Closer Examination of MH17 Complete

http://www.globalresearch.ca/how-the...eckage/5435094


Its a tad long, but shows in rather unequivocal terms that it was not a BUK.

Skipping posting it here, its long enough I neednt bother, easier read over there.

but here's the conclusion:

 

CONCLUSION: A combined strike from a Su-25 M1 attack jet was performed against the Malaysian Boeing. The first attack from the Su-25M1 was performed on the course of the “Boeing” flight in pursuit — most likely the attack jet was located on the right side of the tail of the Malaysian airplane and fired while moving towards the right engine — in this direction the jet made several shots using its 23 mm or 30 mm aircraft cannon.

The pilots died after the first attack, a large-scale decompression occurred in the cabin, the electronics went out of order, the plane turned right and the “Boeing” was probably attacked by the attack jet again, but this time on the left side, in the cabin area from the side of the crew commander using the aircraft cannon and a R-60M rocket in the area of the left engine and the left door, on which the traces of penetration by rod-shaped sub-projectiles remained.

Justifications for these statements - you must read to get them :thumbsup:

Nice try hangin' it on Putin though, NATO

http://www.globalresearch.ca/malaysi...eckage/5446724

Malaysian Airlines M17: Canon Bullet Discovered in MH17 Wreckage


a 30mm cannon bullet....of course suppressed by the "news"
http://www.globalresearch.ca/wp-cont...e-1024x601.jpg

The bullet is in view only for 3 seconds; from 1′ 36″ to 1′ 39″.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDtqf0cqOCE

For your reading pleasure... I am not engaging this, I am simply providing you a source that disagrees with that theory based on the capabilities of the aircraft.

https://scottlocklin.wordpress.com/2...ot-down-a-777/

i don't think it ever crashed in the first place :shrug:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RBP

For your reading pleasure... I am not engaging this, I am simply providing you a source that disagrees with that theory based on the capabilities of the aircraft.

https://scottlocklin.wordpress.com/2...ot-down-a-777/

---

I find it tough to put much stock in something that disagrees based on theory and no examination of evidence, though. I mean that's almost like theorizing a fire took down...nevermind :lol: