The 2020 US Election Day Thread

[FBD]

I voted for Trump for mainly 2 reasons. His America first plan and his belief in law and order.. All the rest of the god shit and abortion crap and fuck the Earth as long as were making money crap is not for me..!

No, and neither is the gay stuff either, but as any unbiased eye can see, Trump has gone out of his way to be inclusive of everyone, doing something for everyone - traitors aside, of course, they're just mad they're losing their gravy train. As I saw the globalist edifice recoil in horror and shoot themselves in the foot time and time again, I knew Trump was legit - there's absolutely no need for the system to have burned so much of its credibility - if the traitors were 100% in control of the system then we'd have been fucked and there would have been no reason for it. You see Trump undoing as much of the globalist's plans as has been feasible thus far...I'm not surprised by the efforts of the traitors to use the system to control the thoughts & emotions of people - but I am surprised by how much of the populace just went right along with it.

[Griffin]

I voted against Biden because a global socialist government is not for me.

[lost in melb.]

This is precisely what I meant when I tossed about the term "intellectual dishonesty" the other day.

I just take notice of the legal cases Dude. That's were those colourful screenshots need to become actual evidence

Here's some intellectual honesty...
Trump, Giuliani, Powell:

In Public: "Fraud, fraud, stolen, cheating!"
In Court: "There's no fraud"

During the hearing, the lawyer for the Trump campaign, Kory Langhofer, stated that the plaintiffs were "not alleging fraud" or "that anyone is stealing the election", but were disputing "good faith errors."[165]

The Ohio-based Porter Wright Morris & Arthur law firm that represented the Trump campaign withdrew from the case on November 13,[197] and Linda A. Kerns, a Republican attorney also representing the Trump campaign, asked the judge for permission to withdraw from the case on November 16.[a][198][75] Overall, the case saw three different sets of lawyers within a week.[199]

When the judge asked Trump's lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, on why the plaintiffs did not advance legal claims based on voter fraud, Giuliani replied that "this is not a fraud case".[200] Giuliani had previously made public claims of "fraud", "absolute fraud" in the election.[201] Fellow Trump lawyer Linda Kerns also agreed that this lawsuit was not based on "allegations of fraud or misconduct".[134]

[DemonGeminiX]

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Occams-razor

...or go mad.

It's a good philosophy but it's not always true.

[FBD]

I just take notice of the legal cases Dude. That's were those colourful screenshots need to become actual evidence

Here's some intellectual honesty...
Trump, Giuliani, Powell:

In Public: "Fraud, fraud, stolen, cheating!"
In Court: "There's no fraud"

I already corrected you on this instance you're quoting and you're bringing this up again? You still cant even get your funhouse mirror straight with the fact that you're conflating things when you make statements such as these. Then of course, you dont have the time to read when you're shown that you're way the fk out in left field 200 meters beyond the fence in the waist deep fescue


and those screenshots ARE actual evidence. signed sworn affidavits, what is so hard about understanding this fact?

people gave testimony and said yes its ok to put this out in public, that's what this is. those motherfuckers face 10-15 years in federal prison if they're lying. do you think hundreds of people are just going to say ahh let me make stuff up and spend 15 years in jail lying for trump? tf?

most people did not want their names out there for the hyenas to come after them. it doesnt matter because their testimony is all there, so making an ass out of yourself by saying evidence isnt evidence is just not a winning strategy here brotha.

[lost in melb.]

I already corrected you on this instance you're quoting and you're bringing this up again? You still cant even get your funhouse mirror straight with the fact that you're conflating things when you make statements such as these. Then of course, you dont have the time to read when you're shown that you're way the fk out in left field 200 meters beyond the fence in the waist deep fescue

So you don't disagree.

"Fraud, fraud!"
"There's no fraud!"

[FBD]

So you don't disagree.

"Fraud, fraud!"
"There's no fraud!"

that you're wrong and being obstinate about it? and then start mixing up words talking about it after the fact, in a half baked attempt to make yourself appear less wrong? yeah, I agree with that!

[lost in melb.]

that you're wrong and being obstinate about it? and then start mixing up words talking about it after the fact, in a half baked attempt to make yourself appear less wrong? yeah, I agree with that!

It's all just about one man

[FBD]

stockholm syndrome, victim of munchausen by proxy, you poor thing

[Griffin]

It's all just about one man

[lost in melb.]

Yes, some old senile establishment fart in his basement beat incumbent Trump. And it's a significant mark up! Welcome back America

[FBD]

Yes, some old senile establishment fart in his basement beat incumbent Trump. And it's a significant mark up! Welcome back America

>he got more black votes than obama
>he beat hillary in all battleground places and lost to her %s horribly everywhere else

and you still believe it

some people will believe anything "the news" tells them, but this is bey design. do your sources make sure they mention that they are your trusted source?

[The Monk]

[lost in melb.]

[FBD]

fbd actually reading the idiot shit you guys type


you guys when you finally realize oh shit fbd's right