I guess my past posts probably read like jokes but seriously...if Superman was written as a single white male, why can't his history be just that?
Create something new :tup:
Printable View
We're redoing Bugs Bunny, now he will be represented by a queer trans-female turtle :tup:
:|
I don't disagree. Her being 008 would be far better. It's virtue signaling taking the moniker from Bond to prove woke-ness. I'm just trying to be positive here and find ways to squish this into the cannon of the universe in my head, as I love James Bond so god damn much and want it to be an incredible send-off for Craig :lol:
*head buried in sand gif*
I think with all forms of media...there are some things that deserve to remain in their original form. We both know it's a form of wokeness to take a beloved character and then change everything about it. What I won't agree with is when it seems like a production company just targets something because the lead is a white male. There are some instances where white males did shit :lol:
and I think 008 was killed and they may have replaced him at one point...
*you're concerned about Craig's send off and I'm still waiting for Connery's :lol:
Craig's Bond is better than Connery and it's not close
:nana:
I've seen Tom Hardy proposed as the next Bond. He's a phenomenal actor... I wonder if he'd even want that role? He's a super diverse actor and Bond kind of type-casts you for life. Also makes you rich as shit though...
The opening scope scene is extended by 6 more minutes and sees Bond slowly hobbling out using a walker. He goes to turn, draw, and fire like in earlier movies but instead he freezes midturn, then collapses and screams "UHHH!!! MY BACK! IT HURTS!!! MY BACK!!!"