PDA

View Full Version : 'Monster' planet discovery stuns scientists



Teh One Who Knocks
11-01-2017, 10:49 AM
FOX News


https://i.imgur.com/twXwpC5.jpg

Astronomers have discovered a planet the size of Jupiter orbiting a star that’s only half the size of the sun — a celestial phenomenon that contradicts theories of planet formation.

NGTS-1b, a massive, 986-degrees-hot ball of gas revolving around a red M-dwarf star 600 light years from Earth, is the largest planet compared to the size of its star ever found.

The discovery contradicts theories that a star so small could form a planet so large. Scientists previously theorized that small stars could form rocky planets, but they did not gather enough material to form planets the size of Jupiter.

As red M-dwarf stars are the most common type in the universe, scientists now believe there may be many more planets like this.

NGTS-1b was spotted by an international collaboration of researchers using the Next-Generation Transit Survey (NGTS) facility in Chile, according to a report from the University of Warwick.

It is about 2.8 million miles away from its star — only 3 percent of the 93-million-mile distance between Earth and the sun. A year on NGTS-1b — the time it takes to revolve around its star — occurs every 2.6 Earth days.

"The discovery of NGTS-1b was a complete surprise to us. Such massive planets were not thought to exist around such small stars,” said the lead author of the research, Dr. Daniel Bayliss of the University of Warwick’s Astronomy and Astrophysics Group. “This is the first exoplanet we have found with our new NGTS facility, and we are already challenging the received wisdom of how planets form.”

“NGTS-1b was difficult to find, despite being a monster of a planet, because its parent star is small and faint,” said Warwick Professor Peter Wheatley. “Small stars are actually the most common in the universe, so it is possible that there are many of these giant planets waiting to found.

“Having worked for almost a decade to develop the NGTS telescope array, it is thrilling to see it picking out new and unexpected types of planets. I'm looking forward to seeing what other kinds of exciting new planets we can turn up.”

The astronomers’ report, ‘NGTS-1b: a hot Jupiter transiting an M-dwarf’, will be published in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

lost in melb.
11-01-2017, 11:11 AM
It is about 2.8 million miles away from its star — only 3 percent of the 93-million-mile distance between Earth and the sun.

That's very close. For reference this planet is only 8 times as far from its Sun as our Moon is from the Earth. What a spectacular sight.

It reminds me of a binary star formation (which is quite common) except that of course one of the stars is too small. You need at least 100 Jupiter masses in a lump to get nuclear fusion to ignite.

Hal-9000
11-01-2017, 04:15 PM
We discovered and lost Pluto before it's made even one revolution around the sun. I don't trust these astronomer guys and their fancy theories.

Hal-9000
11-01-2017, 04:26 PM
Nibiru :shock:

Teh One Who Knocks
11-01-2017, 04:28 PM
We discovered and lost Pluto before it's made even one revolution around the sun. I don't trust these astronomer guys and their fancy theories.

https://i.imgur.com/7eG2DaL.jpg

Hal-9000
11-01-2017, 04:35 PM
“Small stars are actually the most common in the universe..."

Ya no kidding Einstein, small 'cause they're all like 20 kabillion miles away :x

Muddy
11-01-2017, 04:35 PM
Niburu!!

deebakes
11-02-2017, 12:39 AM
we're all going to die :(

lost in melb.
11-02-2017, 01:51 AM
I sometimes feel like my intelligent discourse is unappreciated in this forum.

Oh, well. Back to Porky's Plumbing thread :wank:

deebakes
11-02-2017, 01:57 AM
:empathy:

there's also the safe space thread too melb :shrug:

PorkChopSandwiches
11-02-2017, 04:46 PM
:rofl:

Hal-9000
11-02-2017, 08:31 PM
I sometimes feel like my intelligent discourse is unappreciated in this forum.

Oh, well. Back to Porky's Plumbing thread :wank:

Hey! I made the flippant, yet astute comment about how astronomers interpret data from a distance and often disprove the original hypothesis within a relatively short period of time, so consequently it's often difficult to accept that a new theory has any merit or weight until it can be correlated.

and I'm lost...can you direct me to the sewage system thread pls :oops:

lost in melb.
11-03-2017, 04:37 AM
Hey! I made the flippant, yet astute comment about how astronomers interpret data from a distance and often disprove the original hypothesis within a relatively short period of time, so consequently it's often difficult to accept that a new theory has any merit or weight until it can be correlated.



That you did. Nice subtlety! Most people wouldn't realise that Pluto take a few hundred years to orbit ;)


and I'm lost...can you direct me to the sewage system thread pls :oops:

Follow your nose! :nana: [NSFW wtf section]

Hal-9000
11-03-2017, 07:51 PM
*beams with pride*

:)