The Covid Conspiracy Thread

[FBD]

"The sequence that's in these doses, at billions of copies per dose, interacts with the P53 gene. This is a tumor suppressor gene so anything that interacts as a contaminant in the gene is a red flag. Hit the brakes, stop cold. You've got billions of copies of something that interact with our tumor suppressor system. This is a cancer risk. It's in Moderna's patents. We know it's now in the Pfizer vaccines. This needs to be a red stop halt."

ayyyyy caramba

lol he mentions about the shots being different than the ones that were actually approved

my god's pretty sure he can get me through this, but...

"this program added these annontations....now this means that when pfizer handed this over, one of their people had to go remove these annotations..."

ouch, must watch


good news GF, he said the Canadian batches they examined were the cleanest out of what they examined

[FBD]

that's called amyloidosis

dont look it up, you dont want to see the details

[FBD]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=de...BCYQwo&t=1489s

[FBD]

depop tool

[FBD]

[FBD]

coroner/funeral director on these white fibrous clots coming out of way too many

"yeah, we're seeing this in about 25% of them these days"
"this started in 2021, not before"

[FBD]

came across another good twitter that has a bunch of good points that everyone should know

https://twitter.com/BlackTomThePyr8

ouch....the more I look at these datasets, the more bad I feel for everyone that took it

[FBD]

https://twitter.com/RepMTG/status/1745851057362927821

1h 42m OF THIS HEARING
>"CAN BIO-WEAPONS BE TARGETED BY RACE?"
>"TECHNICALLY IT'S POSSIBLE."

[FBD]

France going full retard with "laws" mandating forced medical experimentations

[FBD]

for those who think the clots are fake

[FBD]

US Officials Concede No Active Surveillance On Long-Term Effects Of COVID-19 Vaccines

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/...id-19-vaccines

In a Feb. 15 hearing by the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, U.S. health officials side-stepped a question when asked whether the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is actively conducting extended safety surveillance on those who received early COVID-19 vaccines.


Rep. Nicole Malliotakis (R-N.Y.) asked Dr. Peter Marks, director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, whether the FDA is conducting active surveillance and if there are any specific health markers they’re studying that may signal trends requiring further inquiry.

“Every time we go through and do the safety surveillance, we start back, and it goes back to 2020. In some cases where we’re looking for certain things, we might use a different window, but indeed, we have to look from the beginning of the period of surveillance. I can turn it over to Dr. Jernigan because he can speak for CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] in that regard,” Dr. Marks said.

“So with regard to myocarditis, we certainly have been monitoring the issue with various different data systems. I think the most recent data really demonstrates that you’re about eight times less likely to get myocarditis if you’re vaccinated compared to those that are unvaccinated,” Dr. Daniel Jernigan, director of the National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases at the CDC responded.

Rep. Malliotakis told Jernigan she wanted to know about “everything,” not just myocarditis.

Dr. Jerrigan asked her to repeat the question, and she asked again whether the FDA was conducting extended safety surveillance on early recipients of COVID-19 vaccines.

“Most of the reports that we get of adverse events are in the few weeks following the vaccination,” Jernigan said. In terms of monitoring these over time, Jernigan said the agency has “vaccine effectiveness” systems in place at the CDC.

Neither Jernigan nor Marks referenced any active surveillance initiatives being undertaken by their agencies to monitor people who received the original COVID-19 vaccines for long-term health effects.

“There is no system in place for long-term vaccine safety surveillance in this country,” Ms. Liz Willner, founder of OpenVAERS, told The Epoch Times.

[FBD]

Another one knocked out of the park by Arkmedic, the guy who wrote "How to BLAST your way to the truth regarding the origins of COVID-19"

Long story short: (((they))) have a pattern of this behavior and 2019 was not the first time the CDC medical industrial tyranny complex attacked populations with bioweapons


https://www.arkmedic.info/p/paperclip-panda-monium

Those of you paying attention to twitter and substack over the last few weeks should have noticed a few strange things happening. Rather than going into the detail there is a common theme, which is that people in the “medical freedom movement” seem to be all fighting each other. It’s not organic of course, but simply reflects the reality that the intelligence community and its tentacle agencies run chaos agents to break up any groups gaining traction in highlighting corruption, criminal activity and war crimes committed in the biological sciences.

[Yes, war crimes. Don’t worry we’ll come to that.]

And if you think the idea that the intelligence agencies want to break up dissident groups is some sort of “conspiracy theory” look no further than these two authoritative articles:




This is the why:

The development of Biological weapons, or those that could be used as biological weapons, was made illegal under the Bioweapons Convention (BWC) ratified by the USA and USSR (Soviet Block) in 1972

The USA and Soviet block continued to develop biological weapons beyond 1972 in programs that were run under the fraudulent guise of "dual use" and were therefore war crimes.


DARPA of course was the body that funded (or ahem, “we didn’t actually fund it”) the production of the SARS-Cov-2 virus at the Wuhan Institute of Virology - explained in detail with proof in this article from 2022 (if you haven’t read this you should):
Absolute proof: The Gp-120 sequences prove beyond all doubt that "COVID-19" was man-made

Of course the soviets had spies in the US side of Paperclip but that just made the US rebrand their operation and the Nazi operation eventually became DARPA. No I’m not kidding. From RFK Jr’s book “The Wuhan cover up” quoting Jacobsen:

in 1963, the FBI learned that the JIAO director, Lieutenant Colonel Henry Whalen, was a Soviet spy. The Pentagon officially disbanded the JIOA (the official Paperclip agency), tried and sentenced Whalen in secret, and rebranded operation Paperclip as the cutting-edge science agency, the Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA), later renamed DARPA


The CDC’s Iraq Bioweapons Program

There are so many shocking things I have learnt about the NIH-CDC and their corrupt activities but none is probably as shocking as this:

In 1989 the CDC sent biological weapons to Iraq. The following year, the Gulf war was started which eventually spawned the Iraq war. The pretext for the Iraq war was the claim that Iraq had biological weapons, which the CDC had sent to them.

The US CDC had therefore set up the Iraq war 14 years earlier. Over a million people are estimated to have died as a result of the Iraq war in 2003-2011

Yes of course I have the references for this amazing claim but first please take 20 seconds to read it again. The CDC provided the biological weapons that were used to start the Iraq war. Those old enough should remember this picture, which should shame every member of the US and UK military.


how did Colin Powell know that Saddam Hussein had “weapons of mass destruction”?

Because the USA’s CDC had supplied them, that’s how.



And it wasn’t just anthrax - as if that was bad enough.

The biological weapons supplied to Iraq by the US included Aflatoxin and Mycoplasma Incognitus.

The mycoplasma incognitus strains that were supplied to Iraq were eventually recognised as at least one of the underlying causes of Gulf War syndrome.


But of course Mycoplasma Incognitus didn’t just “appear naturally”. Because it was patented - by Shyh-Ching Lo at the US military who then went to work for the FDA in the cell biology division (CBER).

And it wasn’t just mycoplasma and anthrax that went to Iraq as “samples” so the Iraqis could develop their own biological weapons program. Per wikipedia referencing the US AMRIID handbook

After 1995, it was learned that, in all, Iraq had produced 19,000 liters of concentrated botulinum toxin (nearly 10,000 liters filled into munitions), 8,500 liters of concentrated anthrax (6,500 liters filled into munitions) and 2,200 liters of aflatoxin (1,580 liters filled into munitions).[9]

And what is Aflatoxin? A very nasty toxin created from Aspergillus which is a kind of mould

Aflatoxin is a known biological warfare agent which was already identified by UNSCOM in Iraq in 1995, after the CDC sent “samples” to Iraq.

Now let me just summarise before we take a slight detour before the finale, because it’s important.

The CDC sent biological weapons to Iraq in 1989-90 before the first Gulf War. In order to create a pretext for the second Gulf War the US claimed that Iraq had biological weapons yet failed to tell the world they knew this because they had furnished Iraq with them.

The biological weapons armamentarium, well documented, included mycoplasma patented by US military researchers (leading to Gulf War Syndrome) and aflatoxins, which are derived from aspergillus.

I cut a bunch out to make this part a bit more brief, there's a bunch more detail to this and includes the scientists by which these things came about and how these things are linked together. It establishes that these people set this up a long time ago and have been doing this bullshit this whole time of threatening people with bioweapons, just like Khaddafi said.

with the gulf war syndrome we literally have a similar situation as ronas/vaxxed whereby people were exposed to some stuff and exhibited some symptoms - and to prevent it from being worse, medical experiments were done, from which there are also other side effects that may or may not overlap with the pathogens that were created and sent for exposure to begin with.



very good observation from the top comment:

Great article! The 'PANDATA' crew have become increasingly hostile and obnoxious in their rhetoric; one tried to insist there was no way for a virus to transfer from 'humanized mice' to humans. The mechanism is literally in the name of the type of genetically modified mouse.

It isn't possible to refer to evidence given such evidently partisan hostilities (The Daily Beagle compiled numerous examples of vaccine research labs causing outbreaks: https://thedailybeagle.substack.com/...ers-are-behind).

If the gain-of-function (GoF) research didn't exist, why did Ralph Baric have to fight with the White House to get the 'pause' on GoF overturned? Answer: Ralph Baric was engaging in gain-of-function.

"He [Ralph Baric] recalls that when he came back to work that Monday, he opened his email and was stunned to learn about the moratorium. He thought of all his lab's research projects. "It took me 10 seconds to realize that most of them were going to be affected," he says."

https://www.npr.org/sections/health-...virus-research

If GoF doesn't exist, what was the White House trying to ban?

If GoF doesn't exist and Ralph Baric wasn't doing it, why was Ralph Baric trying to overturn the law?

If GoF doesn't exist, why was Baric serializing SARS-WIV-1 through humanized mice, and not just using normal mice? Why was he trying to put a human virus into humanized mice if the virus wasn't intended for humans?

If GoF doesn't exist, why are so many countries trying to establish as many BSL-2, 3 and 4 labs as possible? Why was China trying to build a lab if it wasn't engaging in GoF research?

The evidence gain-of-function research is occurring is overwhelming. The sad part is they're still doing it.

Here's a real play: if PANDA think GoF does not exist, then call their bluff and have them endorse legislation banning it. As it supposedly doesn't exist they're not going to run afoul of the law and should have zero objections to it being outright banned.

[FBD]

This is big bloomberg publishing an article admitting the vax can seriously fuck you up. Could not even imagine this being in the mainstream media a month ago.

https://msn.com/en-us/money/other/la...lth-conditions

link to study
https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...64410X24001270

[FBD]

every time I even so much as peek, there's more and more and more

this is someone who noticed a looooong time ago and has been paying attention the whole time and notes Epstein's connections in the biomed industry



https://www.scivisionpub.com/pdfs/co...tions-2432.pdf

[FBD]

Novavax - Controlled Opposition
https://thedailybeagle.substack.com/...led-opposition

Transfection is a process by which foreign nucleic acids are delivered into a eukaryotic cell to modify the host cell's genetic makeup (Kim & Eberwine, 2010; Chow et al., 2016)

Why are we so annoyed at Novavax? Well, the shortstop is they’re part of the transfection party too.

The flaws with the Novavax shots were originally exposed by the indomitable Jikkyleaks, who started raising awareness of what they dubbed ‘#novagate’.

https://twitter.com/Jikkyleaks/statu...60658881749273

Well, it turns out it does indeed include saponins. And insect cell proteins (‘you ville inject zee bugs’). And DNA. And Polysorbate 80. And bits of tree. Did we mention it contains DNA?

[a whole ton of stuff showing how saponins are transfection agents]

So clearly the main feature of saponins is their ability to transfect, and yet Novavax misleadingly calls saponins an ‘adjuvant’ (‘something that heightens an immune response’), and omits the obviously genotoxic properties.

The saponin iceberg gets bigger, and using Novavax’s poor disguise of ‘adjuvant’, we found multiple companies use saponins and they all claim it is simply an adjuvant with no mention to the transfection abilities

A 32 year old vaccine with a saponin transfection reagent, only deployed… now?

That is to say, in 1987 — the same year the saponin containing Malaria vaccine Mosquirix was invented — they discovered that lipids can be paired with DNA to form ‘nanoplexes’ facilitating DNA uptake into a cell. And if it sounds suspiciously like how mRNA carrying LNPs work, it should do — it is basically the same technology, involving Zeta Potential (very crudely: electrical charges attract).

Or put differently, gene modification was a known thing in vaccines as early as 1987.

So saponins allow DNA to escape from the endosome into the nucleus, modifying the cell’s DNA, confirming that Novavax are peddling a gene modification shot like everybody else.

A pre-planned vaccine from 1987 that includes saponins and transfection, that was put on ice for 32 years, trialled in 2019, and now rolled out in 2023. Before dire warnings of an imminent food shortage.