PDA

View Full Version : 15-time Playboy cover model Pamela Anderson urges people to stay away from porn



Teh One Who Knocks
09-07-2016, 11:04 AM
FOX 411


http://i.imgur.com/TloUsYb.jpg

Former Playmate Pamela Anderson is urging people to give up pornography once and for all in a Wall Street Journal op-ed this week. She argues with Rabbi Shmuley Boteach that porn has a “corrosive effect on a man’s soul and on his ability to function as husband, and, by extension, as father. This is a public hazard of unprecedented seriousness given how freely available, anonymously accessible and easily disseminated pornography is nowadays.”

Anderson labels porn as something for “losers.”

“Simply put, we must educate ourselves and our children to understand that porn is for losers— a boring, wasteful and dead-end outlet for people too lazy to reap the ample rewards of healthy sexuality,” the duo wrote.

The op-ed also used the Anthony Weiner scandal and his wife’s recent announcement that she is separating from him to further demonstrate the dangers of porn.

“If anyone still had doubts about the addictive dangers of pornography, Anthony Weiner should have put paid to them with his repeated, self-sabotaging sexting,” they wrote. “What is required is an honest dialogue about what we are witnessing—the true nature and danger of porn—and an honor code to tamp it down in the collective interests of our well-being as individuals, as families and as communities.”

The 49-year-old has had two sex tapes leaked—one with Tommy Lee in 1995 (her husband at the time) and another one with Bret Michaels in which images of the video appeared in Penthouse magazine in 1998. Anderson has also appeared on more Playboycovers (15) than any other model, and was the last model to pose nude for the magazine in its the January/February 2016 issue.

deebakes
09-07-2016, 12:33 PM
:hand:

"i'm old and can't get work, what can i do to make myself relevant again?"

- Pam Anderson 2016

fricnjay
09-07-2016, 01:26 PM
:potkettle:

PorkChopSandwiches
09-07-2016, 03:56 PM
Porn is the devil

DemonGeminiX
09-07-2016, 04:04 PM
:nono:

Foosball's the devil.

Godfather
09-08-2016, 03:54 AM
She's just bitter about the Hep still

redred
09-08-2016, 06:14 AM
:hitit: still would just to claim a bit of history

fricnjay
09-08-2016, 01:31 PM
:hitit: still would just to get Hep C

:ftfy:

redred
09-08-2016, 01:58 PM
double bag myself , i'll be ok :tup:

http://news.health.com/2015/11/12/pamela-anderson-hepatitis-c-cure/ claims she hasn't got it anymore

Godfather
09-10-2016, 02:03 AM
She probably doesn't, most cases are curable now which is a pretty underrated medical advancement of the past few years.

RBP
09-10-2016, 03:12 AM
Well, she's not wrong.

Teh One Who Knocks
10-24-2016, 10:53 AM
The New York Post


http://i.imgur.com/bYzRgoA.jpg

Pamela Anderson wants to change the way you have sex.

The former Playboy model is looking to start a “sensual revolution” among couples in hopes of improving sex lives.

“There is so much access to porn, people are becoming desensitized … in the multiple visual images that get weirder and stranger. It’s a big concern,” Anderson, 49, told “This Morning” on Friday.

She continued, “I talk to a lot of mothers and I know I’m part of the problem. I should probably disqualify myself from the whole situation because I was in Playboy and I had a tape stolen from my home and exploited all over the world. And people saw things they should have never seen.”

Anderson is referring to her infamous 1995 sex tape with ex-husband Tommy Lee, with whom she shares two sons, Dylan, 18, and Brandon, 20.

The conversation soon led to Anderson revealing how she’s been treated in bed.

“Have you ever been treated like a porn star in bed? It’s no fun,” Anderson opened up. “Slapped, hit, called names, spit on. That’s sex these days.”

Anderson is asking people to step away from porn and reconnect with each other.

“We’re talking about the sensual revolution. Having intimacy and intimate relationship with so much better sex,” she added. “We’re not prudes. We’re not talking about no sex. We want better sex.”

“Everyone wants to be desired in a relationship. That’s the number one thing,” Anderson added. “Pornography and access to other things is diminishing that.”

“Girls and guys are being affected by this because young people are looking at this thinking, ‘This is how I have to act and behave in a sexual relationship.'”

RBP
10-24-2016, 10:58 AM
Slapped, hit, called names, spit on. That’s sex these days.

What porn is she watching? :lol:

No, really, what porn is she watching. 8-[

DemonGeminiX
10-24-2016, 11:34 AM
In a sense, she's right. Nothing's left to the imagination. People come to expect things to be a certain way based on what they've watched when what they've seen's just not reality. There is absolutely no connection in the act. Some people learned from porn that this is the way it's supposed to be, and it's a shame and a sin, because it should be so much more.

Now excuse me, I have to go watch some chick get tied up, ball-gagged, and fucked up the ass... because you know, all women love that.

RBP
10-24-2016, 12:25 PM
I buy the notion of porn creep... substituting porn for intimacy, where the need for more graphic porn creeps up until normal intimacy is difficult. That's been demonstrated.

But the idea that men watch porn (and by the way, this is FAR from a male-only issue) and say "Ohhhh... so that's what I am supposed to do to my girlfriend" is ridiculous.

RBP
10-24-2016, 12:29 PM
And didn't she re-release the Tommy Lee vids commercially with addition footage fairly recently? If I remember that right, she can't really call it stolen material any more.

DemonGeminiX
10-24-2016, 12:39 PM
For us? Sure, but we grew up in eras where we'd go out and socialize as normal routine and had parents involved in our lives. Now think about younger generations that stay inside all the time stuck to their computers and devices like glue, and have uninvolved parents (if there at all). There's serious potential for awkward development there, enough so that they might learn from what they see online as normal, especially if they're watching this stuff at a young age.

RBP
10-24-2016, 01:00 PM
For us? Sure, but we grew up in eras where we'd go out and socialize as normal routine and had parents involved in our lives. Now think about younger generations that stay inside all the time stuck to their computers and devices like glue, and have uninvolved parents (if there at all). There's serious potential for awkward development there, enough so that they might learn from what they see online as normal, especially if they're watching this stuff at a young age.

Fair enough. If you find anything other than speculation that demonstrates that to be true, I'd love to read it.