PDA

View Full Version : Pills prevent HIV in straight men and women



Teh One Who Knocks
07-13-2011, 11:19 AM
By MIKE STOBBE - AP Medical Writer


ATLANTA (AP) — Two new studies found that daily pills prevented infection with the AIDS virus in heterosexual men and women in Africa, bringing new hope for someday offering a medical shield against HIV infection.

"This is good news. This is a good day for HIV prevention," said Dr. Lynn Paxton of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, who has coordinated the agency's research into HIV prevention.

Earlier this year, another study found the same pills did not prevent the AIDS virus among women in Kenya, Tanzania and South Africa. But researchers now say that study may have been flawed based on the success of the two studies announced Wednesday.

The first of the new studies, run by the CDC, involved more than 1,200 men and women in Botswana. About half got a daily pill, Truvada, an HIV treatment made by Gilead Sciences Inc. The other half got a fake pill.

An analysis of people who were believed to be regularly taking the pills found four of those on Truvada became infected with HIV, compared to 19 on the dummy pill. That means the real drug lowered the risk of infection by roughly 78 percent, researchers said.

The second study was funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and run by the University of Washington. It involved more than 4,700 heterosexual couples in Kenya and Uganda. In each couple, one partner had HIV and the other did not. The uninfected were given either daily placebos, Truvada pills, or another Gilead treatment, Viread.

The study found 13 HIV infections among those on Truvada, 18 in those on Viread, and 47 of those on dummy pills. So the medications reduced the risk of HIV infection by 62 percent to 73 percent, the researchers said.

An independent review panel on Sunday said the benefit was clear-cut and stopped giving placebos, instead offering the preventive pills. Essentially, they deemed it unethical to withhold the medications from people who had been on placebo, said Dr. Jared Baeten, the University of Washington researcher who co-chaired the study.

"Our results provide clear evidence that this works in heterosexuals," he said.

In both studies, participants also were offered counseling and free condoms, which may help explain the relatively low overall infection rate.

The studies were to be announced at an AIDS conference in Rome next week. But following the recommendation of the review panel to the University of Washington study, both the CDC and the Washington team made hasty decisions to release the results.

These are the third and fourth widely reported studies of AIDS prevention medications.

The first was announced last year. It was a study of Truvada in gay men in Peru, Ecuador, Brazil, South Africa, Thailand and the United States (San Francisco and Boston). The drug lowered the chances of infection by 44 percent, and by 73 percent or more among men who took their pills most faithfully.

Experts celebrated. The CDC gave advice to doctors on prescribing Truvada along with other prevention services for gay men, based on those encouraging results.

But momentum seemed to stall in April, when an interim analysis of the study of 3,900 women in Kenya, Tanzania and South Africa did not show a benefit from taking Truvada.

Scientists are still piecing together why that study pointed to failure and the two latest indicate success. One theory is that the women in the earlier study did not take the medication as often as they should have, Paxton said.

Gilead Sciences of Foster City, Calif., is a major producer of AIDS drugs. On Tuesday, United Nations health officials announced the company had agreed to allow some of its drugs to be made by generic manufacturers, potentially increasing their availability in poor countries.

Loser
07-13-2011, 01:25 PM
Warning, "________" may cause sterility, blindness, random anal leakage, penile dysfunction, hair loss, strokes, heart attacks, death, etc.....

Why not just...ya know....use a fucking rubber, or not fuck like rabbits? :roll:

Hugh_Janus
07-13-2011, 06:17 PM
oh.... so there's a drug that prevents you getting HIV, but it only works if you're not gay.... wat? :lol:

Hal-9000
07-13-2011, 06:25 PM
that's what I'm trying to muddle thru...HIV is an infection, it doesn't recognize sexual stereotypes :lol:

Teh One Who Knocks
07-13-2011, 06:28 PM
It knows :shifty:

Hal-9000
07-13-2011, 06:31 PM
"In each couple, one partner had HIV and the other did not. The uninfected were given either daily placebos, Truvada pills, or another Gilead treatment, Viread."



boy...that's a game of Russian Roulette that I'll take a pass on.....ffs :lol:

JoeyB
07-13-2011, 09:49 PM
"An analysis of people who were believed to be regularly taking the pills found four of those on Truvada became infected with HIV, compared to 19 on the dummy pill. That means the real drug lowered the risk of infection by roughly 78 percent, researchers said."

So it doesn't actually prevent shit...it just possibly coincidentally lowered the risk in a few test subjects.

Business summation: let's sell this stuff and make money!

FBD
07-13-2011, 09:55 PM
yeah, that doesnt appear to be a statistically rigorous sample there :lol:

Godfather
07-14-2011, 02:42 AM
Yeah... call me when the test group has a few more figures behind it. Sounds like they're getting close though... hopefully a vaccine comes out soon.

Mostly because I'm selfish. My girlfriend is a med student who will be a doctor in 4 more years. What if she pricks herself (I understand everyone will eventually do it) and becomes infected by some AIDs ridden sicko? It could ruin our lives :wha: But I worry that she will bring me home aaaall kinds of diseases :lol: Should be fun for this (fairly mild) hypochondriac.

Deepsepia
07-15-2011, 11:53 PM
yeah, that doesnt appear to be a statistically rigorous sample there :lol:

It was, actually.



Through May 31, 2011, a total of 78 HIV infections occurred in the study: 18 among those assigned TDF, 13 among those assigned to FTC/TDF, and 47 among those assigned placebo. Thus, those who received TDF had an average of 62% fewer HIV infections (95% CI 34 to 78%, p=0.0003) and those who received FTC/TDF had 73% fewer HIV infections (95% CI 49 to 85%, p<0.0001) than those who received placebo.


The data support the conclusion that the finding that these drugs prevented transmission is statistically robust: although the confidence intervals are broad the reduction in infection even at the lower end is still very large.

This was a very difficult study to do, methodologically. The ethical requirement was that all the participants had to be aggressively counseled to use safe sex-- it would have been unethical to do the study otherwise. So it was expected, and found, that they had a lower HIV transmission rate in study participants than you'd have in the general population (because study participants are being encouraged in every way possible to be safe).

The actual number of participants was just under 10,000, and the design of the study very subtle



Of the 4,758 couples enrolled in the study, one-third of the HIV uninfected partners were randomly allocated to receive TDF, one- third FTC/TDF, and one-third a matching placebo. The study was double-blinded, meaning that both study participants and the researchers who interacted with them did not know which treatment the participants were receiving. All study participants received a comprehensive package of HIV prevention services, which included intensive safer sex counseling (both individually and as a couple), HIV testing, free condoms, testing and treatment for sexually transmitted infections, and monitoring and care for HIV infection


You can read the University of Washington press release here:
http://depts.washington.edu/uwicrc/research/studies/files/PrEP_PressRelease-UW_13Jul2011.pdf

and their FAQ on the study here:
http://depts.washington.edu/uwicrc/research/studies/files/PrEP_FAQ.pdf

JoeyB
07-16-2011, 05:18 AM
That means the real drug lowered the risk of infection by roughly 78 percent, researchers said

This is the problem. Drug companies will be selling this for massive profits...all the while giving people a false sense of security. Safe sex education is still the 'safe'r and more effective method.

Deepsepia
07-16-2011, 05:29 AM
That means the real drug lowered the risk of infection by roughly 78 percent, researchers said
This is the problem. Drug companies will be selling this for massive profits...all the while giving people a false sense of security. Safe sex education is still the 'safe'r and more effective method.

Well, in the study they were directly comparing the folks using the drugs, with those who were using safer sex.

Remember, this was placebo controlled . . . all of the couples had one HIV+ partner, and one HIV- partner.

They were aware of the risk of contracting the disease, were highly motivated, and clearly very effective at safe sex -- consider that of the 4800 couples, 1/3 were on complete placebo, and of those 1600 couples, only 47 contracted HIV. That's an excellent outcome, indicating that the folks were being pretty careful -- 1/4 of one percent. The usual seroconversion rate of heterosexual partners of HIV+ is several per cent per year.

JoeyB
07-16-2011, 09:47 PM
Yes but, will they only sell this drug to HIGHLY MOTIVATED people? No. They'll sell it to everyone, and create a false and dangerous sense of security. That is the problem I am trying to highlight.