PDA

View Full Version : ‘Feminist Science’ event teaches researchers how to do ‘socially just science’



Teh One Who Knocks
01-29-2018, 12:40 PM
William Nardi, University of Massachusetts Boston - The College Fix


https://i.imgur.com/PugAgN7.jpg

Scientific inquiry has long been considered a stalwart of observation and objectivity, but one effort underway by some researchers prioritizes applying a “critical social justice lens into science,” according to an upcoming event at UC Santa Cruz.

The event, what organizers dubbed “Feminist Science,” describes the effort as a method that infuses social justice, inclusion and equality into science to advance progressive social change.

“Research Justice 101: Tools for Feminist Science” will be hosted at the Northern California school next week and teach researchers how to “practice a socially just science,” according to the event’s description on the university’s website. Researchers at UC Berkeley and other nearby schools have been invited to attend.

“Participants will be challenged to apply principles and practices of justice to their own work, interrogating questions such as: Who benefits? Who is harmed? Who is most vulnerable? … And ultimately, who do we do science for, and why? The workshop will conclude with practical skills and resources for participants to push their research communities to be more inclusive, equitable and attentive to social justice,” the event description states.

The workshop is hosted by Free Radicals, described as “a collective that envisions an open and responsible science that works toward progressive social change.”

The College Fix reached out to UC Santa Cruz officials to ask whether feminist science should trump the long-established scientific method, and whether the institution would support the implementation of such an agenda into its curriculum.

Scott Hernandez-Jason, a spokesman for the school, did not answer specific questions but instead referred The College Fix to the event’s hosts, a Los Angeles-based community organization called Free Radicals.

The mission of the Free Radicals is to enact political and social change by advocating scientists “think through the hidden assumptions in their methodological approaches and challenges researchers to think more deeply about the political implications of their work,” its website states.

The Free Radicals could not be reached on Tuesday by The College Fix to discuss how they would respond to those who may view their effort as a manipulation of science to advance an identity politics-driven agenda.

The event is sponsored by UC Santa Cruz’s Science and Justice Research Center, self-described as a “globally unique endeavor” that works to build on the school’s “historic commitments to socioecological justice and strengths in science studies and interdisciplinary research.”

The “feminist science” workshop will be led by Paloma Medina, a second year Ph.D. student in biomolecular engineering and bioinformatics at UC Santa Cruz who also helped initiate the Queer Ecologies Research Cluster, according to the event page.

The Queer Ecologies cluster is a reading group that discusses how evolutionary and ecological science has informed what is “natural” about human sexuality to delineate certain sexual behaviors as normal or aberrant, according to their website.

The group appears to argue that social and cultural norms throughout the ages have had biased science toward validating certain sexual behaviors and gender identities while invalidating others, according to its online statements.

RBP
01-29-2018, 02:04 PM
This is all subjects at many universities. Every course I had in my masters program included social justice as a theme, many specifically addressing feminist theory.

Teh One Who Knocks
01-29-2018, 02:41 PM
This is all subjects at many universities. Every course I had in my masters program included social justice as a theme, many specifically addressing feminist theory.

In some things I can see them trying to insert their feminist propaganda, but when they try and do it (and justify it) in the hard sciences and maths, it's just beyond bizarre and makes it that much easier to dismiss them as a lunatic fringe.

DemonGeminiX
01-29-2018, 03:56 PM
There is literally no way to feminize math. Or Physics, or Chemistry, or Engineering, or Architecture, or.... either for that matter. We're talking about stuff that has absolutely no opinion involved in it. It's not about what's in between your legs. You're either right, or you're wrong. There's no in-between here. :lol:

Teh One Who Knocks
01-29-2018, 04:37 PM
There is literally no way to feminize math. Or Physics, or Chemistry, or Engineering, or Architecture, or.... either for that matter. We're talking about stuff that has absolutely no opinion involved in it. It's not about what's in between your legs. You're either right, or you're wrong. There's no in-between here. :lol:

:hand:


Academic Journal: Newtonian Physics Is ‘Oppressive’ to Marginalized People
by Katherine Timpf - The National Review


https://i.imgur.com/NBn2bc5.jpg

A feminist scholar has published a paper claiming that Newtonian physics is oppressive and that we must use “quantum feminisms” to make the science more intersectional.

In a paper for The Minnesota Review, culture and gender-studies researcher Whitney Stark argues that Newton’s understanding of physics is oppressive because it has “separated beings” based on their “binary and absolute differences” — a structure that she calls “hierarchical and exploitative” — and the same kind of system is “embedded in many structures of classification,” making it “part of the apparatus that enables oppression.” Stark explains:


This structural thinking of individualized separatism with binary and absolute differences as the basis for how the universe works seeped into/poured over/ is embedded in many structures of classification, which understand similarity and difference in the world, imposed in many hierarchical and exploitative organizational structures, whether through gender, life/nonlife, national borders, and so on.

According to Stark, the tendency to categorize in this way particularly hurts marginalized people because it can cause the activist efforts of minority groups to be “overshadowed” by the efforts of dominant groups.

“For instance, in many ‘official’ feminist histories of the United States, black/African American women’s organizing and writing are completely unaccounted for before the 1973 creation of the middle-class, professional National Black Feminist Organization,” Stark writes.

“Part of this absence is the frequent subsuming of intersectional identities under supposedly encompassing meta-identities more readily recognized by/as hegemonicized groupings,” she continues. “For instance, black women subsumed under ‘black,’ equated with male, or ‘feminist’ equated with white women.”

Thankfully, Stark has a solution to this very clearly serious problem: “quantum feminisms” and “intersectionality.”

“By taking a critical look at the noncentralized and multiple movements of quantum physics, and by dehierarchizing the necessity of linear bodies through time, it becomes possible to reconfigure structures of value, longevity, and subjectivity in ways explicitly aligned with anti-oppression practices and identity politics,” she writes. “Combining intersectionality and quantum physics can provide for differing perspectives on organizing practices long used by marginalized people, for enabling apparatuses that allow for new possibilities of safer spaces.”

Honestly, all of this makes perfect sense. Personally, whenever I think about oppression, the very first thing that comes to my mind is: “Damn it Isaac Newton! This is all your fault!” I’m just glad someone is finally writing about it. Maybe someday we can take it a step further, and replace all lessons on Newton in our schools with lessons on quantum feminisms. Ah, yes. Then, and only then, will our nation be truly great.

Teh One Who Knocks
01-29-2018, 04:39 PM
https://i.imgur.com/cRlOHc1.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/ri6jY1z.jpg

RBP
01-29-2018, 04:47 PM
There is literally no way to feminize math. Or Physics, or Chemistry, or Engineering, or Architecture, or.... either for that matter. We're talking about stuff that has absolutely no opinion involved in it. It's not about what's in between your legs. You're either right, or you're wrong. There's no in-between here. :lol:

Teaching methods and curriculum have drastically changed in an effort to make math more "female friendly". At the expense of boys, mind you.

Hal-9000
01-29-2018, 07:09 PM
Women can be science teachers??

:shock:

Teh One Who Knocks
01-29-2018, 07:16 PM
Women can be science teachers??

:shock:

#misogyny
#patriarchy
#WhiteMalePrivilege

Hal-9000
01-29-2018, 07:18 PM
:hand:

We let them smoke in public and vote, one step at a time please.

DemonGeminiX
01-29-2018, 09:38 PM
This is all bullshit.

1 + 1 = 2.

Make that gender specific.

Hal-9000
01-29-2018, 10:05 PM
This is all bullshit.

1 + 1 = 2.

Make that gender specific.

It's the equation of heterosexuality implying that all relationships have to be man/woman in gender in order to have a child.

DemonGeminiX
01-29-2018, 10:37 PM
:meh:

Go away, bed wetter.

deebakes
01-31-2018, 04:30 AM
Wow... just, wow...