side by sides showing that these fucks were talking straight to each other and then saying the exact opposite friggin things to the public
side by sides showing that these fucks were talking straight to each other and then saying the exact opposite friggin things to the public
FBD (06-08-2021)
lost in melb. (06-09-2021)
"The construction of the Chinese laboratory at the centre of mounting suspicion over the source of the Covid-19 pandemic was signed off by the EU’s chief Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier – despite warnings by French intelligence services."
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-warnings.html
Wait until people know it wasnt just Fauci signing up to fund Wuhan
except for bubble boy of course, he'll stay in his bubble until reality forcibly pops it
Watch: Fauci Pal Daszak Admits "Chinese Colleagues" Developing "Killer" Coronaviruses
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/w...-coronaviruses
Its getting to be about time, we need to have a "who's going to be the first covid19 arrest" pollWhile describing how his organization sequences deadly viruses, Daszak describes the process of “insert[ing] spike proteins” into viruses to see if they can “bind to human cells” as being carried out by his “colleagues in China”:
“Then when you get a sequence of a virus, and it looks like a relative of a known nasty pathogen, just like we did with SARS. We found other coronaviruses in bats, a whole host of them, some of them looked very similar to SARS. So we sequenced the spike protein: the protein that attaches to cells. Then we…
Well I didn’t do this work, but my colleagues in China did the work. You create pseudo particles, you insert the spike proteins from those viruses, see if they bind to human cells. At each step of this you move closer and closer to this virus could really become pathogenic in people.
“You end up with a small number of viruses that really do look like killers,” he adds.
Last edited by FBD; 06-09-2021 at 01:57 PM.
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/w...ug-treat-covid
WHO Chief Scientist Served Legal Notice In India For Allegedly Suppressing Data On Drug To Treat COVID-19
The Indian Bar Association has taken legal action against the World Health Organization’s (WHO) Chief Scientist Dr. Soumya Swaminathan for her alleged role in spreading disinformation on the use of ivermectin to treat COVID-19.
The association served a legal notice (pdf) on Swaminathan on May 25, claiming that she was “spreading disinformation and misguiding the people of India, in order to fulfill her agenda” and sought to prevent her from “causing further damage.”
They further say that Swaminathan, in her statements against the use of ivermectin, ignored research and clinical trials from two organizations - the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care (FLCCC) Alliance and the British Ivermectin Recommendation Development (BIRD) - who have presented solid data showing ivermectin prevents and treats COVID-19.
“Dr. Soumya Swaminathan has ignored these studies/reports and has deliberately suppressed the data regarding effectiveness of the drug Ivermectin, with an intent to dissuade the people of India from using Ivermectin,” the plaintiff said in a statement
Last edited by FBD; 06-09-2021 at 01:57 PM.
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/w...covid-outbreak
Watch: WHO Advisor Says China Engaged In "Massive Cover-Up" Of COVID Outbreak
Appearing on Fox News, Jamie Metzl urged that “The Chinese have engaged in a massive cover-up that is going on until this day, involving destroying samples, hiding records, placing a universal gag order on Chinese scientists and imprisoning Chinese citizen journalists asking the most basic questions.”
Metzl, a former State Department official and Senate Foreign Relations Committee staffer, added that “The more that China stonewalls, the more suspicious that it looks.”
Metzl also recently described Dr Peter Daszak’s attempts to have the scientific community dismiss the lab leak theory out of hand as “scientific propaganda and a form of thuggery and intimidation.”
“By labelling anyone with different views a conspiracy theorist, the Lancet letter was the worst form of bullying in full contravention of the scientific method,” Metzl noted.
beginning of the end
https://www.wsj.com/articles/wuhan-l...d=hp_lead_pos5
Here is Bernard Roiznam, one of the signers of the letter. He admits he was lied to and that the most likely explanation is a lab leak, the opposite of what the letter says.
Scientists have leaked a letter than Fauci sent to hundreds of scientists on Feb 18, 2020. The letter threatens anyone that even suggests the possibility of a lab leak will be smeared as a conspiracy theorists.
7 of the signatures on the letter belonging to eter Daszak (President), Rita Colwell & James Hughes (BoD members), William Karesh (EVP for Health and Policy), Hume Field, Juan Lubroth, John Mackenzie, were from people who worked for EcoHealth - the organization doing gain of function research.
12 of the people who signed the letter have since reversed their position on the letter. They say they were lied to about what the letter would say by Peter Daszak.
But we're only halfway there so far - we havent gotten on to the part about is being on purpose yet
FOIA reveals that Australia authorized Pfizer jab without ever even looking at their data
https://doctors4covidethics.org/pfiz...-sight-unseen/
A Freedom of Information request to the Australian drugs regulator that approved the Pfizer vaccine confirms that they have never seen the study data
A freedom of information request (FOI) request was made by one of our members in February 2021 to the Australian drugs regulator, the TGA (Therapeutic Good Administration) to ask what should have been simple questions. The TGA is the Australian equivalent of the FDA (US), MHRA (UK) and EMA (Europe) and is held in high regard worldwide. Essentially the FOI questions were:
Did the TGA request the raw data from Pfizer
Did any of the committees approving the vaccine look at the raw data and/or discuss it
What were the “studies” referred to in the approval document relating to teratogenicity (risk of harm to a fetus)
The rationale of the request relates to concern over the validity and verifiability of Pfizer’s data given its legal history (and expressed by Peter Doshi in the BMJ in February) as well as the proven concerns over fraudulent data relating to Covid-19 as seen in the “Lancetgate” scandal of June 2020.
The document below is a redacted version of the documents that were sent by the TGA in response to this request. What they show is that the TGA never saw or requested the patient data from Pfizer and simply accepted their reporting of their study as true. This means that when the head of the TGA John Skerritt said that “the safety evidence is pretty thorough” on the 6th February (here) his words would ring hollow to most Australians who have assumed, rightly or wrongly, that the TGA had actually looked at the patient data themselves.
A further concerning aspect of the FOI request is the efforts to which the TGA appeared to go to suppress the request – initially requesting a 6 months extension in view of a “voluminous request” which eventually yielded only one document of 14 pages, heavily redacted. This required an instruction from the Office of the Information Commissioner to the TGA to answer the request by the 26th May, a deadline that the TGA also failed to meet.
Eventually the only document that was produced from the FOI request was a heavily redacted single study (not studies, as claimed in the TGA assessment document) showing that the only investigation into the effects on the fetus was performed on 44 rats with no long term data on the offspring. It is impossible to assess this study fully because 98% of the document was removed in order to protect Pfizer’s intellectual property (points 32-44 of the report).
The full FOI report should appear on the TGA website in due course at the following link
https://www.tga.gov.au/documents-rel...-2019-jun-2020