Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Paramount hit with 'Top Gun: Maverick' copyright lawsuit

  1. #1
    #DeSantis2024 Teh One Who Knocks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    5280' Above Sea Level
    Posts
    256,052
    vCash
    10966
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Thanks
    23,816
    Thanked 113,096 Times in 59,906 Posts

    Law Paramount hit with 'Top Gun: Maverick' copyright lawsuit

    By Lauryn Overhultz | Fox News




    Paramount was hit with a copyright lawsuit by the family of the author behind the original story used for the "Top Gun" franchise, Fox News Digital can confirm.

    The "Top Gun" lawsuit was filed by Shosh and Yuval Yonay on Monday in California, according to The Wrap. The Yonays are the heirs of Ehud Yonay, the author of the 1983 article "Top Guns."

    The storyline for the original "Top Gun" film was based off the article.

    The Yonays have claimed that Paramount's rights to the article ended in 2020. The family alleged that filming for "Top Gun: Maverick" was not completed until May 8, 2021.

    However, Paramount has reportedly claimed the film was "sufficiently completed" before its rights to the original article were terminated.

    The family sent a cease-and-desist letter to Paramount on May 11, 2022, weeks before the release of "Top Gun: Maverick," according to The Hollywood Reporter.

    "This case arises out of Paramount’s conscious failure to re-acquire the requisite film and ancillary rights to the Yonays’ copyrighted Story prior to the completion and release of their derivative 2022 Sequel," attorney Marc Toberoff and former federal appellate judge Alex Kozinski, who are representing the Yonays, wrote.



    Paramount has denied the sequel is derivative from the original article, according to the outlet.

    "These claims are without merit, and we will defend ourselves vigorously," a spokesperson for Paramount told Fox News Digital.

    "Top Gun: Maverick" premiered on May 27 after suffering two years of delays due to the coronavirus pandemic. The film pulled in $160.5 million in the first four days. "Top Gun: Maverick" stayed afloat its second weekend, bringing in $86 million.



    The film also marked a career best for Cruise, who had not had a film opening exceed $100 million in the first weekend. Per TMZ, Cruise is not being sued personally.

  2. #2
    Shelter Dweller lost in melb.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Down Under
    Posts
    23,780
    vCash
    7596
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Thanks
    18,686
    Thanked 7,561 Times in 5,212 Posts
    They'll get money.

  3. #3
    Shelter Dweller PorkChopSandwiches's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    77,135
    vCash
    5000
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Thanks
    47,197
    Thanked 29,255 Times in 16,489 Posts
    frivolous






  4. The Following User Says Thank You to PorkChopSandwiches For This Useful Post:

    Hikari Kisugi (06-12-2022)

  5. #4
    Basement Dweller Godfather's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    16,821
    vCash
    13129
    Mentioned
    28 Post(s)
    Thanks
    4,306
    Thanked 6,771 Times in 4,010 Posts
    The first movie bought the license from the article until 2020... the new movie drops in 2022 and the original author's estate gets nothing? I think a court should probably decide if that's fair, sounds iffy.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Godfather For This Useful Post:

    lost in melb. (06-12-2022)

  7. #5
    Take Box B DemonGeminiX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Bum Fuck Egypt, East Jabip
    Posts
    64,807
    vCash
    27021
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Thanks
    45,043
    Thanked 16,893 Times in 11,968 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Godfather View Post
    The first movie bought the license from the article until 2020... the new movie drops in 2022 and the original author's estate gets nothing? I think a court should probably decide if that's fair, sounds iffy.
    They'll probably settle out of court for an undisclosed sum of money that is less than what the plaintiffs are suing for. That's the way of things these days.


    Warning: The posts of this forum member may contain trigger language which may be considered offensive to some.

    Music was better when ugly people were allowed to make it.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to DemonGeminiX For This Useful Post:

    lost in melb. (06-12-2022)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •