Lane had been on the force for just over a year and yet he still questioned Chauvin twice.
Lane asked “should we roll him on his side” and Chauvin allegedly responded: “That’s why we have him on his stomach.”
“I am worried about excited delirium or whatever," Lane said, according to the charging document, before Chauvin allegedly answered: “That’s why we have him on his stomach.”
Lane was worried about Excited Delirium -
https://www.slideshare.net/citinfo/c...cited-delirium
Lane, a rookie, still remembered his training and questioned Chauvin, a veteran of nearly two decades, on his conduct. Not once, but twice even after being shot down the first time.
Have you ever spoken up to a superior who you know is doing something wrong? Have you done it twice after they tell you to shut up the first time? Maybe you have or could, but you can't say it's easy.
Did Lane do enough? Absolutely not. Should he be tried for the same crime as Chauvin, or even the other two cops? I don't believe so. Additionally, this information is even more damning for Chauvin. It proves that, not only did he act in a reckless and violent manner that resulted in the death of George Floyd, but he was consciously aware that he was flouting training, and of the risks of his actions AS HE WAS IN THE ACT, because even a rookie was warning him.
Had Chauvin possessed an ounce of human decency or the humility to listen to the rookie cop assisting him, George Floyd may still be alive today.
If Lane, as an unsure rookie, had the balls to physically tackle and restrain a veteran of nearly two decades during an active arrest, maybe George Floyd would still be alive.
However, that's an incredible thing to ask of someone.