PDA

View Full Version : North Korean defector describes forced abortion, said bodies fed to dogs in prison



Teh One Who Knocks
12-12-2017, 12:07 PM
By Ben Evansky | Fox News


https://i.imgur.com/i2dR6FL.jpg

United States Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley held a meeting on the human rights situation in North Korea where one defector spoke about how she was forced to have an abortion following her repatriation from China.

The woman, Ji Hyeon-A, describes a harrowing scene of prison dogs eating dead bodies at her prison camp. She pleaded for the world to act.

The event was titled “The Terrifying experience of forcibly Repatriated North Korean women,” and was sponsored by the U.S. France, Japan, South Korea, Canada and the U.K.

Ji Hyeon-A was repatriated three times to North Korea after she was caught in China. She finally escaped to South Korea and spoke of her horrifying experiences.

She described how North Korean women who got pregnant in China were forced to have abortions.

“Pregnant women were forced into harsh labor all day,” she said. “At night, we heard pregnant mothers screaming and babies died without ever being able to see their mothers.”

North Korea does not allow for mixed-race babies, she said. At one detention center, she described how inmates starved to death. Their dead bodies, she said, were given to the guard dogs for food.

The third time Ji Hyeon-A got caught and sent back to North Korea she was three months pregnant. She tearfully described how she was forced to have an abortion without medication at a local police station.

“My first child passed away without ever seeing the world,” she said, “without any time for me to apologize.”

She finally reached South Korea in 2007 and has since been reunited with her mother, brother and her younger sister. She still has not heard news of her father.

Ji-Hyeon-A said that the North Korean soldier who recently escaped to South Korea “represents a dash toward freedom which is a dream of 25 million North Koreans.”

She said North Korea was “a terrifying prison and the Kim’s are carrying out a vast massacre and it takes a miracle to survive there.”

She criticized the Chinese government for sending North Koreans back to the regime, and urged the Chinese government to stop repatriating people back to the Hermit Kingdom, saying they know what will happen to them when they get there.

Ji-Hyeon-A urged the U.N. and world leaders to fight for North Korean defectors and especially those who are repatriated.

She recited a poem called “Is anyone there?” from a collection of poems she wrote.

“I am scared, is anyone there? I’m here in hell, is anyone there? I scream and yell but no one opens the door. Is anyone there? Please listen to our moans and listen to our pain. Is anyone there? People are dying, my friend is dying. I call out again and again but why don’t you answer. Is anyone there?

Britain’s ambassador to the United Nations, Matthew Rycroft, praised Ji-Hyeon-A for speaking at the event, and said the crimes discussed, which included, “forced abortions, summary executions, hard labor, rape: those are conditions that amount to crimes against humanity,” he said.

Earlier in the day China had tried to stop a Security Council meeting convened by Japan on the human rights situation in North Korea. China only had the support of Russia and Bolivia and failed in its attempt to stop it from moving forward.

At the Security Council meeting, Haley said the full story of the North Korean people needed to be told.

“The regime is using that power to develop an unnecessary arsenal and support enormous conventional military forces that pose a grave risk to international peace and security,” she said. “Their menacing march towards nuclear weapons begins with the oppression and exploitation of ordinary North Korean people.”

Haley said the situation was made possible “through the export of workers abroad to earn hard currency and the use of forced labor at home, the regime uses its people to underwrite its nuclear and ballistic missile programs.”

She said the Kim regime has imprisoned an estimated 100,000 people.

“The North Korean regime's system of guilt-by-association,” she said, “allows for up to three generations of family members to be imprisoned along with the accused.”

PorkChopSandwiches
12-12-2017, 04:48 PM
best korea

deebakes
12-13-2017, 12:57 AM
:bs:

Hugh_Janus
12-14-2017, 08:41 PM
but did this actually happen?

#fakenews

Godfather
12-14-2017, 11:17 PM
but did this actually happen?

#fakenews

No, it's probably worse :|

lost in melb.
12-14-2017, 11:32 PM
Yep, plus the schoolgirls that disappear when they refuse to join Supreme Leader's Harem

Hal-9000
12-15-2017, 05:54 PM
"At one detention center, she described how inmates starved to death. Their dead bodies, she said, were given to the guard dogs for food."

If they have proof of this, why doesn't The Donald install democracy there?

Detention centers in 2017? :| Almost makes a person want the Kim fuckwits to try something...

Hikari Kisugi
12-15-2017, 06:15 PM
"At one detention center, she described how inmates starved to death. Their dead bodies, she said, were given to the guard dogs for food."

If they have proof of this, why doesn't The Donald install democracy there?

Detention centers in 2017? :| Almost makes a person want the Kim fuckwits to try something...

They are bankrupt, they have no resources, they have a shit load of piss poor military, and they worrying probably have messy stockpiles of very inaccurate bio and chemo stuff coupled with potential nukes.
Most would be intercepted, but the complete mess of wanting to take over 25 million refugees, in their own country and actually feed and rebuild the place is the main reason no one can be arsed.

Also Kim rumblings allow bigger budget on military and navy and every shouts how is it needed.

The last thing they want to do is remove all their enemies. Especially ones they could actually obliterate like Kim, unlike the religion of peace which they don't stand a hope of defeating.

Hal-9000
12-15-2017, 06:47 PM
They are bankrupt, they have no resources, they have a shit load of piss poor military, and they worrying probably have messy stockpiles of very inaccurate bio and chemo stuff coupled with potential nukes.
Most would be intercepted, but the complete mess of wanting to take over 25 million refugees, in their own country and actually feed and rebuild the place is the main reason no one can be arsed.

Also Kim rumblings allow bigger budget on military and navy and every shouts how is it needed.

The last thing they want to do is remove all their enemies. Especially ones they could actually obliterate like Kim, unlike the religion of peace which they don't stand a hope of defeating.

So do you think it's a case where if someone took out Kim, the same sort of government would replace him? Perhaps there's a new group that wouldn't mind backing from the UN (and US..) to change North Korea over the space of a few years? I'm sure the NK public is ready for something/anything to change and would welcome the help.

I understand what you're saying about the cost to replace the infrastructure of the entire country, but what happens if under a new rule they create jobs, maybe create items for export and stop this draconian treatment of their people?

All it would take is one bullet and one of those fancy rifles that can hit a target from 2 kms away...

Teh One Who Knocks
12-15-2017, 06:51 PM
Look at German reunification. Granted, East Germany wasn't in nearly as bad a shape as Best Korea is, but it was impoverished, run down, poor, and badly in need of an infrastructure upgrade. I think South Korea with the help of the west (US and Europe) could help reunify the country with (relatively) little pain.

The bigger stumbling block would be the Chinese because now suddenly, they have a free and democratic Korea right on their border.

Hikari Kisugi
12-15-2017, 06:54 PM
Nope, Kim is a figurehead for their establishment, rather like the US establishment, it rumbles on, no matter who is in charge, the little fuckers in the big hats, their families, their sons, and the rapey boys of the police, secret police, political police, would all need assassinated at one time.

Then south Korea and china and indeed Russia would need to super reinforce the border to stop the cits fleeing, until such times as a new regime could be installed to actually modernise the shit hole.

It has no resources, no money, they use human shit as fertilizer as they can't produce or make enough for their own failing crops (Kim rainbow policy), they can only just about export coal, that's banned currently but the nation which can't power and heat itself shouldn't be exporting anything.

If you engaged, executed a few thousand of the right people in a day, then you might have a chance, otherwise you'll get a shit hole tearing itself apart, with people trying to flee, and China shooting fleeing people at the border, as they simply wouldn't fucking want it to happen either.
It isn't Kim, its the whole sick lot of them. Every smiling fucking bastard in a hat.
Best chance is probably to nuke their national day parade, kill a million innocents to take out the high command, and even then you can't account for all the rapey centres around the country full of sick cunts who job it is to abuse and rape women.

Awful place.

Hal-9000
12-15-2017, 07:00 PM
Look at German reunification. Granted, East Germany wasn't in nearly as bad a shape as Best Korea is, but it was impoverished, run down, poor, and badly in need of an infrastructure upgrade. I think South Korea with the help of the west (US and Europe) could help reunify the country with (relatively) little pain.

The bigger stumbling block would be the Chinese because now suddenly, they have a free and democratic Korea right on their border.

That's what I was thinking. South Korea is doing okay (reportedly better internet service than Canada) and with the backing of the major players in the world, couldn't they change and eliminate that old regime forever? If people in NK have been living in worse conditions than we hear about, surely there's no footing for an old school political faction to take control back.

And regarding China, couldn't the US just park half of their navy down there and say - Come at me bro?

Hal-9000
12-15-2017, 07:06 PM
Nope, Kim is a figurehead for their establishment, rather like the US establishment, it rumbles on, no matter who is in charge, the little fuckers in the big hats, their families, their sons, and the rapey boys of the police, secret police, political police, would all need assassinated at one time.

Then south Korea and china and indeed Russia would need to super reinforce the border to stop the cits fleeing, until such times as a new regime could be installed to actually modernise the shit hole.

It has no resources, no money, they use human shit as fertilizer as they can't produce or make enough for their own failing crops (Kim rainbow policy), they can only just about export coal, that's banned currently but the nation which can't power and heat itself shouldn't be exporting anything.

If you engaged, executed a few thousand of the right people in a day, then you might have a chance, otherwise you'll get a shit hole tearing itself apart, with people trying to flee, and China shooting fleeing people at the border, as they simply wouldn't fucking want it to happen either.
It isn't Kim, its the whole sick lot of them. Every smiling fucking bastard in a hat.
Best chance is probably to nuke their national day parade, kill a million innocents to take out the high command, and even then you can't account for all the rapey centres around the country full of sick cunts who job it is to abuse and rape women.

Awful place.

How about if you make a few high profile assassinations and then pose the question to the armies that were formerly under the people in power? Do you want to be next?

And then open an Apple factory there. We've heard about the bad working conditions making those products in other Asian countries, but surely the people of NK wouldn't mind full time jobs? One resource they have is people, so why not use them?

Hikari Kisugi
12-15-2017, 07:14 PM
Okay Apple factory, grand, few issues, no infrastucture, country has few vehicles, country doesn't have enough power plants to provided it with electric, nor the food or resources to feed its people.
The place is less developed than most of Africa.

Unlike Germany, the place is utterly fucked.

I would love to see it happen, but the US doesn't want rid of their ghost nation. they can keep building aircraft carriers while such 'threats' exist.

High profile assassinations, say a few hundred, yeah, but nuking national day would still be cheaper and easier, and would cull the herd also, meaning less mouths to feed in the aftermath, just 'civilised' folks might frown upon such actions.

Hal-9000
12-15-2017, 07:19 PM
I guess because it sounds like the people have nothing already, that any type of change would be a step up.


"...nuking national day would still be cheaper and easier..." :lol: that's horrible