-solving skills, and Clinton will pay a price for that in November.

The current problems at the TSA are a perfect example. When Americans are standing in lines at our nation’s airports and fuming about incompetence in government, they don’t want to hear excuses about a lack of government resources. Who do you think is more likely to shake things up with the bureaucrats at the Department of Homeland Security and actually get the TSA working, President Hillary Clinton or President Donald Trump? It’s no contest.

If Trump were to show up at an American airport and face those waiting in a long security line, he would probably be welcomed and he would instantly be recognized as someone who would make changes. If Clinton were to show up, I think she would be greeted as an agent of the status quo, and the crowd reaction would be, to put it mildly, more subdued. Not one person who is outraged and disgusted while standing in a security line and missing their flight could care less about Trump’s taxes or how he may or may not have treated a girlfriend decades ago. They want somebody who can make basic government functions work. Let’s face it, the people who rolled out the Obamacare website are the same people who can’t figure out how to match the number of TSA security screeners with airport traffic.

Honestly, do you think the White House has spent more time in the past 90 days managing its school bathroom mandate for transgender students or trying figuring out how to make TSA security lines work with adequate efficiency this travel season? The answer is obvious.

Denial is rampant in this administration. Its approach to management is to deny problems exist and to shift focus to one left-wing cause or another. I have no doubt the TSA strategy will be to shift blame, whine about funding shortages and deny that things are as bad as they are. I suspect after a congressional probe, we will actually find that much of the TSA problems in the summer of 2016 were made worse by the Obama administration’s obsession with regulations, grievances and union rules that took precedence over efficiency, customer service and getting a job done.

Again, this is what our government has become under the Democrats: All lecturing and no management. This is what has fueled much of the Trump movement, and it is another reason Hillary Clinton is such a poor fit for the country in 2016. We don’t need a third Obama term. Remember that the next time you are stuck in a security line at an airport.

lost in melb.
05-27-2016, 01:23 PM
http://vignette3.wikia.nocookie.net/simpsons/images/e/e9/Nelson_Ha-Ha.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20121205194057



I'm travelling to the US in 3 weeks :)

lost in melb.
05-27-2016, 01:25 PM
seriously though, why are long lines at airports a government issue? :-k

FBD
05-27-2016, 02:20 PM
when you want to restrict people's movement stealthily, the first method is to make it uncomfortable and or inconvenient for them to travel

RBP
05-27-2016, 04:15 PM
seriously though, why are long lines at airports a government issue? :-k

Airport Security was nationalized after 9-11

FBD
05-27-2016, 04:23 PM
the federal government performed another unconstitutional measure that they had no right to do, and Airport Security was nationalized after 9-11

ftfy



http://www.memri.org/report/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/9202.htm

Hikari Kisugi
05-27-2016, 04:52 PM
Airport Security was nationalized after 9-11

Under your republican government iirc...

There are lines at every airport in the world, it used to be free for us to arrive into the US, now we've to pay for a visa waver, half that money pays for your extra security, the other half pays to advertise us to go to the US.
The TSA and its various representations always tend to make you look bad to the world, whether it be a poor implementation, or just a sign that you think you have to do security differently to the rest of the world to be and feel safe.

I am not convinced you do having flown to many many countries and seen many different types of security, your TSA wouldn't make me feel one bit safer, nor would your air marshals.

RBP
05-27-2016, 04:59 PM
I wasn't commenting, I was simply answering lost in Melb's question as to why it was a government issue in the first place.

FBD
05-27-2016, 05:01 PM
because things that happened in the 1930s still are applicable today

https://realnewsaustralia.com/2016/04/24/1973-the-birth-of-corporate-australia/