PDA

View Full Version : Goldman Sachs asks in biotech research report: 'Is curing patients a sustainable business model?



PorkChopSandwiches
04-12-2018, 06:38 PM
Goldman Sachs analysts attempted to address a touchy subject for biotech companies, especially those involved in the pioneering "gene therapy" treatment: cures could be bad for business in the long run.

"Is curing patients a sustainable business model?" analysts ask in an April 10 report entitled "The Genome Revolution."

"The potential to deliver 'one shot cures' is one of the most attractive aspects of gene therapy, genetically-engineered cell therapy and gene editing. However, such treatments offer a very different outlook with regard to recurring revenue versus chronic therapies," analyst Salveen Richter wrote in the note to clients Tuesday. "While this proposition carries tremendous value for patients and society, it could represent a challenge for genome medicine developers looking for sustained cash flow."

Biotech shares soar on dealmaking, drug progress
3:41 PM ET Mon, 9 April 2018 | 01:37
Richter cited Gilead Sciences' treatments for hepatitis C, which achieved cure rates of more than 90 percent. The company's U.S. sales for these hepatitis C treatments peaked at $12.5 billion in 2015, but have been falling ever since. Goldman estimates the U.S. sales for these treatments will be less than $4 billion this year, according to a table in the report.

"GILD is a case in point, where the success of its hepatitis C franchise has gradually exhausted the available pool of treatable patients," the analyst wrote. "In the case of infectious diseases such as hepatitis C, curing existing patients also decreases the number of carriers able to transmit the virus to new patients, thus the incident pool also declines … Where an incident pool remains stable (eg, in cancer) the potential for a cure poses less risk to the sustainability of a franchise."

The analyst didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.

The report suggested three potential solutions for biotech firms:

"Solution 1: Address large markets: Hemophilia is a $9-10bn WW market (hemophilia A, B), growing at ~6-7% annually."

"Solution 2: Address disorders with high incidence: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) affects the cells (neurons) in the spinal cord, impacting the ability to walk, eat, or breathe."

"Solution 3: Constant innovation and portfolio expansion: There are hundreds of inherited retinal diseases (genetics forms of blindness) … Pace of innovation will also play a role as future programs can offset the declining revenue trajectory of prior assets."

DemonGeminiX
04-12-2018, 07:12 PM
Nothing new to see here. Move along.

PorkChopSandwiches
04-12-2018, 07:36 PM
Lance has argued that if they could come up with a cure they would, I argued this point ;)

DemonGeminiX
04-12-2018, 07:52 PM
You're right. I've known this for the better part of two decades. If you want to see the most vile acts of the most evil of men, don't look any further than our own medical industry.

I will die in this wheelchair knowing full well that I could have been cured years ago, probably not long after I became paralyzed, but because of the money that could be lost from "coping therapies and products" surrounding neurological injuries, they will not cure paralysis. We have all of the tools we need at our disposal to do it.

Yes, they will condemn whole populations of people to years of suffering and death, and they will do it for a shiny penny.